Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Delta (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/)
-   -   Q3 earnings call (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/151218-q3-earnings-call.html)

Tailhookah 10-14-2025 01:44 PM


Originally Posted by OOfff (Post 3959802)
if your media diet has fed you this, you really need to rethink the places from which you receive information

At an extraordinary cost for that wind generated kilowatt, you are correct. But an apples to apples comparison, not even close to coal or natural gas. The price for wind vs fossil fuel electric generation is more and when you add the necessary fossil fuel backup, which is needed when (gasp) the wind stops blowing or the sun doesn’t shine it’s not even close.

FangsF15 10-14-2025 01:44 PM


Originally Posted by OOfff (Post 3959846)
we talked about how you’re wrong about ivanpah in another thread, but here it is again.

and no, he’s not right about the energy required to construct a wind generator.

For commercial/large size windmills, it’s well in excess of a decade to break even, sometimes nearly 2 decades. The lifespan is approximately 25 years, at least from what I can find. So it will pay for itself eventually, but it’s no panacea. I think they finally found some way to recycle the used blades finally, other than burying Oh them in the dirt. So there’s that.

crewdawg 10-14-2025 01:54 PM

Bring on nuclear! Even France realizes that it is a great option.

OOfff 10-14-2025 01:55 PM


Originally Posted by FangsF15 (Post 3959852)
For commercial/large size windmills, it’s well in excess of a decade to break even, sometimes nearly 2 decades. The lifespan is approximately 25 years, at least from what I can find. So it will pay for itself eventually, but it’s no panacea. I think they finally found some way to recycle the used blades finally, other than burying Oh them in the dirt. So there’s that.

the energy payback is much shorter than a decade, more like less than a year to a few years, and the carbon payback is similarly short. stop getting news from memes

heres a link to the editor of the book from which this falsehood originates, explaining how the meme is wrong:

https://homerdixon.com/resource/no-not-say-wind-energy-idiot-power/

OOfff 10-14-2025 01:56 PM


Originally Posted by Tailhookah (Post 3959851)
At an extraordinary cost for that wind generated kilowatt, you are correct. But an apples to apples comparison, not even close to coal or natural gas. The price for wind vs fossil fuel electric generation is more and when you add the necessary fossil fuel backup, which is needed when (gasp) the wind stops blowing or the sun doesn’t shine it’s not even close.

ah, so now you’ve moved the goalposts from being wrong about energy payback to being wrong about cost per kilowatt. why don’t we stick to one claim all the way through?

Meme In Command 10-14-2025 02:01 PM


Originally Posted by Hotel Kilo (Post 3959834)
Greenies

unicorns and rainbows aspirations. You had your fun, now adults are back in charge.

If you want solar and wind, put it on your house.


Originally Posted by Tailhookah (Post 3959838)
Keep your head in the hole green ostrich. The truth will set you free. You’ve been brainwashed. There’s no such thing as green energy or renewable. Do some research and take down the Al Gore poster in your porn room. He’s a sham.

Oh look, it's the tried and true devolution of renewable energy discourse into hippie earth saving granola bullsh!t and once again never speaking in terms of national security and energy independence.

Yawn...

Funny how China is covering their landscape in solar panels though. Yes, famous tree hugging hippies: THE CHINESE. The CCP folded to the environmentalist "Save the Pangolin!" Campaign...:D

But the way, all for nuclear energy. Split baby split! (As in the atom)

Meme In Command 10-14-2025 02:03 PM


Originally Posted by OOfff (Post 3959855)
stop getting news from memes

Hey, easy. I have some journalistic integridy.....some

OOfff 10-14-2025 02:06 PM

if this is where you got your knowledge on the subject, rethink your media diet and ask why the person making it or reposting it wants to lie to you

https://i.ibb.co/QvZXZFtZ/IMG-5647.jpg

SideStickMonkey 10-14-2025 02:27 PM


Originally Posted by Tailhookah (Post 3959746)
Are you a green plant or a FOC (friend of China)? Coal is clean if burned correctly. The while plume coming out of stacks is steam…. You could stick your face in that plume and get a steam bath. Wind has not been good and only makes sense is very windy environments or very rural off grid areas. A wind generator doesn’t make enough electricity in its lifespan to overcome the cost of building it. And big solar farms are hit or miss. Where solar would be more reasonable is to mandate (in areas where there’s enough yearly sunlight and cloudless days, no trees etc) that every new home built/condo/apartment building to have mandatory solar panels on the roofs. Then solar makes sense. The combined solar output in those communities augments the KW needed to power those communities.

Fly into Vegas, Phoenix, Cali and scratch your head why there’s not solar on every roof. Big solar farms can be wiped out by 1 freak hail storm. As it’s already happened.

Nothing beats good old fashioned nuclear and fossil fuel use. Augment this power with solar and use wind only where it’s needed. But the rest is a joke.

Well China is leaning heavy into renewables. No one is claiming renewables are cheap, just renewable.

Nuclear is a great option (as I've been advocating for) but also very expensive to build. While microreactors are coming, they aren't here yet and really are only a good idea in remote areas. Besides that the traditional plant makes sense but those take name and money while not even discussing nimbyism. You're obviously a Navy guy so you've been around nuclear power. There's still drawbacks but the goods outweigh the negatives.

We had solar panels on my house in Florida in the 1980s. California is putting solar farms over aqueducts which provide a double win: no extra land required and the microclimate from the cool water helps keep the cells more efficient.

And no matter how you burn coal, it's not clean, has nasty by products. The entire world has moved on from coal. China has even realized they need to move on from coal.

waldo135 10-14-2025 03:09 PM


Originally Posted by OOfff (Post 3959802)
if your media diet has fed you this, you really need to rethink the places from which you receive information

Harvard, that bastion of conservative thought, has something to say about the overall cost of wind
https://hbr.org/2024/02/the-long-ter...-wind-turbines


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:25 AM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands