Contract 2026
#681
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,872
Likes: 189
To add to GoneFlying, remember that TA1 was like 6 months early. Recalls, mediation, AIP, vote, ratification, and signing all occurred within 11 months of amendable.
not true. C15 was FULL retro. And within a year of amendable.
And before anyone chimes with with the C19 lack-of-FULL-Retro hysteria, make sure you acknowledge that Covid was a thing, and essentially shut down the company for about a full year. By the time the negotiating environment had turned from unbelievably bleak to neutral, we had a deal in less than a year.
I’m not arguing we will (necessarily) have a contract by 31 Dec 2026, just that it won’t be years late (barring some unforeseen event).
not true. C15 was FULL retro. And within a year of amendable.
And before anyone chimes with with the C19 lack-of-FULL-Retro hysteria, make sure you acknowledge that Covid was a thing, and essentially shut down the company for about a full year. By the time the negotiating environment had turned from unbelievably bleak to neutral, we had a deal in less than a year.
I’m not arguing we will (necessarily) have a contract by 31 Dec 2026, just that it won’t be years late (barring some unforeseen event).
If the opener is like 2019 management will sit on it until time has once again worked its magic. You will end up with about the same give or take however the next bite of the apple will be delayed 3 to 4 years. I have zero doubt which strategy puts more money in pilot pockets.
#682
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,872
Likes: 189
What other parts of contract 2012 due you feel were concessionary?
#683
I tend to agree on EDP in principle, but that assumes we get a neutral mediator. If the NMB were to appoint someone who was very friendly to management and or/anti union, they could use the fact it is not industry standard to ice us if we refuse to negotiate with the company on removing it. We have both seen how incredibly biased certain rulings have been in recent past, and TBH I have lost a lot of faith in the system to be neutral.
we are pretty much the only major airline that has not had to have negotiations drag on for years after the amendable date (Covid excluded) to get a CBA in the past 15 years. I think it’s foolish to think that could never happen here, especially since the dynamics of the negotiations could be different than our last several with a R potus making NMB appointments.
we are pretty much the only major airline that has not had to have negotiations drag on for years after the amendable date (Covid excluded) to get a CBA in the past 15 years. I think it’s foolish to think that could never happen here, especially since the dynamics of the negotiations could be different than our last several with a R potus making NMB appointments.
We may have to agree to disagree on the degree to which negotiations are likely to go past amendable. I think it's certainly possible they will go past amenable date, but not dragging on 2-3+ years. We'll know more in about 8 months, once openers are exchanged (in April?) plus a couple months. We are in a great negotiating position. The economy is stable, the company is back to printing money, and the company has no argument they 'need' anything from us. especially since they are in a better position than when EDP was first negotiated.
Personally, I think notification is going to be a gatekeeper issue for the company. I think they are going to demand to have automated notification for (possibly) anything. They will claim the technology is there. I put that on my survey. IF we cave on notification (which I genuinely hope we do not), it better be a massive quid in return.
No concessions
#684
Roll’n Thunder
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 5,130
Likes: 549
From: Pilot
There is zero reason to go backwards in any area of our contract. The company is making billions of dollars a year in profits. Waaaaa, EDP and RR pay means they're not profiting billions + XX millions more.
#685
They could save more money just automating trip assignments and following the contract. I wonder how many millions they expend in 23m7 monthly.
#686
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 5,578
Likes: 319
The PS change in contract 2012 reduced potential profit sharing about 1.9% in years with a profit. It was however exchanged for a 2% pay raise that has compounded into about 4% now. I agree it’s arguable to say the rates might be where they are today had we not received the extra 2%. No way to really know. Since every other airline other than SWA patterned bargained off the 2012 rates it’s reasonable to think it’s still in the rates today at some level.
What other parts of contract 2012 due you feel were concessionary?
What other parts of contract 2012 due you feel were concessionary?
#687
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,872
Likes: 189
We did increase the number of large regional jets. However we reduced the total number of regional jets and got a commitment to purchase a large number of 100 seat jets. Jets this forum assured us would never show up. Seen a 717 or A220-100 lately? That’s what you call a win-win solution. We voted differently, I voted for 2012, against TA1, for TA2 and against contract 2019.
#688
Line Holder
Joined: Jan 2020
Posts: 607
Likes: 119
We did increase the number of large regional jets. However we reduced the total number of regional jets and got a commitment to purchase a large number of 100 seat jets. Jets this forum assured us would never show up. Seen a 717 or A220-100 lately? That’s what you call a win-win solution.We voted differently, I voted for 2012, against TA1, for TA2 and against contract 2019.
#689
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,872
Likes: 189
In terms of the position of the airline at the time and the relative pay rates with the competition they were better. 2012 was also on time. Again that is a huge factor in pushing compensation up at the quickest rate. You have to pull the competition up with you. I suspect on a percentage inflation basis they were also both worth more than contract 2019 which was a 7 year agreement covering the highest inflation years over the previous 30.
#690
In terms of the position of the airline at the time and the relative pay rates with the competition they were better. 2012 was also on time. Again that is a huge factor in pushing compensation up at the quickest rate. You have to pull the competition up with you. I suspect on a percentage inflation basis they were also both worth more than contract 2019 which was a 7 year agreement covering the highest inflation years over the previous 30.
Further, I submit it is the most popular contract since at least C2000.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



