Why Can't We Throw Microsoft Under The Bus?
#11
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 4,042
Likes: 362
Agreed. Jepps are totally non-standardized. Random speeds all over the place on arrivals and approaches. LIDOS were much better and designed for an EFB. Jepps were designed for paper (and not well).
#12
Line Holder
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 1,104
Likes: 6
From: 737 A
Agreed. I actually preferred LIDOS even when we had them in paper and they took twice the space of Jepps.
#13
#14
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 4,042
Likes: 362
Yeah, it was actually formatted for zooming and a digital display. I bet they're cheaper than jepps too.. but that's just a guess based on the bottom feeder regionals who used them.
#15
Line Holder
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 1,104
Likes: 6
From: 737 A
I think FedEx has them too. At least that was the rumor when Pinnacle switched to them.
#17
Line Holder
Joined: Feb 2024
Posts: 314
Likes: 30
Jeppesen digital products have been vector graphics for decades. The software (whether Jepp FD Pro or ForeFlight) has a data string describing what to draw and then draws them.
#18
Line Holder
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 674
Likes: 20
#19
Line Holder
Joined: Jul 2023
Posts: 851
Likes: 176
AMM and the enroute map yeah, but I'm pretty sure the plates are just PDFs, which is why updates take so long and the whole thing is so slow.
#20
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
From: 757/767
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post




