Schedule Quality Decreasing
#61
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 5,152
Likes: 130
I’m not a commuter, and haven’t paid a lot of attention to proposed commuter policy changes. Has there ever been a dynamic policy proposed…for instance, that a backup flight is not required for any rotation signing in earlier than 1100? I would think reliability of earlier flights could justify some relief to help produce more commutable rotations and retain optimizer flexibility. And perhaps there’s a soft pay stipend that could be tacked on to any rotation scheduled to release after 2000.
#62
It's not about making those trips worse. Those multi leg days would stay the same. It's about eliminating the few good trips we have left, such as 1 leg days under ADG. Used to have them all the time 5-10+ years ago, now they are there if you want them but few and far between, especially during months that the company turns up the dial on ALV, as identified by the OP. Higher ADG would completely eliminate them.
Let people have the option to bid for those if they want. Or let people bid for the high block trips. Don't force everyone into high block max duty trips.
It's not BS either. As several have said here, the scheduling committee ran trials and the result was awful, even when adding +0.5 ADG.
Don't vote for this unless you get the actual data from your rep and are okay with it.
Let people have the option to bid for those if they want. Or let people bid for the high block trips. Don't force everyone into high block max duty trips.
It's not BS either. As several have said here, the scheduling committee ran trials and the result was awful, even when adding +0.5 ADG.
Don't vote for this unless you get the actual data from your rep and are okay with it.
#63
Squeezing more juice out of the lemon just serves to reduce stability.
#64
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 12,547
Likes: 1,155
I just don't see how they can squeeze much more out of us already on a large majority of bid pack rotations. We're 117 limited by FDP and block, so there's really not a whole lot of wiggle room for the company to crank up the heat on duty periods across the board.
Squeezing more juice out of the lemon just serves to reduce stability.
Squeezing more juice out of the lemon just serves to reduce stability.
#65
Line Holder
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 1,946
Likes: 110
they do not care about fatigue. Not one bit. Because they know that if 10 trips are built to be fatiguing only 1 pilot will call them on it. But they gain the efficiency from the other 9 they would’ve lost by making them all less fatiguing. It’s just math to them. They have the software to predict fatigue and know exactly which trips are fatiguing. They do not care
#66
Moderator
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 7,502
Likes: 501
It would be sweet if they'd actually publish what those "awful" bid packets would look like, for us all to see and judge for ourselves. This was the excuse they gave for leaving the 717 out of 1-day trip mix protections. However, the few times they've put up a fair amount of day trips, the trips were great, the rest of the bid packet was no different than normal. The trips were so terrible that even at sub-20% in seat, I couldn't even sniff them.
#67
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 4,156
Likes: 587
I’m not a commuter, and haven’t paid a lot of attention to proposed commuter policy changes. Has there ever been a dynamic policy proposed…for instance, that a backup flight is not required for any rotation signing in earlier than 1100? I would think reliability of earlier flights could justify some relief to help produce more commutable rotations and retain optimizer flexibility. And perhaps there’s a soft pay stipend that could be tacked on to any rotation scheduled to release after 2000.
#68
[QUOTE=immolated;4019355]
Let people have the option to bid for those if they want. Or let people bid for the high block trips. Don't force everyone into high block max duty trips.
Trust me, no one is choosing or wants those high block trips. They are being forced into it by juniority. The Junior pilots are also less likely to call in fatigued. Most of these trips come within 30minutes of max FDP not much more can be squeezed out of it unless the company goes 3/3/3 and 3/3/3/3. Now if the company responds to the increased ADG by making more or all trips worse; fatigue calls and FDP exceedances will increase dramatically as more senior pilots fly these crappy rotations.
Let people have the option to bid for those if they want. Or let people bid for the high block trips. Don't force everyone into high block max duty trips.
Trust me, no one is choosing or wants those high block trips. They are being forced into it by juniority. The Junior pilots are also less likely to call in fatigued. Most of these trips come within 30minutes of max FDP not much more can be squeezed out of it unless the company goes 3/3/3 and 3/3/3/3. Now if the company responds to the increased ADG by making more or all trips worse; fatigue calls and FDP exceedances will increase dramatically as more senior pilots fly these crappy rotations.
#69
Line Holder
Joined: Oct 2024
Posts: 295
Likes: 142
Trust me, no one is choosing or wants those high block trips. They are being forced into it by juniority. The Junior pilots are also less likely to call in fatigued. Most of these trips come within 30minutes of max FDP not much more can be squeezed out of it unless the company goes 3/3/3 and 3/3/3/3. Now if the company responds to the increased ADG by making more or all trips worse; fatigue calls and FDP exceedances will increase dramatically as more senior pilots fly these crappy rotations.
Last edited by Frank Grimes; 04-04-2026 at 01:38 AM. Reason: Error
#70
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,883
Likes: 198
they do not care about fatigue. Not one bit. Because they know that if 10 trips are built to be fatiguing only 1 pilot will call them on it. But they gain the efficiency from the other 9 they would’ve lost by making them all less fatiguing. It’s just math to them. They have the software to predict fatigue and know exactly which trips are fatiguing. They do not care
Every change also comes with consequences some known and others not predicted. Lengthened layover time in the room forced 30 hour layovers that led to 17 to 19 hour 4 day trips. Contractual changes led to cramming as much flying as possibly into the other 3 days with the ADG increases. Pilots love turns but increased ADG values make turns hard to build without large credit increases. You can’t pull the long legs out of the pool without substantially running up credit on the 3 and 4 day trips. Pilots also want what they don’t have. When we had 13 hour 3 day trips and 17 hour 4 day trips Pilots screamed they want to go to work and fly as much as possible. When we got better work rules that accomplished exactly that the cries were where have all the good layovers and fun trips gone! Your best single tool to improve fatigue issues is to write up every single issue and request a reply. That does have an effect yet most pilots don’t bother.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



