Search

Notices

Contract 2026

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-26-2025 | 03:32 PM
  #681  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,872
Likes: 189
Default

Originally Posted by FangsF15
To add to GoneFlying, remember that TA1 was like 6 months early. Recalls, mediation, AIP, vote, ratification, and signing all occurred within 11 months of amendable.






not true. C15 was FULL retro. And within a year of amendable.

And before anyone chimes with with the C19 lack-of-FULL-Retro hysteria, make sure you acknowledge that Covid was a thing, and essentially shut down the company for about a full year. By the time the negotiating environment had turned from unbelievably bleak to neutral, we had a deal in less than a year.

I’m not arguing we will (necessarily) have a contract by 31 Dec 2026, just that it won’t be years late (barring some unforeseen event).
It simply depends on the opener. If it’s in the zone of reasonableness I suspect you all will be able to knock it out in a year if not on-time. You can be back at the table working on the next contract in 3 years. You will also have by that point lifted AA, UAL and SWA up. Management is more concerned what they pay you relative to the competition than the actual rates. That becomes a huge help on the next contract.
If the opener is like 2019 management will sit on it until time has once again worked its magic. You will end up with about the same give or take however the next bite of the apple will be delayed 3 to 4 years. I have zero doubt which strategy puts more money in pilot pockets.
Reply
Old 10-26-2025 | 03:37 PM
  #682  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,872
Likes: 189
Default

Originally Posted by Softheborder
C12 was absolutely concessionary. How much have we collectively given up in PS since then??? How long was the timeline from C15 openers to TA2 signing???
The PS change in contract 2012 reduced potential profit sharing about 1.9% in years with a profit. It was however exchanged for a 2% pay raise that has compounded into about 4% now. I agree it’s arguable to say the rates might be where they are today had we not received the extra 2%. No way to really know. Since every other airline other than SWA patterned bargained off the 2012 rates it’s reasonable to think it’s still in the rates today at some level.
What other parts of contract 2012 due you feel were concessionary?
Reply
Old 10-26-2025 | 03:37 PM
  #683  
FangsF15's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 8,233
Likes: 1,199
Default

Originally Posted by Gone Flying
I tend to agree on EDP in principle, but that assumes we get a neutral mediator. If the NMB were to appoint someone who was very friendly to management and or/anti union, they could use the fact it is not industry standard to ice us if we refuse to negotiate with the company on removing it. We have both seen how incredibly biased certain rulings have been in recent past, and TBH I have lost a lot of faith in the system to be neutral.

we are pretty much the only major airline that has not had to have negotiations drag on for years after the amendable date (Covid excluded) to get a CBA in the past 15 years. I think it’s foolish to think that could never happen here, especially since the dynamics of the negotiations could be different than our last several with a R potus making NMB appointments.
I don't think the mediator has that kind of power. They are not an arbitrator that can force anything. They certainly can put pressure on the NC to give 'something' to the company, but I highly doubt they will lean on that one little nuance (in the big scheme of things). And they certainly aren't going to 'ice' us over EDP.

We may have to agree to disagree on the degree to which negotiations are likely to go past amendable. I think it's certainly possible they will go past amenable date, but not dragging on 2-3+ years. We'll know more in about 8 months, once openers are exchanged (in April?) plus a couple months. We are in a great negotiating position. The economy is stable, the company is back to printing money, and the company has no argument they 'need' anything from us. especially since they are in a better position than when EDP was first negotiated.

Personally, I think notification is going to be a gatekeeper issue for the company. I think they are going to demand to have automated notification for (possibly) anything. They will claim the technology is there. I put that on my survey. IF we cave on notification (which I genuinely hope we do not), it better be a massive quid in return.

No concessions
Reply
Old 10-26-2025 | 04:17 PM
  #684  
Roll’n Thunder
Community Influencer
15 Years
On Reserve
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 5,130
Likes: 549
From: Pilot
Default

There is zero reason to go backwards in any area of our contract. The company is making billions of dollars a year in profits. Waaaaa, EDP and RR pay means they're not profiting billions + XX millions more.
Reply
Old 10-26-2025 | 07:47 PM
  #685  
PilotJ3's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
15 Years
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 3,846
Likes: 97
Default

Originally Posted by tennisguru
There is zero reason to go backwards in any area of our contract. The company is making billions of dollars a year in profits. Waaaaa, EDP and RR pay means they're not profiting billions + XX millions more.
They could save more money just automating trip assignments and following the contract. I wonder how many millions they expend in 23m7 monthly.
Reply
Old 10-26-2025 | 07:57 PM
  #686  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 5,578
Likes: 319
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
The PS change in contract 2012 reduced potential profit sharing about 1.9% in years with a profit. It was however exchanged for a 2% pay raise that has compounded into about 4% now. I agree it’s arguable to say the rates might be where they are today had we not received the extra 2%. No way to really know. Since every other airline other than SWA patterned bargained off the 2012 rates it’s reasonable to think it’s still in the rates today at some level.
What other parts of contract 2012 due you feel were concessionary?
Scope. Increases large regional jets allowed. There was more. I remember voting no and being disappointed that it passed. Also remember voting no to TA1. I was starting to think I was a permanent no voter, but then I voted yes on next two TA’s.
Reply
Old 10-27-2025 | 04:22 AM
  #687  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,872
Likes: 189
Default

Originally Posted by hockeypilot44
Scope. Increases large regional jets allowed. There was more. I remember voting no and being disappointed that it passed. Also remember voting no to TA1. I was starting to think I was a permanent no voter, but then I voted yes on next two TA’s.
We did increase the number of large regional jets. However we reduced the total number of regional jets and got a commitment to purchase a large number of 100 seat jets. Jets this forum assured us would never show up. Seen a 717 or A220-100 lately? That’s what you call a win-win solution. We voted differently, I voted for 2012, against TA1, for TA2 and against contract 2019.
Reply
Old 10-27-2025 | 05:25 AM
  #688  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2020
Posts: 607
Likes: 119
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
We did increase the number of large regional jets. However we reduced the total number of regional jets and got a commitment to purchase a large number of 100 seat jets. Jets this forum assured us would never show up. Seen a 717 or A220-100 lately? That’s what you call a win-win solution.We voted differently, I voted for 2012, against TA1, for TA2 and against contract 2019.
A very strange world you live in where C12 and TA2 are, in your mind, better than C19. lol.
Reply
Old 10-27-2025 | 07:28 AM
  #689  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,872
Likes: 189
Default

Originally Posted by igotgummed
A very strange world you live in where C12 and TA2 are, in your mind, better than C19. lol.
In terms of the position of the airline at the time and the relative pay rates with the competition they were better. 2012 was also on time. Again that is a huge factor in pushing compensation up at the quickest rate. You have to pull the competition up with you. I suspect on a percentage inflation basis they were also both worth more than contract 2019 which was a 7 year agreement covering the highest inflation years over the previous 30.
Reply
Old 10-27-2025 | 08:06 AM
  #690  
FangsF15's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 8,233
Likes: 1,199
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
In terms of the position of the airline at the time and the relative pay rates with the competition they were better. 2012 was also on time. Again that is a huge factor in pushing compensation up at the quickest rate. You have to pull the competition up with you. I suspect on a percentage inflation basis they were also both worth more than contract 2019 which was a 7 year agreement covering the highest inflation years over the previous 30.
C19 needs to have a huge asterisk next to it. Claiming it was a 7 year agreement is an insufficient description. Covid had a massive, massive impact on the timing of it.

Further, I submit it is the most popular contract since at least C2000.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
White Cap
Cargo
49
09-26-2019 06:11 PM
jsled
United
7
11-28-2012 11:08 PM
ea500driver
Union Talk
26
06-26-2010 09:54 AM
BoredwLife
Major
1
07-16-2008 01:27 PM
To Stay or Go
Cargo
50
04-21-2006 09:35 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices