Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Delta (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/)
-   -   Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/36912-any-latest-greatest-about-delta.html)

forgot to bid 04-23-2013 12:28 PM


Originally Posted by Bucking Bar (Post 1396659)
Note for customers concerned about sequestration from today's Q&A ... avoid small RJ's which will be the first flights cancelled as sequestration delays effect hubs. Business re-booked on mainline. Mainline completion factor... 100%

I was wondering if that would play out in our favor. We can't handle more blips. Fine, but we have people that need to travel so as long as a blip is a blip, we'll use something bigger for that one blip.


Originally Posted by gloopy (Post 1396639)
Exactly. This isn't about staffing either way. Buckets are a good idea because guys, junior or senior on RSV, would get hosed because of 1 RAW point. Sometimes the guy who wanted the trip wouldn't get it while the guy who really didn't want it would (usually turning a RSV group into 2 extra days for being double non commutable, etc) so to avoid an overly rigid system that mercilessly dished out assignments blindly by a single RAW point we went to buckets of 80?

http://www.mathworks.com/help/ident/...espendulum.png

We don't have to scrap the whole thing. Maybe we can just back it off a knot or two.

I like Alfa's idea, carry over RAW score. This way the bottom pilots aren't completely hosed month after month in the effort to reward senior pilots in category with a month off.

Say if you get to bucket 3 or 4, you get 1/2 your points applied at the beginning of the next month.

And I think the RAW score bucket size should be a mathematical equation and not a blanket year round same size thing. A little seniority, fine, 100%, no.

As I was talking to one of the most senior DC9Bs on RES, even though he benefits from it NOW he won't benefit from it if he tries to move up in planes.

Put it this way, say 20% of RES will have it rough no matter what the system is, leaving 80% for a shot at some QOL. Of that 80%, would you rather have a) all of them having a "good" QOL or b) have 10% having an excellent QOL and the rest downgraded to fair or poor to make that happen?

I'm for A because I would rather talk about moving up to the 73N then moving down to the 717. I'd rather talk later about going to the ER then staying on the 717 until I'm 50% or better on the 88. That's just me.

fisherpilot 04-23-2013 12:48 PM

Could someone shed some light on the flow through process at Delta? Im curious about the numbers of flowthroughs and dci that would show up when the hiring starts due to the new contract. I knew there was some limits in there, just dont remember what they were

Thanks in advance

Boomer 04-23-2013 12:55 PM


Originally Posted by Thrust Normal (Post 1396573)
Breaking news from the earnings call - Pinnacle is the most efficient/well run commuter airlines in the industry now.

I guess everyone moved up a notch when Delta shut the doors on Comair.

Mesabah 04-23-2013 01:01 PM


Originally Posted by fisherpilot (Post 1396839)
Could someone shed some light on the flow through process at Delta? Im curious about the numbers of flowthroughs and dci that would show up when the hiring starts due to the new contract. I knew there was some limits in there, just dont remember what they were

Thanks in advance

Delta has the option to have all their new hires be dci flows/ssp, or a very small percentage of their new hires being flows/ssp. It all depends on what management wants. My guess would be DAL classes will be 50% DCI, 50% military, 1% boomer.

fisherpilot 04-23-2013 01:04 PM


Originally Posted by Mesabah (Post 1396853)
Delta has the option to have all their new hires be dci flows/ssp, or a very small percentage of their new hires being flows/ssp. It all depends on what management wants.


Ok. Thx. I thought there were limits in there

Mesabah 04-23-2013 01:05 PM


Originally Posted by fisherpilot (Post 1396857)
Ok. Thx. I thought there were limits in there

There are limits, 20-30 a month each from 9E/Compass.

TANSTAAFL 04-23-2013 01:17 PM


Originally Posted by Free Mason (Post 1396626)
Remember that back then, there were:

SC windows twice a day four hours long

Reserve X days were hard lines with off days in which pilots bid for. Now we have PBS assigning off days exclusively on seniority and most junior pilots are getting unstacked (seniority on reserve) but you would now add in a second layer of seniority on reserve.

Back then tight staffing was round 22% reserves. Now it will be closer to 10%.

Going straight seniority sounds good in principle, but remember that there were levelers back then too; no PBS awards for reserve lines, maxes etc.

It does not mean more staffing, because now we have a PBS manning formula. It means that junior pilots will fly to 99 hrs or close in the summer, fly all winter and generally not have a break. We have a reserve staffing formula too.

We have no cap or bow wave either.


Make sure before you think that this will not pit junior v senior because just like pay, there are many things that are not back to the way they were pre CH11. Changing one like we see with buckets does not mean that it will be better.

Ideas are good and I bet the MEC will debate this issue at length next week.

Wasn't the current system the result of recent SOT recommendations to insert seniority back into the reserve system and was highly applauded at the time? I agree there needs to be some tweaking of the buckets. Your points about other aspects of the pre- BK reserve system are very germane, as was someone else's about being senior doesn't mean you don't have to fly. Also more globally PWA improvements have to benefit the entire pilot group. Seniority matters, it doesn't mean you get to decrease the QOL of others junior to you so you can improve yours. Fail.

sinca3 04-23-2013 01:42 PM


Originally Posted by Mem9guy (Post 1396320)
I also think that on the 7ER resolution that if a 767 pilot chose to displace to an international category then they knew what they were getting in to. If you are not willing to fly international, bid another airplane.

I understand the resolution process, and I have emailed my reps with my thoughts on these. I was wanting to get some feedback on here just to see what others thought of them.

When I read that I thought the exact thing. They new why they were getting into when they chose to displace/move into that position. Does it suck that pure domestic 76/75 flying is gone, sure!!! It doesn't change the fact they had other options and instead of choosing those they're trying to make bigger changes that affect more people and in my opinion negatively.

nwaf16dude 04-23-2013 02:24 PM


Originally Posted by Columbia (Post 1396611)
Emirates contemplating new SEA-CPH service.

Dubai Eye - Sir Maurice Flanagan 16.04.2013

SEA-CPH? Does that sound like a money maker to anyone? I have a hard time seeing that route filling up a 777/787, but what do I know? I expect we will see many more head-scratcher city pairs as EK's giant WB orders keep rolling in. They have to fly them somewhere. I see lots of money losing seats being dumped into questionable markets in our future. But, at least they have hot flight attendants.

gloopy 04-23-2013 02:25 PM


Originally Posted by Mesabah (Post 1396858)
There are limits, 20-30 a month each from 9E/Compass.

True, but CPZ taps out at 1/4 of their (small) list per year too. So if DL hires classes every or almost every month and 500-600 total (what we've been hearing) they could run classes with half "off the street" the first 4-5 months of the year and 100% off the street the last 7 months. One year of agressive hiring and the 9E flows are tapped out, though there would still be the guaranteed interviews, etc of course.

IOW plenty of room for off the street hires looks very, very likely. Which is, if I had to guess, exactly where the company wants to be.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:24 AM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands