787-10 Order Imminent?
#461
#462
I agree. One could argue that mgt has already seen what the 339 and 359 can do for our network and if they were perfectly happy with them in all aspects, including price they would simply order more. There is a reason the 787 is so popular, despite its early and Boeing continuing problems. It's hard to argue that the 787-10 in particular wouldn't fit well in our network given how much they seem to like the performance of the A333 which is now aging and close to retirement. The -9 would not have the same performance limitations as the 339 and might be a more optimal airframe in certain markets vs the A359. Time will tell.
#463
#466
#467
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 5,467
Likes: 144
From: UNA
not 787s per se, but related. But I wonder if we skip ordering 787s/339s and focus on 350s.
I think it’s kinda obvious at this point the 339 is challenged on most routes that are not east coast-Europe/ S.A. But given the new weights we have on the 359s I wonder if it would be worth carrying the extra capacity on routes with more 350s given it gives us more flexibility with higher D1 configuration and more cargo capacity. There is definitely a marginal cost to carrying the extra capacity, but that also means more revenue capability. Plus we don’t have to deal with the cost of standing up a new fleet.
Is there much the 787 can do that the 350 cannot?
I think it’s kinda obvious at this point the 339 is challenged on most routes that are not east coast-Europe/ S.A. But given the new weights we have on the 359s I wonder if it would be worth carrying the extra capacity on routes with more 350s given it gives us more flexibility with higher D1 configuration and more cargo capacity. There is definitely a marginal cost to carrying the extra capacity, but that also means more revenue capability. Plus we don’t have to deal with the cost of standing up a new fleet.
Is there much the 787 can do that the 350 cannot?
#468
not 787s per se, but related. But I wonder if we skip ordering 787s/339s and focus on 350s.
I think it’s kinda obvious at this point the 339 is challenged on most routes that are not east coast-Europe/ S.A. But given the new weights we have on the 359s I wonder if it would be worth carrying the extra capacity on routes with more 350s given it gives us more flexibility with higher D1 configuration and more cargo capacity. There is definitely a marginal cost to carrying the extra capacity, but that also means more revenue capability. Plus we don’t have to deal with the cost of standing up a new fleet.
Is there much the 787 can do that the 350 cannot?
I think it’s kinda obvious at this point the 339 is challenged on most routes that are not east coast-Europe/ S.A. But given the new weights we have on the 359s I wonder if it would be worth carrying the extra capacity on routes with more 350s given it gives us more flexibility with higher D1 configuration and more cargo capacity. There is definitely a marginal cost to carrying the extra capacity, but that also means more revenue capability. Plus we don’t have to deal with the cost of standing up a new fleet.
Is there much the 787 can do that the 350 cannot?
#469
Line Holder
Joined: Sep 2020
Posts: 1,507
Likes: 312
Boeing said their goal was to clear the backlog of over 900 deliveries by 2033. Right now they are producing 7 planes a month but trying to get to 16 a month by 2027. Also by 2027 I bet they have another 500 orders. They are already 18 months behind deliveries and the future delivery schedule is just going to get more full as Boeing pipeline is full. Waiting until 2027 to hope that Boeing will cancel other airlines delivery slots and slide Delta in isn't a bet I'd want to make if I was trying to optimize fleet makeup. United originally only ordered 100 planes and got a delivery schedule to 2032, but when we added 50 more firm options, those extra 50 are coming between 2028 and 2031 because Boeing said those were the only open slots they had in their pipeline.
Why not just get more A-350s. They seem to be great planes.
#470
Line Holder
Joined: Aug 2024
Posts: 761
Likes: 187
Delta should not wait until 2027 to order 787s. Better to order them now to get a place in line.
Boeing said their goal was to clear the backlog of over 900 deliveries by 2033. Right now they are producing 7 planes a month but trying to get to 16 a month by 2027. Also by 2027 I bet they have another 500 orders. They are already 18 months behind deliveries and the future delivery schedule is just going to get more full as Boeing pipeline is full. Waiting until 2027 to hope that Boeing will cancel other airlines delivery slots and slide Delta in isn't a bet I'd want to make if I was trying to optimize fleet makeup. United originally only ordered 100 planes and got a delivery schedule to 2032, but when we added 50 more firm options, those extra 50 are coming between 2028 and 2031 because Boeing said those were the only open slots they had in their pipeline.
Why not just get more A-350s. They seem to be great planes.
Boeing said their goal was to clear the backlog of over 900 deliveries by 2033. Right now they are producing 7 planes a month but trying to get to 16 a month by 2027. Also by 2027 I bet they have another 500 orders. They are already 18 months behind deliveries and the future delivery schedule is just going to get more full as Boeing pipeline is full. Waiting until 2027 to hope that Boeing will cancel other airlines delivery slots and slide Delta in isn't a bet I'd want to make if I was trying to optimize fleet makeup. United originally only ordered 100 planes and got a delivery schedule to 2032, but when we added 50 more firm options, those extra 50 are coming between 2028 and 2031 because Boeing said those were the only open slots they had in their pipeline.
Why not just get more A-350s. They seem to be great planes.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post




