Prepare Yourselves... 2026 AEs
#181
Roll’n Thunder
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 5,178
Likes: 587
From: Pilot
Half of their problem is the total abandonment of the traditional Section 23 coverage ladders. They seem not to realize that many of their “reserves” were actually line holders picking up WS trips. As the month went on, those would become short-notice GS trips. If you don’t run WS coverage, a lot of pilots are sitting home because they simply aren’t being called.
Specifically regarding GS, to the extent they’d ever run that step regularly again, many actual reserves are ineligible for them due to this wildly stupid “pre-posted rest” program. They put cancelation codes in for flights that blame pilot staffing, while many reserves sit unused at home, with GS slips in, and are not even getting a call because they are “on rest,” having worked precisely 0 hours before the “rest” was assigned.
What we’re left with is a situation where people are happy earning just the reserve guarantee, or the minimum LCW on a regular line, and riding it out. We have discussed at length how ridiculous the 23M7/IA/CNO debacle has been, so there is no need to rehash why that is not a solution to this problem.
All of this speaks volumes about our leadership, or lack thereof. “But but but…Crew 360!…The Asterisk!…Auto-Accept!…Pods!…We’re Smart!” They yell all this while burning a rumored $100m a month on a clearly failed experiment. Even for a profitable company, that type of egregious decision making should mandate a significant shake up.
Specifically regarding GS, to the extent they’d ever run that step regularly again, many actual reserves are ineligible for them due to this wildly stupid “pre-posted rest” program. They put cancelation codes in for flights that blame pilot staffing, while many reserves sit unused at home, with GS slips in, and are not even getting a call because they are “on rest,” having worked precisely 0 hours before the “rest” was assigned.
What we’re left with is a situation where people are happy earning just the reserve guarantee, or the minimum LCW on a regular line, and riding it out. We have discussed at length how ridiculous the 23M7/IA/CNO debacle has been, so there is no need to rehash why that is not a solution to this problem.
All of this speaks volumes about our leadership, or lack thereof. “But but but…Crew 360!…The Asterisk!…Auto-Accept!…Pods!…We’re Smart!” They yell all this while burning a rumored $100m a month on a clearly failed experiment. Even for a profitable company, that type of egregious decision making should mandate a significant shake up.
#182
For sure there will continue to be new hires going there, you have to keep the category decently staffed to the end. I think newhires were getting M88 awards until just shortly before we shut down that category. Not saying it's shutting down soon, but fewer awards make sense. Yesterday's AE was another -11 for the DTW717B. A side was -5, with the only award being a base transfer.
#183
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 12,836
Likes: 175
From: window seat
#184
On Reserve
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 161
Likes: 8
I'm sure someone smarter on here can explain but after this AE ATL73NA appears overstaffed by 100, and DTW320A overstaffed by 40.
Last edited by Podrick; 01-16-2026 at 09:04 AM.
#185
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 12,547
Likes: 1,155
#186
On Reserve
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 161
Likes: 8
Quick glance at A vs B, as well as the June 2026 staffing projection to account for future new hire B’s.
The staffing projection isn’t always accurate, but most categories seem to add up, but DTW320 and ATL73N seem off. I’m also only looking at widgetseniority, so maybe there’s something wrong with the data.
The staffing projection isn’t always accurate, but most categories seem to add up, but DTW320 and ATL73N seem off. I’m also only looking at widgetseniority, so maybe there’s something wrong with the data.
#187
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 12,547
Likes: 1,155
Quick glance at A vs B, as well as the June 2026 staffing projection to account for future new hire B’s.
The staffing projection isn’t always accurate, but most categories seem to add up, but DTW320 and ATL73N seem off. I’m also only looking at widgetseniority, so maybe there’s something wrong with the data.
The staffing projection isn’t always accurate, but most categories seem to add up, but DTW320 and ATL73N seem off. I’m also only looking at widgetseniority, so maybe there’s something wrong with the data.
#188
On Reserve
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 161
Likes: 8
Correct, like I said I'm including unbid spots and the June projection to account for that.
Even if you ignore B's, there's a pretty big gap between the June staffing projection and current staffing for A's. I was hoping someone here knew why that is or how that works.
Even if you ignore B's, there's a pretty big gap between the June staffing projection and current staffing for A's. I was hoping someone here knew why that is or how that works.
#189
Line Holder
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 527
Likes: 26
From: 320
#190
Line Holder
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 806
Likes: 6
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



