![]() |
|
Originally Posted by SailorJerry
(Post 1211783)
Yes so by immediately voting NO tomorrow you'll ensure that all the flying in the world can be transferred to rehabbed 50 seaters while Delta furloughs. Yes. Smart. I like the way you think. It's crisp and wordly and not in the slightest bit selfish or entitled.
I agree, the economy sucks and DAL will move capacity to where it makes sense and is most profitable. This TA will not stop that if it is voted down or not. The ER guys (i am one of them) will just fly the 737 for todays rates and the sting will be that much more. I do not follow logic the previous post, sounds compelling but non sensical. |
Originally Posted by SailorJerry
(Post 1211783)
Yes so by immediately voting NO tomorrow you'll ensure that all the flying in the world can be transferred to rehabbed 50 seaters while Delta furloughs. Yes. Smart. I like the way you think. It's crisp and wordly and not in the slightest bit selfish or entitled.
What are you talking about? You don't make any sense. This sounds entitled/selfish? Based on what, the realization that the company's promises of growth are smoke and mirrors. If we reduce widebody flying I don't think we will need more pilots....there are more concessions in this TA than there are positives. I will vote no tomorrow because this TA was a rush job and it falls short of my expectations in many areas, plain and simple. |
Originally Posted by SailorJerry
(Post 1211773)
How many TAs would you shoot down to get that sweet Canadian lovin? One? Two? 10?
I'm trying to judge if you're committed or insane. I'm leaning towards the latter. |
Originally Posted by FIIGMO
(Post 1211787)
We will pay for any improvements in another TA, we may get 5% more but we will give it up somewhere else. It is a negotiation. .
|
Originally Posted by johnso29
(Post 1211794)
When you can make mature, reasonable, debates I'll re-engage you. Until then, I'm out. You're not helping your cause.
|
Originally Posted by texavia
(Post 1211797)
Then why bother? Better off with my union dues staying in my pocket, instead of paying admission to a zero sum game.
|
Originally Posted by FIIGMO
(Post 1211807)
I am not sure where dues come into play. My point is really that DALPA can only go back and negotiate again. Demanding is not going to do it IMO. The company will not give in unless they get something in return. Zero would be turning this TA down and going back, you would still be paying dues. This TA and its time frame is a positive in tough economic times. I am willing to move forward and capitalize on further opportunities.
|
Originally Posted by Elvis90
(Post 1211800)
I've put Sailor on my ignore list...I tried to engage him in a thoughtful discussion and I like hearing differing opinions, but he resorted to condescension & general rudeness. I'm sure his heart is broken.
|
Originally Posted by texavia
(Post 1211797)
Then why bother? Better off with my union dues staying in my pocket, instead of paying admission to a zero sum game.
Anyway, sorta TIC......only sorta |
Originally Posted by Elvis90
(Post 1211765)
I plan to do my part.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:31 AM. |
|
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands