![]() |
|
You gotta laugh. ATL-CLT is a 30-35 minute flight. Blocks at 1:20-1:25 now. And you still might not be on time on a clear day.
Why? Because CLT doesn't like airplanes pointed at them or away from them, they just don't like airplanes. |
Just read an email from the A320 fleet to instructors. According to the letter Boeing and AB were both in town pitching deals. The company was leaning hard towards AB but very recently Boeing has sweetened its deal.
Could be why no announcement yet. I apologize for taking everyone away from the DPA vs DALPA debate. |
Originally Posted by forgot to bid
(Post 1475135)
Why? Because CLT doesn't like airplanes pointed at them or away from them, they just don't like airplanes.
Atlanta's the best, CLT is the worst, Detroit just seems to like to keep the airplanes airborne as long as they can. |
Originally Posted by chuck416
(Post 1475054)
Am I the only one who sees the irony of the ALPA moniker written on much of the union's literature. I'm talking about the Unity label that we see on so much of the association's communication we receive. And yet, the last contract passed with what, a 62% approval? Unity--or lack there of--is the fundamental problem with our association. Back in the day, our contracts passed with 'yes' votes in the 90th percentile. MEMRAT ought to be an overwhelming YES, every time!
Rant over. |
Originally Posted by Dorfman
(Post 1475139)
Just read an email from the A320 fleet to instructors. According to the letter Boeing and AB were both in town pitching deals. The company was leaning hard towards AB but very recently Boeing has sweetened its deal.
Could be why no announcement yet. I apologize for taking everyone away from the DPA vs DALPA debate. |
Originally Posted by Denny Crane
(Post 1475019)
Not that it matters but I don't think it was LOA 46, more like 51 I believe. If I remember correctly when that vote came up, Delta was already in the recall process and was planning on meeting or beating the recall schedule so to many it seemed like a moot point and if they could get something for it, why not. As it turned out, didn't Delta meet or beat that recall schedule anyway? (Or come pretty close to it?)
Maybe the first sign of proactive engagement?;):) I'm confident it was LOA 46, because I was back for 51, and everything had unfolded before my return. I (and many others) were then recalled on Delta's own schedule, when they wanted me. It was probably not a lot later than the recall schedule called for some of us, maybe a lot later for others. I really never retroactively placed the arbitrator's schedule against the actual recall chronology. The point is that all of it was done strictly on Delta's schedule, except for the "FM II" group. I don't lose sleep over this stuff: I was just trying to add some perspective to the conversation. |
Originally Posted by alfaromeo
(Post 1475015)
They may have been at NetJets, or ASA, or working for their father's insurance company. It is cavalier to make them have to decide to quit their job when you have no clue as to whether or not they will have solid employment for more than six months.
One guy blew his brains out. Many others found out their spouses weren't into furloughed Delta pilots. Not every father runs an insurance company, and an insurance company is no cockpit. I was very aggressive at finding a replacement job, and very "lucky". I fed my family, and had that satisfaction. I also paid off my career debt, so that was good. Other than that, I hated every day at work, feeling like a fish out of the water. My company fired 20% every year, and hired 20% every year. I learned a little about human behavior those Friday mornings, when I saw people leaving their cubicles with a little box of personal effects, and a portion of their dignity: you feel bad for them until noon. By the time you drive home, you're just overcome with relief it wasn't you. That's how these things work, and it's true in our industry as well: we do a little for the furloughees, we talk about them, but mostly we're just glad we're not in their shoes. Which makes it difficult to lecture them on the circumstances under which they might have liked to return to work. Many guys would have given their left nut for a 6-months stint, with a 75% chance of re-furlough. You're a smart person, and a very informed poster. I have a lot of respect for much of your work. You can validate that respect by acknowledging you're wrong, when you're wrong. You were probably correct about the numbers of green slips, but you took a wrong turn in this last post. |
Originally Posted by johnso29
(Post 1475158)
I too heard last week that Boeing had taken the lead for the RFP award.
Any word on the next AE and fact or fiction about delay's in 717 deliveries? Yeah, I heard October, but with just 1, and will the monthly deleivery schedule hold up? |
Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
(Post 1474980)
Sorry, but I must disagree. The change that made "network or national unity a hypothetical" was done in 1998 and affirmed at the 2000 BOD meeting.
Lawson, the RJDC, and furloughs were the unwitting fall out; reactions to, and effects of, a policy of disunity. All of those unfortunate things came after ALPA's policy change on alter-ego and were a result of the conflict created by that policy change. Unity is the high ground. Whoever supports unity will eventually win. Getting back to the topic of the DPA fight, this is like Gettysburg. The DPA may have even fought a hell of a battle up to now, but like the Confederate General, they don't have a map of this foreign soil they are about to fight on. ALPA may have screwed up and let the DPA within a couple days march to Herndon, but ALPA somewhere has maps. Those maps show where the high ground is ... unity. Unity is there for the taking right now. The DPA has failed to sieze upon it. I honestly can't discuss the BOD actions intelligently: I wasn't even aware of them at the time. I agree on the DPA. The bid for power has not succeeded; they just can't seem to come to terms with it in a constructive way. We do need one voice speaking for the Delta pilots from this point, with no impairment. |
Originally Posted by Sink r8
(Post 1475163)
Now you're venturing onto areas that are best left to others. It's not a good idea to describe appropriate choices for people placed in a situation you don't fully grasp.
One guy blew his brains out. Many others found out their spouses weren't into furloughed Delta pilots. Not every father runs an insurance company, and an insurance company is no cockpit. I was very aggressive at finding a replacement job, and very "lucky". I fed my family, and had that satisfaction. I also paid off my career debt, so that was good. Other than that, I hated every day at work, feeling like a fish out of the water. My company fired 20% every year, and hired 20% every year. I learned a little about human behavior those Friday mornings, when I saw people leaving their cubicles with a little box of personal effects, and a portion of their dignity: you feel bad for them until noon. By the time you drive home, you're just overcome with relief it wasn't you. That's how these things work, and it's true in our industry as well: we do a little for the furloughees, we talk about them, but mostly we're just glad we're not in their shoes. Which makes it difficult to lecture them on the circumstances under which they might have liked to return to work. Many guys would have given their left nut for a 6-months stint, with a 75% chance of re-furlough. You're a smart person, and a very informed poster. I have a lot of respect for much of your work. You can validate that respect by acknowledging you're wrong, when you're wrong. You were probably correct about the numbers of green slips, but you took a wrong turn in this last post. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:42 PM. |
|
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands