Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search
Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-22-2012, 03:07 AM
  #103751  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,343
Default

Originally Posted by capncrunch View Post
This language is ridiculous. My favorite part is "if they are found" as if mgmt doesn't know what's happening.

Seeing how they operate the ratios with our JVs there is now doubt they will push the limits as far as they can as long as they can. This will not be in our favor. How some folks think mgmt is going to be honorable when they don't have foceable language to do so is shocking. When mgmt screwed the pilots during bankruptcy and then gave themselves a bonus, that was the fool me once. Fool yourself again and there is nobody to blame but yourself.

My NO vote was enjoyable to submit. My only worry was that I did it too soon. There is no question ALPA is watching the numbers daily and if things are not going their way expect to see more folks in ops. I suspect if ops gets more crowded with ALPA folks the vote is not going as planned.

ALPA has no access to the numbers. This has been stated many times. It would also be a violation of federal election law. If you think the reps you elected are going to violate federal law and risk losing everything in life to illegally monitor an election then perhaps you need to get some help. It would also destroy all credibility of the company running the election and lead to their almost immediate shutdown and liquidation.
sailingfun is online now  
Old 06-22-2012, 03:35 AM
  #103752  
Gets Weekends Off
 
RonRicco's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Position: Captain
Posts: 827
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun View Post
ALPA has no access to the numbers. This has been stated many times. It would also be a violation of federal election law. If you think the reps you elected are going to violate federal law and risk losing everything in life to illegally monitor an election then perhaps you need to get some help. It would also destroy all credibility of the company running the election and lead to their almost immediate shutdown and liquidation.
Which really makes you wonder Sailing, are the posters that continuously make these sort of assertions that uninformed, or are they just making making intentional false statements?

To give them the benefit of the doubt, I will assume they are just uninformed which gives even more justification to the lounge presence if only to correct such misinformation.
RonRicco is offline  
Old 06-22-2012, 03:53 AM
  #103753  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2009
Position: C560XL/XLS/XLS+
Posts: 1,278
Default

Originally Posted by RonRicco View Post
Which really makes you wonder Sailing, are the posters that continuously make these sort of assertions that uninformed, or are they just making making intentional false statements?

To give them the benefit of the doubt, I will assume they are just uninformed which gives even more justification to the lounge presence if only to correct such misinformation.
They are intentionally making false statements to influence pilots into voting no, or to change their vote to a no.
dalad is offline  
Old 06-22-2012, 03:59 AM
  #103754  
veut gagner à la loterie
 
forgot to bid's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Light Chop
Posts: 23,286
Default

Originally Posted by Ferd149 View Post
F*¥k the Miami Heat!
Sorry Ferd.
forgot to bid is offline  
Old 06-22-2012, 05:15 AM
  #103755  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Boomer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: blueJet
Posts: 4,517
Default

Originally Posted by forgot to bid View Post
Newk....

That's an old firebomber trick - just as you dump your load, scrape the wingtip into the soil and flip a little extra dirt on the fire. They call it a Neptune Punch.

Newk always asks for ship 16, cause she looks two years older than that.
Boomer is offline  
Old 06-22-2012, 05:49 AM
  #103756  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Ragtop Day's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2010
Position: B737 FO
Posts: 166
Default

Originally Posted by Weed View Post
Sorry if it's already been answered.
In Open Time, Trips Assigned, there is now Ps and Pw along with W-White Slip, Y-Yellow Slip.

What is Ps Pw?

Thanks
Not offical, but from what I can tell Ps=swap w/pot, Pw=beyond next day WS.
Ragtop Day is offline  
Old 06-22-2012, 06:21 AM
  #103757  
Gets Weekends Off
 
DogWhisperer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2008
Position: MD-88 F/O
Posts: 1,004
Default

.............

Last edited by DogWhisperer; 06-22-2012 at 06:42 AM. Reason: Delelted
DogWhisperer is offline  
Old 06-22-2012, 06:21 AM
  #103758  
Gets Weekends Off
 
DogWhisperer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2008
Position: MD-88 F/O
Posts: 1,004
Default

Is that a Kool-Aid bomber in ATL?
DogWhisperer is offline  
Old 06-22-2012, 06:33 AM
  #103759  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Waves's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2010
Position: SLC 767ER Captain
Posts: 602
Default

Originally Posted by forgot to bid View Post
So if we say NO to this 6 months early TA, Delta will go to the nuclear option?

So does even the threat of this happening prove constructive engagement was a farce? Because if you're not allowed to say no to a TA on principled grounds, why do we even get to vote? As long as the company and the union agree on it you have to accept it.

That's not constructive engagement, it's constructive infringement.
That’s a bit of a stretch. “Not allowed to say no? As long as the company and the union agree on it you have to accept it?” I’m not sure why you would say things like that. Every single pilot can vote no if he or she desires to do so. To say otherwise is plainly incorrect. As far as I can tell, the only immediate and lasting change to a turned down TA would be the cancelling of the 88 717’s and keeping more DCI aircraft. Other than that it sounds like everything else would be back on the table for revision. If you consider this a nuclear option, then I guess if we get a majority of no votes that would be considered a nuclear option as well. (Idiotic Pelosi Quote: Remember, we have to pass this thing so we can see what’s in it.) LOL
Waves is offline  
Old 06-22-2012, 06:45 AM
  #103760  
Da Hudge
 
80ktsClamp's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Poodle Whisperer
Posts: 17,473
Default

Originally Posted by Waves View Post
That’s a bit of a stretch. “Not allowed to say no? As long as the company and the union agree on it you have to accept it?” I’m not sure why you would say things like that. Every single pilot can vote no if he or she desires to do so. To say otherwise is plainly incorrect. As far as I can tell, the only immediate and lasting change to a turned down TA would be the cancelling of the 88 717’s and keeping more DCI aircraft. Other than that it sounds like everything else would be back on the table for revision. If you consider this a nuclear option, then I guess if we get a majority of no votes that would be considered a nuclear option as well. (Idiotic Pelosi Quote: Remember, we have to pass this thing so we can see what’s in it.) LOL
The 717s are coming no matter what... that is quite obvious.

I'd rather not pass this thing to see what's in it regarding the implementation of scope ratios and lord knows what other loopholes...
80ktsClamp is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22594
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices