Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Schedule Quality Decreasing >

Schedule Quality Decreasing

Search

Notices

Schedule Quality Decreasing

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-06-2026 | 04:07 AM
  #91  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2024
Posts: 393
Likes: 76
Default

Originally Posted by Nono
We might want to try for a minimum daily guarantee vs an average daily guarantee.

For instance with an ADG…. Let’s says there’s an easy two day trip that has both days below the ADG it incentivizes the company can add a really long third day to the front or back of the rotation which then makes the trip average out to be close
to ADG. Thus reducing our QOL.

With a min daily guarantee the company can add that long third day, but they have to pay you for it above min guarantee and they would have to pay you min guarantee on the easy days. With that said I’m not sure how many trips in the bid packets would pay more with the change.

I was told that SkyWest’s contract pays a minimum daily guarantee fwiw.

open to feed back… thoughts.
There is already MCD of 2:30. This is why a REG pilot gets 4:30 for blocking in at/after 2330, and a RES pilot gets 2:30 toward guarantee and 2:00.
Reply
Old 04-06-2026 | 04:07 AM
  #92  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 925
Likes: 82
From: B737 FO
Default

Originally Posted by CBreezy
MDG is an option but it'll have to be lower than 5:15. A 5:15 MDG would likely end most 1 leg days to start or finish a trip
This is what I tell other pilots I fly with when MDG comes up. Not necessarily for or against it, just know that there's no free lunch and MDG would have consequences for trip construction. Our current trips wouldn't just magically pay more.
Reply
Old 04-06-2026 | 04:31 AM
  #93  
PilotJ3's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
15 Years
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 3,877
Likes: 122
Default

Originally Posted by BlueSkies
This is what I tell other pilots I fly with when MDG comes up. Not necessarily for or against it, just know that there's no free lunch and MDG would have consequences for trip construction. Our current trips wouldn't just magically pay more.
Correct. It will be better to attack pay in other ways. Better pay scale, soft pay, vacation accrual/Pay 5:15, recurrent pay, RR pay, GS pay, company maxing the 401k regardless of longevity, etc etc.

Touching ADG, is not smart, only for those that are workaholics, but then eventually life will catch up with them and will change their tune.
Reply
Old 04-06-2026 | 04:49 AM
  #94  
Bergman's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 657
Likes: 64
From: Slingin' Gear and Drinkin' Beer
Default

Originally Posted by Bazinga
73NB has been at or very close to max TLV for a few months now. 320B is is simply catching up.
But didn’t crew resources say a few months ago that their plan was to hire for retirements and support 3-4% growth through higher ALV since TLV was so low?!? SMH.

BOHICA. This summer is going to be “a little hot”.
Reply
Old 04-06-2026 | 06:36 AM
  #95  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 1,205
Likes: 31
Default

Originally Posted by Steelship123
Is it just me, or has anyone else noticed a continual downward trend in schedule quality, specifically on the 320? It seems like every month that goes by the trips get worse with longer duty days, tons of block time and short overnights. Fewer and fewer good trips to even bid for in the first place. Plus the line credit window keeps getting pushed higher each month. I’ve noticed this specifically since about a year ago around Q2 2025 up through the current bid period. It seems nobody holds anything tolerable unless you’re in the top 10% in your base and seat. What is going on?? Is this all intentional by the company?
Isn’t RG’s fault plus not flowing more from the Wholly owned ?🤷‍♂️
Reply
Old 04-06-2026 | 06:37 AM
  #96  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Jan 2025
Posts: 191
Likes: 109
Default

Originally Posted by Bergman
But didn’t crew resources say a few months ago that their plan was to hire for retirements and support 3-4% growth through higher ALV since TLV was so low?!? SMH.

BOHICA. This summer is going to be “a little hot”.
they are attempting to keep their word on that with 237 73NB spots (145 in ATL) on the current and previous AE. obviously too little too late for summer so definitely a big SMH to that.
Reply
Old 04-06-2026 | 06:49 AM
  #97  
Gunfighter's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
1M Airline Miles
On Reserve
Gets Weekends Off
50 Countries Visited
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 5,632
Likes: 656
Default

Originally Posted by Bazinga
they are attempting to keep their word on that with 237 73NB spots (145 in ATL) on the current and previous AE. obviously too little too late for summer so definitely a big SMH to that.
Isn't that double counting? Unfilled vacancies from the last AE are replaced with vacancies from the current AE.
Reply
Old 04-06-2026 | 07:11 AM
  #98  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Jan 2025
Posts: 191
Likes: 109
Default

Originally Posted by Gunfighter
Isn't that double counting? Unfilled vacancies from the last AE are replaced with vacancies from the current AE.
I have to ask for a source for that claim. Unfilled vacancies are for new hires. I acknowledge I could be very wrong but given the volume of new hires in April and May, I don't see how this could be carry over vacancies. I skimmed the current AE email and there's no reference to this happening at all.

Last edited by Bazinga; 04-06-2026 at 07:35 AM. Reason: grammar
Reply
Old 04-06-2026 | 07:44 AM
  #99  
DWC CAP10 USAF's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
Veteran: Air Force
Liked
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 4,027
Likes: 217
From: Looking left
Default

Originally Posted by Bazinga
73NB has been at or very close to max TLV for a few months now. 320B is is simply catching up.
No the 73 hasn't been.

While some ALV's have been the high 70's / low 80's a few times over the last 12 months, the TLV is little above 74 for the A's and little below 74 for the B's
Reply
Old 04-06-2026 | 07:53 AM
  #100  
FangsF15's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 8,354
Likes: 1,379
Default

Originally Posted by Bazinga
I have to ask for a source for that claim. Unfilled vacancies are for new hires. I acknowledge I could be very wrong but given the volume of new hires in April and May, I don't see how this could be carry over vacancies. I skimmed the current AE email and there's no reference to this happening at all.
You are indeed very wrong. Source: Bob S, Managing Director of Crew Resources, when he was the running AE’s. Also, ALPA.

Fact: Each AE resets the vacancies which may be given to NH’s.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
PikeAV8R
Major
346
01-02-2018 12:37 PM
ncpilot1996
Part 91 and Low Time
13
10-21-2015 07:10 AM
Prince Albert
Flexjet
0
10-20-2015 03:28 PM
airforcedude
Military
11
02-20-2011 06:19 AM
WingsNthings
Part 91 and Low Time
23
01-11-2011 06:04 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices