Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Schedule Quality Decreasing >

Schedule Quality Decreasing

Search

Notices

Schedule Quality Decreasing

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-02-2026 | 07:29 PM
  #41  
Gets Weekends Off
10 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 2,019
Likes: 193
Default

Originally Posted by m3113n1a1
Yeah everyone should get paid less to keep trips commutable!
Im not proposing we all suffer for commuting- I’m just pointing out that high ADGs have tradeoffs. Look at Southwest. You want AMs or PMs? All their trips are 12 hour layovers and noncommutable on one end or the other. To some pilots, I’m sure that sounds awesome. To others (like me), this sounds awful. We already have 24:00+ 4-days in the bid packet. If you want them, go bid them. Sometimes I do, sometimes I don’t. I LIKE the flexibility in our current system. Sometimes I bid for high EDP. Sometimes I don’t. With super high ADGs there are tradeoffs. It’s not like 95% of trips are magically going to stay 21:00 block and they pay us 28:00 for the 4-day. The trip construction will turn to money-making barn burners, perhaps requiring less overall pilots. Optimizer will be able to crank to eleven.
Reply
Old 04-02-2026 | 07:35 PM
  #42  
Ropes's Avatar
On Reserve
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 25
Likes: 6
Default

Originally Posted by Planetrain
Im not proposing we all suffer for commuting- I’m just pointing out that high ADGs have tradeoffs. Look at Southwest. You want AMs or PMs? All their trips are 12 hour layovers and noncommutable on one end or the other. To some pilots, I’m sure that sounds awesome. To others (like me), this sounds awful. We already have 24:00+ 4-days in the bid packet. If you want them, go bid them. Sometimes I do, sometimes I don’t. I LIKE the flexibility in our current system. Sometimes I bid for high EDP. Sometimes I don’t. With super high ADGs there are tradeoffs. It’s not like 95% of trips are magically going to stay 21:00 block and they pay us 28:00 for the 4-day. The trip construction will turn to money-making barn burners, perhaps requiring less overall pilots.
All their trips are 12 hour layovers and noncommutable on one end or the other

aww…. That’s cute
Reply
Old 04-02-2026 | 07:44 PM
  #43  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2023
Posts: 234
Likes: 53
Default

Originally Posted by Planetrain
ADGs of 7:00 = 0500 shows and 2300 releases. Kiss commuting goodbye. Maybe to some that’s ok. Me, I’m happy with 5:15. Offers way more flexibility.
There's not enough airplanes to start every rotation that early. So that can't happen.

It might me a lot more one day rotations. It might mean more redeyes. It might mean 3 days credit 21 hours minimum and we all work only 10 days/mo. It might mean a lot of things. My main point is that arbitrarily advocating for the ADG to be lower ins't helping pilots, it's helping the company. Lower ADG gives the optimizer more solution space, not less.
Reply
Old 04-02-2026 | 09:43 PM
  #44  
GogglesPisano's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
20M Airline Miles
10 Years
Gets Weekends Off
50 Countries Visited
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 6,572
Likes: 331
From: Sitting SC at the Five Towns
Default

Originally Posted by Podrick
Hasn’t been 2-man for a few years now, thankfully.
The kicker is we have shorter TATL flights that leave JFK/BOS earlier and are 3-man.
Reply
Old 04-02-2026 | 10:21 PM
  #45  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 5,578
Likes: 237
From: UNA
Default

Originally Posted by GogglesPisano
The kicker is we have shorter TATL flights that leave JFK/BOS earlier and are 3-man.
if I’m not mistaken it’s because of the departure time on the flight back. The non acclimated report times for an early AM Europe departure make it difficult/ impossible to make it work legally, where the late PM departure to Europe has a later report time for the flight back and less likely a 2 pilot crew will time out.

doesn’t make the flight there suck any less though.
Reply
Old 04-03-2026 | 02:50 AM
  #46  
FangsF15's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 8,352
Likes: 1,374
Default

Originally Posted by ohaiyo
There's not enough airplanes to start every rotation that early. So that can't happen.

It might me a lot more one day rotations. It might mean more redeyes. It might mean 3 days credit 21 hours minimum and we all work only 10 days/mo. It might mean a lot of things. My main point is that arbitrarily advocating for the ADG to be lower ins't helping pilots, it's helping the company. Lower ADG gives the optimizer more solution space, not less.
Sure there is. It doesn’t have to be a 0600 departure to be uncommutable. A 0900 departure is also uncommutable.

Keep in mind that there is a sweet spot. The FA’s get way less for the same trip. That’s a huge data point for why a lower ADG is bad. Also, those broken trips will now be worth way less.

But again, ALPA has put higher ADG in the optimizer. I can’t say this loudly enough: you would hate the results. Yes, a few edge cases would be great, but the overall bid pack would be horrible. Even with a 15 or 30 minute addition.
Reply
Old 04-03-2026 | 03:59 AM
  #47  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,883
Likes: 198
Default

Originally Posted by crewdawg
Went back and looked and you're right, but the initial posts really seemed to insinuate that it was something significant.





I seem to remember some discussion about some of our short Europe was going to 2-pilot ops soon, so that may be changing. Short Europe was terrible enough with 3-pilots, can't imagine 2.
I flew a bunch of Europe including AMS and CDG as two man trips. Not fun! The good news is FAR117 makes that a difficult scheduling choice for the company because your duty day on the return leg is so short any delay can cause a cancel. The company can however change the trips to 4 day rotations and avoid the issue. If they do that they need to eat the extra hotel costs and a full day of credit for the two man crew. United is doing this on some EWR trips like BRU. It makes for a crappy 16 day schedule.
Reply
Old 04-03-2026 | 05:19 AM
  #48  
Boatbuilder's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 872
Likes: 85
From: 717a
Default

I was 23 years on the Mad Dog. When it left I had full intent to go to the 320. One good look at the rotations and I said no way. Lack of commutability, short layovers and a lot of block.
Senior on the 717 isn’t a bad place to be. Lot of long layovers, easy days, short legs.
I stopped seeking glamour and exotic locales a long time ago, and I’d rather get a good nights sleep.
Reply
Old 04-03-2026 | 06:19 AM
  #49  
Line Holder
5 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2018
Posts: 334
Likes: 59
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
I flew a bunch of Europe including AMS and CDG as two man trips. Not fun! The good news is FAR117 makes that a difficult scheduling choice for the company because your duty day on the return leg is so short any delay can cause a cancel. The company can however change the trips to 4 day rotations and avoid the issue. If they do that they need to eat the extra hotel costs and a full day of credit for the two man crew. United is doing this on some EWR trips like BRU. It makes for a crappy 16 day schedule.

Crappy for some but gold for others. 48 hrs+ in Europe to get acclimated is, to my mind, the "correct" way physiologically to deal with circadian distruptions across the pond. Everyone is tired on the backside of a normal 3 day Europe, augmented or not. I'll bid a 21 hr ADG 4 day Europe all day long even un-augmented over the now typical 3 day/24 ... its better for my body and my lifestyle and worth the 'efficiency' hit to me.
Reply
Old 04-03-2026 | 06:23 AM
  #50  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,883
Likes: 198
Default

Originally Posted by flightlessbirds
Crappy for some but gold for others. 48 hrs+ in Europe to get acclimated is, to my mind, the "correct" way physiologically to deal with circadian distruptions across the pond. Everyone is tired on the backside of a normal 3 day Europe, augmented or not. I'll bid a 21 hr ADG 4 day Europe all day long even un-augmented over the now typical 3 day/24 ... its better for my body and my lifestyle and worth the 'efficiency' hit to me.
4 on, 3 off, enjoy the layover, home time will be limited.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
PikeAV8R
Major
346
01-02-2018 12:37 PM
ncpilot1996
Part 91 and Low Time
13
10-21-2015 07:10 AM
Prince Albert
Flexjet
0
10-20-2015 03:28 PM
airforcedude
Military
11
02-20-2011 06:19 AM
WingsNthings
Part 91 and Low Time
23
01-11-2011 06:04 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices