Notices

Unity of Purpose

Old 04-03-2026 | 01:37 PM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 5,589
Likes: 346
Default

This is possible. Giving up auto accept is the key to unlocking our gains.
Reply
Old 04-03-2026 | 01:39 PM
  #12  
GutterGuard's Avatar
Thread Starter
Line Holder
On Reserve
 
Joined: Sep 2025
Posts: 1,079
Likes: 895
Default

Originally Posted by CBreezy
Because we are at war with an oil producing country. It serves our best interest to get this done as fast as possible as long as the terms are right. If the terms aren't right, there is significantly more risk now than a year ago of economic conditions not supporting our ask. But, as the email clearly said, if the company wants to play hardball, we will be forced to drag things out (read: 23m7 300% pain for years).
Weren't we in a hurry to sign the last contract because "the economy is going to tank any minute, let's lock this in."

Sounds similar to the whole not pay-banding certain fleets because "they won't be around much longer."

Not to mention we've been at war with oil producing countries for...how many decades now?
Reply
Old 04-03-2026 | 01:43 PM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 4,156
Likes: 587
Default

Originally Posted by hockeypilot44
This is possible. Giving up auto accept is the key to unlocking our gains.
The auto-accepters have given us big leverage though. Thank an auto-accepter.
Old 04-03-2026 | 01:49 PM
  #14  
FangsF15's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 8,352
Likes: 1,374
Default

Originally Posted by m3113n1a1
The auto-accepters have given us big leverage though. Thank an auto-accepter.
LOL, ironic, but accurate.

Originally Posted by PowderPilot2016
I think this is a great strategy. Go for mutual gains. Company wants things we want things get it locked in. They want to play hard ball then go the distance.
​​​​​​​
+1. We really are in the drivers seat. I understand reluctance to use our leverage, but an early contract with big gains puts UA under the gun to pattern bargain and leapfrog us.
Reply
Old 04-03-2026 | 01:51 PM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 12,547
Likes: 1,155
Default

Originally Posted by GutterGuard
Weren't we in a hurry to sign the last contract because "the economy is going to tank any minute, let's lock this in."

Sounds similar to the whole not pay-banding certain fleets because "they won't be around much longer."

Not to mention we've been at war with oil producing countries for...how many decades now?
We paused negotiating during the last contract because of COVID which was absolutely the right thing to do. And we rushed to sign an agreement because United and American were about to bend our leverage over a barrel. Our last contract has absolutely nothing to do with any economy tanking. In fact, the economy was roaring back when we signed.

And no, some energy experts predict that 20-30% of oil infrastructure has been destroyed in the middle east. I think you'll find it hard to find a comparison for this level of damage to energy infrastructure in the last 50 years.

And for the record, I'm not suggesting we rush to an agreement. Just that it's in our best interest to not drag out negotiations unnecessarily in the event this conflict isn't wrapped up as quickly as is being advertised
Reply
Old 04-03-2026 | 01:56 PM
  #16  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 51
Likes: 37
Default

Originally Posted by FangsF15
LOL, ironic, but accurate.



+1. We really are in the drivers seat. I understand reluctance to use our leverage, but an early contract with big gains puts UA under the gun to pattern bargain and leapfrog us.
This ^^^^^^^
Reply
Old 04-03-2026 | 02:22 PM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2023
Posts: 3,517
Likes: 1,045
Default

Originally Posted by CBreezy
The correct word is actually "there."
Lol get Cook to fix my auto fill then and make it fill grammatically correct. Since you probably double as an apple engineer, advisor to the BOD etc etc


Also I will on occasion misspell or misuse words because it's like trolling for Breezy. Always get a bite.
Reply
Old 04-03-2026 | 02:25 PM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2023
Posts: 3,517
Likes: 1,045
Default

Originally Posted by m3113n1a1
While that may be true, the email implies that it is DALPA who suggested the shorter term and that initial discussions with executives "suggest" there is "some interest" from the company in this path.
I don't think it implies that.

the nuances here are the company really really wants something and our MEC/NC are measuring and tempering their public messaging

This like what your second contract here?
Reply
Old 04-03-2026 | 02:30 PM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2023
Posts: 3,517
Likes: 1,045
Default

Originally Posted by CBreezy
We paused negotiating during the last contract because of COVID which was absolutely the right thing to do. And we rushed to sign an agreement because United and American were about to bend our leverage over a barrel. Our last contract has absolutely nothing to do with any economy tanking. In fact, the economy was roaring back when we signed.

And no, some energy experts predict that 20-30% of oil infrastructure has been destroyed in the middle east. I think you'll find it hard to find a comparison for this level of damage to energy infrastructure in the last 50 years.

And for the record, I'm not suggesting we rush to an agreement. Just that it's in our best interest to not drag out negotiations unnecessarily in the event this conflict isn't wrapped up as quickly as is being advertised
I just spit club soda all over my phone.

Only you could contort some very basic messaging from the MEC into rambling babble of your distrorted economic understanding.
Reply
Old 04-03-2026 | 02:33 PM
  #20  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 12,547
Likes: 1,155
Default

Originally Posted by Hotel Kilo
I just spit club soda all over my phone.

Only you could contort some very basic messaging from the MEC into rambling babble of your distrorted economic understanding.
Oh. We aren't allowed to have opinions here? Only you? By all means, continue.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
FTv3
UPS
12
03-07-2026 05:19 PM
HandyUghes
Union Talk
0
08-02-2018 04:27 AM
rjlavender
Major
42
10-13-2006 07:08 AM
RedeyeAV8r
Cargo
2
03-01-2006 11:32 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices