![]() |
at least now we have crew resources incentivizing trip coverage with extra pay over the holidays that isn’t in the contract…
|
Originally Posted by notEnuf
(Post 3984961)
Your dependance on premium is not the priority. That is the blunt way to put it. Sorry if that offends, I'm in the same situation. Maximizing leverage is the priority. If you thought the original batch size and 23M7 give away was the blunder of the century, then be ready for a new one. This would be epicly worse to renegotiate 23M7 now. I like your quid but that's not happening without a comprehensive change and huge quid that will only come in section 6.
Whats the leverage again? If you don’t give us a contract, we will continue to Let’s do this for the next 2-5 years? At least throw a “trust me bro” in there somewhere. |
Originally Posted by Planetrain
(Post 3984967)
Whats the leverage again?
If you don’t give us a contract, we will continue to Let’s do this for the next 2-5 years? At least throw a “trust me bro” in there somewhere. |
Originally Posted by OOfff
(Post 3984966)
at least now we have crew resources incentivizing trip coverage with extra pay over the holidays that isn’t in the contract…
Now, if you are talking about the fact they are ONLY offering it during the holidays, as if its a discretionary thing they can turn on/off at their whim, then I'm in complete agreement with you. |
Originally Posted by FangsF15
(Post 3984973)
If you are talking about the "above 6" SC paying 3:00 or 2:00 if not used, that 100% is in the contract.
|
Originally Posted by ancman
(Post 3984907)
We’ll see if the deal reached in section 6 is acceptable or not.
No more LOA/MOU Band-Aids between now and then. |
Originally Posted by FangsF15
(Post 3984973)
If you are talking about the "above 6" SC paying 3:00 or 2:00 if not used, that 100% is in the contract.
|
Originally Posted by ancman
(Post 3984928)
Then put pressure on management to implement the agreement they already agreed to (25-05). If they fail to, then it’s proof that they’re negotiating in bad faith.
The leverage present is massive. Of course the underpaid, overworked crew scheduler doesn’t care. Executive management 100% does. |
Originally Posted by notEnuf
(Post 3984972)
3X and potentially 4X for trip coverage close in. Yes, your premium cheese has moved, go find it. It's still out there and the wheel-o-cheese is rolling down hill and getting bigger by the day.
By the way, contrary to someone's misread of an earlier post of mine, this whole mess hardly affects me. A330A, getting on in years, I just flew my first GS of the year (I average one a year) and am pretty well paid for flying a normal schedule. I've flown one IA ever, and that was about five years ago. MY flying life is good, but I am both in a category and career stage where all this stuff doesn't relate much. However I am a big proponent of the letter and spirit of organized labor and our PWA. I don't like seeing guys who are volunteering to help the company out, anticipating premium pay as the quid pro quo, and not getting it--like they used to--for all sorts of not-great reasons. Obviously we have some leverage (the amount is debatable) and I am not saying we should just give things away for free. However, there are those who reasonably believe that the entire Auto Accept leading to mass IAs is itself an anti-spirit-of-the-PWA concession of sorts. I'd like to see all this resolved so that pilots aren't bitter between themselves. |
Originally Posted by Gunfighter
(Post 3984920)
NEWS FLASH: We aren't negotiating with CS. We are negotiating with executives who care about triple pay.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:44 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands