Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Simultaneous QS and IA’s >

Simultaneous QS and IA?s

Search

Notices

Simultaneous QS and IA’s

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-18-2026 | 05:41 AM
  #31  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 123
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by FangsF15
Also, for ease of input, put the start date as the first day of the bid period, then you never need to update that field - just change the 'end' date.
You should put the start date as the second date in the bid period after the third date of the bid period so it doesn't ask you if you want to start the bid period early every time you update your slip. Saves fractions of seconds.
Reply
Old 03-18-2026 | 08:20 AM
  #32  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2022
Posts: 302
Likes: 213
Default

Today I acknowledged a QS that reported in 12 hours, and it showed I was #1 at the top in ARCOS. An hour later it's not on my schedule but moving through OOB coverage.

It seems their strategy now is to first make sure a trip is covered via QS, then concurrently run normal coverage to see if they can get to a reserve in time. Several posts on facebook today about the same thing happening.
Reply
Old 03-18-2026 | 08:20 AM
  #33  
Gunfighter's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
1M Airline Miles
On Reserve
Gets Weekends Off
50 Countries Visited
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 5,629
Likes: 654
Default

Originally Posted by hockeypilot44
I didn’t brag. I stated a fact. Every single one of the AE’s this year are awarding widebody captain spots junior to me.

I would go back to 12 hour long call without thinking twice in exchange for only 3 short call per month. I worked here when scheduling actually functioned. It was better and easier to credit more.
Scheduling functioned fine with 18 hour LC. Reverting to 12 won't fix the disaster in CS.
Reply
Old 03-18-2026 | 08:22 AM
  #34  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 5,590
Likes: 346
Default

Originally Posted by Gunfighter
Scheduling functioned fine with 18 hour LC. Reverting to 12 won't fix the disaster in CS.
It’s not the 18 hour long call. It’s the reverting to manual coverage two days prior. This requires more shcedulers since more trips are covered manually. The company has decided scheduling is not important. I will say this has become the most hostile airline I have ever worked for, regionals included.

It wasn’t always like this.
Reply
Old 03-18-2026 | 08:30 AM
  #35  
GutterGuard's Avatar
Line Holder
On Reserve
 
Joined: Sep 2025
Posts: 1,079
Likes: 895
Default

Originally Posted by hockeypilot44
It’s not the 18 hour long call. It’s the reverting to manual coverage two days prior. This requires more shcedulers since more trips are covered manually. The company has decided scheduling is not important. I will say this has become the most hostile airline I have ever worked for, regionals included.

It wasn’t always like this.
"I don't like the way scheduling works, so my solution is to reduce pilot QoL instead of properly staffing the air line."
Reply
Old 03-18-2026 | 08:54 AM
  #36  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2024
Posts: 295
Likes: 142
Default

Originally Posted by immolated
Today I acknowledged a QS that reported in 12 hours, and it showed I was #1 at the top in ARCOS. An hour later it's not on my schedule but moving through OOB coverage.

It seems their strategy now is to first make sure a trip is covered via QS, then concurrently run normal coverage to see if they can get to a reserve in time. Several posts on facebook today about the same thing happening.
Thought they couldn't do QS until 8 hours to trip?
Reply
Old 03-18-2026 | 08:57 AM
  #37  
Roll’n Thunder
Community Influencer
15 Years
On Reserve
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 5,178
Likes: 587
From: Pilot
Default

Originally Posted by Frank Grimes
Thought they couldn't do QS until 8 hours to trip?
They can’t use 23m7 to skip forward to any step of coverage unless it’s within 8 hours to report. But QS is in both the N and O coverage ladders, so theoretically the process could run long enough with no takers to reach QS naturally without using 23m7.
Reply
Old 03-18-2026 | 08:58 AM
  #38  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2021
Posts: 1,331
Likes: 385
Default

Originally Posted by Frank Grimes
Thought they couldn't do QS until 8 hours to trip?
This is a common misconception. 23M7 has the 8-hour limitation, not QS.

What Tennis said.
Reply
Old 03-18-2026 | 09:27 AM
  #39  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2024
Posts: 295
Likes: 142
Default

Originally Posted by tennisguru
They can’t use 23m7 to skip forward to any step of coverage unless it’s within 8 hours to report. But QS is in both the N and O coverage ladders, so theoretically the process could run long enough with no takers to reach QS naturally without using 23m7.
Yeah I know that, just don't think there is any way in hell they got through the coverage ladder fully and got to QS on it's own
I should have said skip to.
Reply
Old 03-18-2026 | 09:36 AM
  #40  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2021
Posts: 1,331
Likes: 385
Default

Originally Posted by Frank Grimes
Yeah I know that, just don't think there is any way in hell they got through the coverage ladder fully and got to QS on it's own
It's possible. They could start coverage after the at 8 AM run for a trip that reports in the evening 2 days out. Plenty of trips make it to GS, sometimes they make it to OOBGS, and every once in awhile they might squeak past that into QS.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
3 green
Delta
493
09-05-2025 07:31 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices