Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-22-2012 | 08:58 AM
  #108231  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
From: B744 F/O
Default

Some thought that DALPA should have attempted to recapture 70/76 seat flying and anything less was a loss that took away from additional mainline jobs.



So, the pilots who obtained their jobs when Mainline gave up scope, now think we should recapture it so they can have a better job. Would they be happy if they lost their job because of scope recapture. How long would you accept being out of work in order for Mainline to retake your job?

DALPA negotiates for Delta Pilots, not UAL, AA, US, Gojets, PCL, Comair, or anyone else. If you don't like our contract, get hired at Delta and elected to a union position and change it.

Back to lurking.

Tr


UnusualAttitude, I was not shooting at you and didn't mean to give that impression.
Old 08-22-2012 | 09:03 AM
  #108232  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 864
Likes: 50
From: B767
Default

Originally Posted by trlaketige
Some thought that DALPA should have attempted to recapture 70/76 seat flying and anything less was a loss that took away from additional mainline jobs.



So, the pilots who obtained their jobs when Mainline gave up scope, now think we should recapture it so they can have a better job. Would they be happy if they lost their job because of scope recapture. How long would you accept being out of work in order for Mainline to retake your job?

DALPA negotiates for Delta Pilots, not UAL, AA, US, Gojets, PCL, Comair, or anyone else. If you don't like our contract, get hired at Delta and elected to a union position and change it.

Back to lurking.

Tr


UnusualAttitude, I was not shooting at you and didn't mean to give that impression.
Didn't take it that way. I believe that you and I are in agreement!
Old 08-22-2012 | 09:07 AM
  #108233  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,539
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by UnusualAttitude
Is "entitlements" in reference to the attitude of certain flow-through pilots or just flow-through pilots in general?
Everyone is an individual...
Old 08-22-2012 | 09:16 AM
  #108234  
Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,088
Likes: 0
From: B757/767
Default

Originally Posted by JungleBus
I really wonder about an airline where 2/3 of the pilot group deluded themselves into thinking the result of that TA could be anything but extended stagnation. The rocking chair lives.
I really wonder if you're gullible enough to think the recently ratified TA has anything to do with the current stagnation.
Old 08-22-2012 | 09:38 AM
  #108235  
acl65pilot's Avatar
Happy to be here
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 18,563
Likes: 0
From: A-320A
Default

Originally Posted by johnso29
I really wonder if you're gullible enough to think the recently ratified TA has anything to do with the current stagnation.
It has little to do with it but the TA will result in fewer pilots needed per the block plan when we do increase block hrs.

Right now the work rule language does not help us and we really cannot see its result in staffing, because the economy overshadows everything. When the economy improves in some distant date, we will be more efficient as a whole because each pilot will be flying slightly more time than they did prior to the agreement. As long as DAL holds the carrying costs on the WB jets and the down bidding occurs on the 767 and below there will be little sympathy for anyone. Given when hiring will occur the pilots hired in 2001 and later will be the ones that may see the displacements to staff the initial 739's and 717's. After that, retirements will kick in and new hires will be needed as the 717's and retirements drive hiring.

We bought it and it's our PWA. Time to look at what you want going forward and what changes, if any need to be made to get it. What we have is what we have until we can improve it.
Old 08-22-2012 | 09:47 AM
  #108236  
Purple Drank's Avatar
Straight QOL, homie
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 4,202
Likes: 1
From: Record-Shattering Profit Facilitator
Default

Originally Posted by johnso29
I really wonder if you're gullible enough to think the recently ratified TA has anything to do with the current stagnation.
Perhaps not the current stagnation.

The question is, are you gullible enough to think that this contract doesn't significantly slow down our careers (vs. the previous version)?
Old 08-22-2012 | 09:48 AM
  #108237  
Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,088
Likes: 0
From: B757/767
Default

Originally Posted by acl65pilot
It has little to do with it but the TA will result in fewer pilots needed per the block plan when we do increase block hrs.

Right now the work rule language does not help us and we really cannot see its result in staffing, because the economy overshadows everything. When the economy improves in some distant date, we will be more efficient as a whole because each pilot will be flying slightly more time than they did prior to the agreement. As long as DAL holds the carrying costs on the WB jets and the down bidding occurs on the 767 and below there will be little sympathy for anyone. Given when hiring will occur the pilots hired in 2001 and later will be the ones that may see the displacements to staff the initial 739's and 717's. After that, retirements will kick in and new hires will be needed as the 717's and retirements drive hiring.

We bought it and it's our PWA. Time to look at what you want going forward and what changes, if any need to be made to get it. What we have is what we have until we can improve it.
While I don't disagree with you, we will still be less efficient then many other Legacy groups. Yes?
Old 08-22-2012 | 09:52 AM
  #108238  
Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,088
Likes: 0
From: B757/767
Default

Originally Posted by Purple Drank
Perhaps not the current stagnation.

The question is, are you gullible enough to think that this contract doesn't significantly slow down our careers (vs. the previous version)?
Are you gullible enough to think it does? CAL reserves can be flown to 100 hours every single month. UAL is 90+ every single month. While the new contract makes our pilot group slightly more efficient, it's not to the dramatic degree that many make it out to be.
Old 08-22-2012 | 09:58 AM
  #108239  
hoserpilot's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,026
Likes: 0
From: maddoggy dog
Default

Originally Posted by johnso29
While I don't disagree with you, we will still be less efficient then many other Legacy groups. Yes?
If we work for free and outsource everything then we'd be the most efficient!!
Old 08-22-2012 | 10:02 AM
  #108240  
80ktsClamp's Avatar
Da Hudge
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,473
Likes: 0
From: Poodle Whisperer
Default

Originally Posted by johnso29
While I don't disagree with you, we will still be less efficient then many other Legacy groups. Yes?
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22617
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices