![]() |
Originally Posted by GutterGuard
(Post 4004984)
I absolutely believe the company is fully aware of Curly's website. It's clearly sanctioned. Therein lies another of my gripes. Screwing active employees using company proprietary data to help their fellow pilots, but looking the other way when a retiree does it.
I don’t have a shred of knowledge about any ‘drug deal’ with the company, if any. That may be a back room deal for all I know. And I’m not defending that. Just that the company has to know… |
I am quite thankful for John Bell’s and Curly’s sites. Curly isn’t getting rich off his $2/mo fee and he didn’t raise prices when we went from 3 AEs a year to 12 mock and 12 real/year. Whether you clashed with him 10+years ago or not, his site has been accurate and comprehensive with loads of archived data ive long since purged but wish I hadn’t. Happy to pay him a few bucks for an optional service that is 10x what dalpa offers. (Not a knock on dalpa either, like it too)
|
Originally Posted by Gunfighter
(Post 4004673)
Have you tried yesterday's drop of Sonnet 4.6 from Claude AI? It wrote a VBA script for Excel that just crushed a 25+ variable spreadsheet meeting 6 thresholds of output requirements in 30 minutes. 25 minutes were me looking for the "run Macro" button in Excel.
Recreating Easy Swap and EasyBid suddenly seem within reach. |
Originally Posted by FangsF15
(Post 4005005)
In what way is an active employee being screwed? I’m sure I’m missing it somehow. Oak notes?
I don’t have a shred of knowledge about any ‘drug deal’ with the company, if any. That may be a back room deal for all I know. And I’m not defending that. Just that the company has to know… |
Originally Posted by GutterGuard
(Post 4005069)
The dude behind Oaknotes got lawyered pretty hard.
|
They are very selective on who they go after.
|
I'm sure Curly is allowed because of the hundreds of millions him and his merry band of misfits that controlled the union for a decade saved the company.
|
Originally Posted by CX500T
(Post 4005079)
They are very selective on who they go after.
|
Originally Posted by GutterGuard
(Post 4004984)
I absolutely believe the company is fully aware of Curly's website. It's clearly sanctioned. Therein lies another of my gripes. Screwing active employees using company proprietary data to help their fellow pilots, but looking the other way when a retiree does it.
|
Originally Posted by NERD
(Post 4005102)
I'm sure Curly is allowed because of the hundreds of millions him and his merry band of misfits that controlled the union for a decade saved the company.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:26 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands