Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Delta 56 Severe Turbulence >

Delta 56 Severe Turbulence

Search

Notices

Delta 56 Severe Turbulence

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-31-2025 | 04:07 PM
  #11  
Podracer's Avatar
On Reserve
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 146
Likes: 73
Default

Throughout my career, not just at Delta, I've always thought that there are about one third of pilots who do not take weather seriously enough. They act like you score points or something by deviating as less as possible. Its the type who's answer to everything at all times is "**shrug** we'll pick our way through."

There are also pilots who just aren't paying attention and flying with the radar off.
Reply
Old 07-31-2025 | 05:13 PM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,869
Likes: 188
Default

Originally Posted by DeltaboundRedux
Short of a hull loss, I can't recall the last time I read about 25 people going to the hospital.

If I had to guess based on galley pictures in the media, at a good portion of them were Delta flight attendants.

Speedy recovery.
No passengers required hospitalization. All were treated and released. Does seem odd the flight attendants were up and doing the service given the conditions.
Reply
Old 07-31-2025 | 05:29 PM
  #13  
2StgTurbine's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 2,840
Likes: 93
Default

Originally Posted by Podracer
Throughout my career, not just at Delta, I've always thought that there are about one third of pilots who do not take weather seriously enough. They act like you score points or something by deviating as less as possible. Its the type who's answer to everything at all times is "**shrug** we'll pick our way through."
I have flown with plenty of people who are scared of anything on the radar. I recently flew with an FO who wanted to clear a cell by 80 miles! Perhaps it was years of flying on the east coast with restricted airspace, but sometimes you do need to pick your way through a line of weather stretching from the Gulf to the Great Lakes. Not all radar returns are convective cells, and it does take some experience.

A common thing I have seen with those pilots is failing to take the winds into account. When they are going between cells, they try to go right in the middle of them. I would rather be 20 miles away from the downwind cell and 10 miles from the upwind cell rather than 15 miles from both.
Reply
Old 07-31-2025 | 05:50 PM
  #14  
weekends off? Nope...
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 2,409
Likes: 136
Default

Was the seatbelt sign even on? That’s a lot of injuries…
Reply
Old 07-31-2025 | 06:10 PM
  #15  
Trip7's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 6,145
Likes: 204
Default

330NEO has the multiscan radar right?
Reply
Old 07-31-2025 | 06:28 PM
  #16  
notEnuf's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 13,230
Likes: 678
From: ir.delta.com
Default

Originally Posted by 2StgTurbine
I have flown with plenty of people who are scared of anything on the radar. I recently flew with an FO who wanted to clear a cell by 80 miles! Perhaps it was years of flying on the east coast with restricted airspace, but sometimes you do need to pick your way through a line of weather stretching from the Gulf to the Great Lakes. Not all radar returns are convective cells, and it does take some experience.

A common thing I have seen with those pilots is failing to take the winds into account. When they are going between cells, they try to go right in the middle of them. I would rather be 20 miles away from the downwind cell and 10 miles from the upwind cell rather than 15 miles from both.
In southern Wyoming traffic and airspace are not an issue, normally. I have come to love the 737 radar because it amplifies everything. What was my "normal" avoidance margin has gotten greater with the same depiction without even trying. ...or I'm just getting old. Yeah, old probably explains it. Nevermind.
Reply
Old 07-31-2025 | 06:41 PM
  #17  
madmax757's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,226
Likes: 30
From: seated - facing forward
Default

Originally Posted by Podracer
Throughout my career, not just at Delta, I've always thought that there are about one third of pilots who do not take weather seriously enough. They act like you score points or something by deviating as less as possible. Its the type who's answer to everything at all times is "**shrug** we'll pick our way through."

There are also pilots who just aren't paying attention and flying with the radar off.
pretty standard practice (AIM) is to deviate around severe thunderstorms by 20 miles . Looks like they went right into a severe weather or in the tops. The 330-900 is nearly new and has radar for dummies . Looks like gross negligence to me.
Reply
Old 07-31-2025 | 07:13 PM
  #18  
New Hire
 
Joined: Jun 2025
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by 2StgTurbine
A common thing I have seen with those pilots is failing to take the winds into account. When they are going between cells, they try to go right in the middle of them. I would rather be 20 miles away from the downwind cell and 10 miles from the upwind cell rather than 15 miles from both.
Wouldn’t you want to be 20 miles from the upwind and 10 miles from the downwind? The hazard is going to travel with the wind and so will the anvil and hail throw (if present).

Regardless, agree weather avoidance certainly has been minimized as others have said for whatever reasons in many circles of aviation. Glad there’s at least some critical thought application out there. I flew older aircraft with attenuation problems and flying right down the middle of a gap could literally blow up in your face.

#ThingsTheMediterraneanPainfullyTaughtMe
Reply
Old 07-31-2025 | 07:14 PM
  #19  
LumberJack's Avatar
Coverage Award...
Community Favorite
Loved
5 Years
20 Countries Visited
 
Joined: Nov 2016
Posts: 1,708
Likes: 127
Default

Originally Posted by madmax757
pretty standard practice (AIM) is to deviate around severe thunderstorms by 20 miles . Looks like they went right into a severe weather or in the tops. The 330-900 is nearly new and has radar for dummies . Looks like gross negligence to me.
Maybe, or could be any number of other things. It amazes me how people think they have enough information.
Reply
Old 07-31-2025 | 08:34 PM
  #20  
Tinpusher007's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,800
Likes: 22
From: 330 B
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
No passengers required hospitalization. All were treated and released. Does seem odd the flight attendants were up and doing the service given the conditions.
Maybe they weren't told to sit. It appears the crew didn't deviate around the wx at all so maybe they didn't feel the conditions warranted the FAs to be seated. Pax account of what happened said it was all of a sudden.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Kilroy
ExpressJet
10796
01-11-2016 06:49 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM
RockBottom
Major
0
09-15-2006 09:50 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices