![]() |
Originally Posted by hockeypilot44
(Post 3989950)
Correct and because it’s called “inverse assignment,” we have junior pilots that think they are entitled to the premium trips first. They are ignoring the fact that the company is skipping the entire trip coverage ladder.
I heard a rumor that the company made $100 million in 23.M.7 payments in December alone. I remember the company getting angry because it thought the pilot group was abusing sick leave by $42 million per yer. This is shaping up to be $1.2 billion per yer. My prediction is we get a contract 6 months early because the company needs this fixed ASAP. I was called “wildly off base” on here just a few months ago for saying this would eventually amount to hundreds of millions of dollars per year. As it is currently playing out, my estimate was too low. This is a growing investment that will be well-positioned for the start of section 6. |
Originally Posted by ancman
(Post 3989982)
…
I was called “wildly off base” on here just a few months ago for saying this would eventually amount to hundreds of millions of dollars per year. As it is currently playing out, my estimate was too low. This is a growing investment that will be well-positioned for the start of section 6. |
Originally Posted by ancman
(Post 3989982)
Bingo. This is why patience is a virtue, rather than rushing to a deal that sells ourselves short.
I was called “wildly off base” on here just a few months ago for saying this would eventually amount to hundreds of millions of dollars per year. As it is currently playing out, my estimate was too low. This is a growing investment that will be well-positioned for the start of section 6. |
Originally Posted by ancman
(Post 3989982)
Bingo. This is why patience is a virtue, rather than rushing to a deal that sells ourselves short.
I was called “wildly off base” on here just a few months ago for saying this would eventually amount to hundreds of millions of dollars per year. As it is currently playing out, my estimate was too low. This is a growing investment that will be well-positioned for the start of section 6. |
Originally Posted by ancman
(Post 3989982)
Bingo. This is why patience is a virtue, rather than rushing to a deal that sells ourselves short.
I was called “wildly off base” on here just a few months ago for saying this would eventually amount to hundreds of millions of dollars per year. As it is currently playing out, my estimate was too low. This is a growing investment that will be well-positioned for the start of section 6. Seems we are rapidly approaching that "number". This is leverage for us going in to Sect 6. I hope we don't pizz it away. |
Originally Posted by Meme In Command
(Post 3989989)
I'll gladly admit I did not see it at first and I'm coming around to see your argument. Consider me wrong and mind changed 🫡
|
Originally Posted by mattmatt
(Post 3990001)
wait. is this still apc?
https://media4.giphy.com/media/v1.Y2...UodG/giphy.gif |
Originally Posted by Meme In Command
(Post 3990016)
I'd turn this place into a pseudo-meme page but I only know how to post gifs. I haven't figured out how to post pics yet. I know they're somewhere in here....
https://media4.giphy.com/media/v1.Y2...UodG/giphy.gif |
Originally Posted by Meme In Command
(Post 3990016)
I'd turn this place into a pseudo-meme page but I only know how to post gifs. I haven't figured out how to post pics yet. I know they're somewhere in here....
https://media4.giphy.com/media/v1.Y2...UodG/giphy.gif |
Originally Posted by FangsF15
(Post 3990021)
I feel so conflicted! The Forum Rules do say, "Excessive usage of images in forum posts is generally frowned upon." But then again, define 'excessive' when the humor is often so friggin funny and apropos...
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:56 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands