Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Schedule Quality Decreasing >

Schedule Quality Decreasing

Search

Notices

Schedule Quality Decreasing

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-06-2026 | 07:54 AM
  #101  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Jan 2025
Posts: 191
Likes: 109
Default

Originally Posted by DWC CAP10 USAF
No the 73 hasn't been.

While some ALV's have been the high 70's / low 80's a few times over the last 12 months, the TLV is little above 74 for the A's and little below 74 for the B's
True for the 73As but you're wrong about the Bs. TLV is by systemwide seat, not category. The TLV for May 73Bs with the 12 month loopback is 77:50. TLV has been above 77 since February. For March it was 77:59.
Reply
Old 04-06-2026 | 07:56 AM
  #102  
FangsF15's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 8,354
Likes: 1,379
Default

Originally Posted by Bergman
But didn’t crew resources say a few months ago that their plan was to hire for retirements and support 3-4% growth through higher ALV since TLV was so low?!? SMH.

BOHICA. This summer is going to be “a little hot”.
Yes, they did say that. However, that was when the hiring target was “attrition”, which would be 500. Since then, the C-Suite directed a large increase in hiring due to massive 23M7 payments. It’s always changing, but current hiring targets are in the 1500+ range.

But two things can be true at once. They can hire bigly, and also run it a little hot.
Reply
Old 04-06-2026 | 07:59 AM
  #103  
FangsF15's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 8,354
Likes: 1,379
Default

Originally Posted by CBreezy
You should speak to the former scheduling chair and current ATL CA Rep. They ran it when he was there. You think he would just make up the result?

And "they" don't do anything. A computer program does. If it doesn't need to add those turns to eliminate credit on trips, it won't. But CARMEN will do whatever it can to optimize with a 6 hour ADG and the results, historically when it has been tested have resulted in very negative outcomes.
This. Asking questions is healthy and understandable. But to dismiss those of us who have been through this, and haveasked the question beforeis ill advised.

Originally Posted by Steelship123
Now the ALV is up to 82 hours and a reserve guarantee of 80 for every 320B position for May.
For clarity, the ALV is always the same for every fleet by seat. IOW, all 320 B’s will always be the same.
Reply
Old 04-06-2026 | 08:02 AM
  #104  
DWC CAP10 USAF's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
Veteran: Air Force
Liked
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 4,027
Likes: 217
From: Looking left
Default

Originally Posted by Bazinga
True for the 73As but you're wrong about the Bs. TLV is by systemwide seat, not category. The TLV for May 73Bs with the 12 month loopback is 77:50. TLV has been above 77 since February. For March it was 77:59.
I'm well aware that ALV/TLV is system wide, not different for each category.

The latest bid monitor report on the ALPA page is from Feb, so you are either more of a search ninja than I at finding a more recent bid monitor report, or if you are just doing the math yourself. If the later then I'll concede becauseI didn't put pen to paper to do it old school because I'm not in that category so I don' have a vested interesting in gonkulating beyond what ALPA provides.
Reply
Old 04-06-2026 | 08:07 AM
  #105  
FangsF15's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 8,354
Likes: 1,379
Default

Originally Posted by Nono
We might want to try for a minimum daily guarantee vs an average daily guarantee.

For instance with an ADG…. Let’s says there’s an easy two day trip that has both days below the ADG it incentivizes the company can add a really long third day to the front or back of the rotation which then makes the trip average out to be close
to ADG. Thus reducing our QOL.

With a min daily guarantee the company can add that long third day, but they have to pay you for it above min guarantee and they would have to pay you min guarantee on the easy days. With that said I’m not sure how many trips in the bid packets would pay more with the change.

I was told that SkyWest’s contract pays a minimum daily guarantee fwiw.

open to feed back… thoughts.
I cringe a little every time someone suggests a scheduling practice used a regional. As a general rule, it’s almost always going to make things worse on the whole.

Edge cases are wholly unsuitable for anything other than illustrating a point. They don’t generally work writ large, when you build a bid package from with tens of thousands of block hours.

MCD instead of ADG is a terrible idea. It would destroy QOL through trip constriction. As noted, we already have MCD (new in C19) of 2:30, and was really intended to make the days surrounding a 30-hour layover suck a little less. The fact MCD makes you more pay for releasing after midnight is an unintended fringe benefit.
Reply
Old 04-06-2026 | 08:10 AM
  #106  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Jan 2025
Posts: 191
Likes: 109
Default

Originally Posted by DWC CAP10 USAF
I'm well aware that ALV/TLV is system wide, not different for each category.

The latest bid monitor report on the ALPA page is from Feb, so you are either more of a search ninja than I at finding a more recent bid monitor report, or if you are just doing the math yourself. If the later then I'll concede becauseI didn't put pen to paper to do it old school because I'm not in that category so I don' have a vested interesting in gonkulating beyond what ALPA provides.
You are correct, the latest bid monitor report on MEC website is for Feb. It shows 73B is 77.28 so not close to "a little under 74." And, yes, I did the math since February to come up with those numbers.
Reply
Old 04-06-2026 | 08:15 AM
  #107  
DWC CAP10 USAF's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
Veteran: Air Force
Liked
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 4,027
Likes: 217
From: Looking left
Default

Originally Posted by Bazinga
You are correct, the latest bid monitor report on MEC website is for Feb. It shows 73B is 77.28 so not close to "a little under 74." And, yes, I did the math since February to come up with those numbers.
Sh!te....I mistakenly read the ER line right above the 73 line....7ERB is 73.81 hence my "little under" comment....My bad!!!!

Time to make eye doc appointment to update my prescription.
Reply
Old 04-06-2026 | 08:17 AM
  #108  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Jan 2025
Posts: 191
Likes: 109
Default

Originally Posted by DWC CAP10 USAF
Sh!te....I mistakenly read the ER line right above the 73 line....7ERB is 73.81 hence my "little under" comment....My bad!!!!

Time to make eye doc appointment to update my prescription.
haha all good, been there!
Reply
Old 04-06-2026 | 08:28 AM
  #109  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2020
Posts: 2,250
Likes: 108
Default

Originally Posted by KC135
Ha, this is the way. I'm considering downgrading back to FO.
I know #2 777 FO for UAL at a base and last year he had cleared over $650K by end of August with about 200hrs of block for the year to date then.......
Reply
Old 04-06-2026 | 08:30 AM
  #110  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 5,582
Likes: 237
From: UNA
Default

Originally Posted by FangsF15
I cringe a little every time someone suggests a scheduling practice used a regional. As a general rule, it’s almost always going to make things worse on the whole.
gotta disagree here fangs. While on the whole things are certainly better here, that doesn’t mean everything is. For example we had leg by leg cancellation pay, bid for our IQ schedule, could drop partial trips, couldn’t be involuntarily rerouted into a day off, and got uniform allowances. Before this last contract we had situations where we got better reroute pay too.


as far as MDG, NW had that before BK. Being wary of the consequences of MDG is smart, but the idea as a whole it’s bad just because regionals use it doesn’t follow for me. I would be curious to compare the results of trips produced by the following 3 scenarios
- current
- keep ADG 5:15 and raise MDG to 3:00
- get rid of ADG and raise MDG to 4:30
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
PikeAV8R
Major
346
01-02-2018 12:37 PM
ncpilot1996
Part 91 and Low Time
13
10-21-2015 07:10 AM
Prince Albert
Flexjet
0
10-20-2015 03:28 PM
airforcedude
Military
11
02-20-2011 06:19 AM
WingsNthings
Part 91 and Low Time
23
01-11-2011 06:04 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices