Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?
I"m just worried about the process.
My point was not to attack anybody personally or question their motives or integrity.
I just think we should all understand that 6 or 8 guys decided this was going to be our contract.
The administration didn't bother with the membership or the elected reps at all.
Management called them in early and offered them a deal and they took it.
Now, after the fact, they're selling it to the reps and membership.
I haven't decided if I will vote for the TA yet but I'm concerned about how it was arrived at.
If the Master Chairman has this much power, maybe in the future he should at least be elected by the pilots. No offense to the individual reps, but as a body they seem pretty much impotent. They are bystanders just like the rest of us.
My point was not to attack anybody personally or question their motives or integrity.
I just think we should all understand that 6 or 8 guys decided this was going to be our contract.
The administration didn't bother with the membership or the elected reps at all.
Management called them in early and offered them a deal and they took it.
Now, after the fact, they're selling it to the reps and membership.
I haven't decided if I will vote for the TA yet but I'm concerned about how it was arrived at.
If the Master Chairman has this much power, maybe in the future he should at least be elected by the pilots. No offense to the individual reps, but as a body they seem pretty much impotent. They are bystanders just like the rest of us.
OK, Check, and I did not take it as a personal attack on any of them. I have meet, talk to and know many of these pilots. They are pilots btw. They are all easy to talk to and I enjoy the conversations I have had with many of them. Its not a personality issue. They all can pass the H.A.G.G test; He's a good guy.
What we need to do is two things. First, decide if we should separate the process from the product. Do we blindly look away from the TA(product) because the process was not explicitly followed even though in the end the vote was 14-5 and there is cover to call in to question if the process was even gerrymandered? (The assertion will be made and the vote used to say you are full of bull)
Second, if we choose not to separate the two, what is your reasoning?
Third, if we do separate the two and judge the product on its pros and cons, what is next if:
It passes by a wide margin? Is there any point in trying to correct a perceived wrong by calling in to question the people that you have listed?
If it fails or passes by a small margin: Is there the gumption to force the reps who will be going back to the table to deal with the repercussions of allowing the process to be subverted and in kind the Administration, or is it too divisive? Is there even the desire by this group?
Serious questions that each pilot needs to answer.
Now we're just justifying why we aren't worth what we're asking for in the survey. Just a few months ago, many here were touting "Time to get paid, with interest"... It isn't too quick for us to see a few shiny coins in this TA, and stop looking at the long term impact of this TA.
Do you think this TA is only 18 months long? We are gonna have to expand that much negotiating capital to, again, "recapture" everything this TA fails, and guess what, in 18 months, we definitely won't know what kind of environment we'll be in.
Our fight for QOL, pay, and every other improvements are a constant battle. We drop the ball in this one, and we're gonna reap the results in the next TA, the one after that, and so forth. We deserve the 16% raise and much much more.
Do you think this TA is only 18 months long? We are gonna have to expand that much negotiating capital to, again, "recapture" everything this TA fails, and guess what, in 18 months, we definitely won't know what kind of environment we'll be in.
Our fight for QOL, pay, and every other improvements are a constant battle. We drop the ball in this one, and we're gonna reap the results in the next TA, the one after that, and so forth. We deserve the 16% raise and much much more.
Baja.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 115
Likes: 0
I heard the DTW reps were not invited to their own roadshow. You think it'll be a sales job?
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 922
Likes: 0
From: Decoupled
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,518
Likes: 0
From: B737 CA
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 922
Likes: 0
From: Decoupled
Did these men get it right?
Lee Moak
Tim O'Malley
Parri Olmstead
Mike Pinho
Rick Dominguez
Roger White
Rich Harwood
Ken Rogers
Let's not kid ourselves. I undoubtedly left a few names off the list but these are the men who wrote this contract. With stunning speed, the whole intricate (and time consuming) "process" was circumvented.
When we cast our vote the question we need to answer is do we trust the judgment of the handful of people who brought us this contract? This is not the contract the pilots wanted and it is not the contract the MEC wanted.
This was done by a very small group of people who decided what they thought was best for Delta Air Lines and the Delta pilots. They largely disregarded the survey, excluded the elected reps and cut a deal. They then used the powerful machinery at their disposal to get it out to membership ratification. The information and communication resources they control are formidable. They overwhelmed our MEC reps with National's lawyers, economists, political types warning about our chances at the NMB, etc. etc. They are doing the same with the pilot group as a whole.
Make no mistake. These are smart guys. Big picture guys. They've been in power a long time. They are not management but they clearly view themselves as managers of the pilot group. They are pilot advocates and they want everything they can get for the pilots but they also see themselves as responsible for the corporation's health. They believe deeply in the philosophy of labor participation in "corporate governance". They place great value on a pilot member of the board of directors. etc. etc.
I haven't seen the survey but it seems obvious that in many areas these people substituted their judgment for the collective wishes of the pilot group and our elected reps.
On the other hand, "Time value of money" is not just a slogan or cliche. It is real. The dysfunctional, anti-labor NMB is also real. These men made a strategic decision to make an end run around the long, torturous, drawn out NMB negotiation and mediation system that has undeniably been broken for the last decade. That may have been a stroke of brilliance and the best thing that ever happened or it may have cost us hundreds of millions. Would the Railway Labor Act have worked for us or slowly smothered us? That's the decision we have to make. Will we really do better by taking that long road?
It's done. Fait accompli. We have a TA. We are going to vote.
We need to decide -- did these men get it right?
Lee Moak
Tim O'Malley
Parri Olmstead
Mike Pinho
Rick Dominguez
Roger White
Rich Harwood
Ken Rogers
Let's not kid ourselves. I undoubtedly left a few names off the list but these are the men who wrote this contract. With stunning speed, the whole intricate (and time consuming) "process" was circumvented.
When we cast our vote the question we need to answer is do we trust the judgment of the handful of people who brought us this contract? This is not the contract the pilots wanted and it is not the contract the MEC wanted.
This was done by a very small group of people who decided what they thought was best for Delta Air Lines and the Delta pilots. They largely disregarded the survey, excluded the elected reps and cut a deal. They then used the powerful machinery at their disposal to get it out to membership ratification. The information and communication resources they control are formidable. They overwhelmed our MEC reps with National's lawyers, economists, political types warning about our chances at the NMB, etc. etc. They are doing the same with the pilot group as a whole.
Make no mistake. These are smart guys. Big picture guys. They've been in power a long time. They are not management but they clearly view themselves as managers of the pilot group. They are pilot advocates and they want everything they can get for the pilots but they also see themselves as responsible for the corporation's health. They believe deeply in the philosophy of labor participation in "corporate governance". They place great value on a pilot member of the board of directors. etc. etc.
I haven't seen the survey but it seems obvious that in many areas these people substituted their judgment for the collective wishes of the pilot group and our elected reps.
On the other hand, "Time value of money" is not just a slogan or cliche. It is real. The dysfunctional, anti-labor NMB is also real. These men made a strategic decision to make an end run around the long, torturous, drawn out NMB negotiation and mediation system that has undeniably been broken for the last decade. That may have been a stroke of brilliance and the best thing that ever happened or it may have cost us hundreds of millions. Would the Railway Labor Act have worked for us or slowly smothered us? That's the decision we have to make. Will we really do better by taking that long road?
It's done. Fait accompli. We have a TA. We are going to vote.
We need to decide -- did these men get it right?
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 922
Likes: 0
From: Decoupled
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 922
Likes: 0
From: Decoupled
I"m just worried about the process.
My point was not to attack anybody personally or question their motives or integrity.
I just think we should all understand that 6 or 8 guys decided this was going to be our contract.
The administration didn't bother with the membership or the elected reps at all.
Management called them in early and offered them a deal and they took it.
Now, after the fact, they're selling it to the reps and membership.
I haven't decided if I will vote for the TA yet but I'm concerned about how it was arrived at.
If the Master Chairman has this much power, maybe in the future he should at least be elected by the pilots. No offense to the individual reps, but as a body they seem pretty much impotent. They are bystanders just like the rest of us.
My point was not to attack anybody personally or question their motives or integrity.
I just think we should all understand that 6 or 8 guys decided this was going to be our contract.
The administration didn't bother with the membership or the elected reps at all.
Management called them in early and offered them a deal and they took it.
Now, after the fact, they're selling it to the reps and membership.
I haven't decided if I will vote for the TA yet but I'm concerned about how it was arrived at.
If the Master Chairman has this much power, maybe in the future he should at least be elected by the pilots. No offense to the individual reps, but as a body they seem pretty much impotent. They are bystanders just like the rest of us.
The LEC members who voted no will be marginalized. Resistance is futile. That's the way it has always worked at DALPA.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post





