![]() |
|
Originally Posted by flyallnite
(Post 1491244)
Right. Like Microsoft is going to pull the account because we won't be forced to buy 10,000 of their useless paperweights. What other airline would?
Sorry. I wasn't implying that the purchase was made to maintain an account. I meant Delta would gain Microsoft corporate accounts in return. A handshake deal if you will. It's simply my opinion. I don't know if Microsoft already flies with Delta. If they do, then disregard. |
Originally Posted by johnso29
(Post 1491265)
Sorry. I wasn't implying that the purchase was made to maintain an account. I meant Delta would gain Microsoft corporate accounts in return. A handshake deal if you will. It's simply my opinion. I don't know if Microsoft already flies with Delta. If they do, then disregard.
Here's PCWorld's take on the tablet we're getting: Microsoft's Surface 2 tablet follows faithfully in the footsteps of failure | PCWorld A few more opinions: |
Supposedly Microsoft is already our largest corporate account. I know we have separate Microsoft check-in lines in Seattle.
|
Originally Posted by flyallnite
(Post 1491270)
Didn't mean to flame you, sorry. This all just reeks of the old 4th floor style mismanagement. We're the largest, most profitable airline in the world. We ought to have the best equipment available to us. I've researched this device and it screams 'totally useless'. The RT platform is a massive, epic failure. The boss of the company just quit. If this were a true Windows (ala Surface pro 2) tablet I'd be more than happy. As it is, we've just invested in obsolescent technology. If we really needed to do this to get Microsoft to like us more, then we should just donate them to schools in Bolivia and buy something that works.
Here's PCWorld's take on the tablet we're getting: Microsoft's Surface 2 tablet follows faithfully in the footsteps of failure | PCWorld A few more opinions:
Originally Posted by nwaf16dude
(Post 1491272)
Supposedly Microsoft is already our largest corporate account. I know we have separate Microsoft check-in lines in Seattle.
|
You Surface 2 haters are full of hops.
It is really the best device out there for what Delta wants to do. In fact Surface 2, if people will keep an open mind, will be a terrific piece of enterprise level kit for the reasons covered here: Windows RT: Fortified against malware | Security - InfoWorld Delta could care less if you don't have a dedicated Facebook App ... boo flipping hoo ... you'll have to run your Skype, Facebook, type stuff on Internet Explorer 10. But even so IE10 is tons better than any browser that runs on the iPad. For us the Surface 2 is cool because it will be a powerhouse of a Tablet, something like 6 times as fast an iPad for some tasks. It cuts through 1080p video like butter. We can set up our own User Accounts and have reasonable independence from the Administrator, while using full Office productivity tools, real HDMI, USB3, the latest WiFi protocols and being able to print from it easily. Windows accessory keyboards are the best in this marketplace and with the aux battery / keyboard a lot of us could probably leave the charger at home and be fine. That combo should have something like a 15 hour + life (and perhaps well over 20 hours) the thing already has 15 days of standby power without the aux battery accessory. From a system administrator viewpoint, this thing is perfect. I don't know if it will replace my personal EFB, but we've already got one coming for the wifey (since I'm the system admin at my house and hate dorking with her computers). In semi related news, my hacked tablet is running a distro called "Brazillian Wax" ... guess the nerd figured that was as smooth as it could be made :) That's why Delta probably should remain well clear of anything like and Apple or full Win 8.1 product ... some nerd like me would try to hack it & just break the thing. Delta is ahead of the curve on this. |
Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
(Post 1491302)
We can set up our own User Accounts and have reasonable independence from the Administrator.
What's the porn situation? Is it trackable? :D :eek: |
Originally Posted by flyallnite
(Post 1491270)
Didn't mean to flame you, sorry. This all just reeks of the old 4th floor style mismanagement. We're the largest, most profitable airline in the world. We ought to have the best equipment available to us. I've researched this device and it screams 'totally useless'. The RT platform is a massive, epic failure. The boss of the company just quit. If this were a true Windows (ala Surface pro 2) tablet I'd be more than happy. As it is, we've just invested in obsolescent technology. If we really needed to do this to get Microsoft to like us more, then we should just donate them to schools in Bolivia and buy something that works.
Here's PCWorld's take on the tablet we're getting: Microsoft's Surface 2 tablet follows faithfully in the footsteps of failure | PCWorld A few more opinions: |
Originally Posted by DeadHead
(Post 1491324)
Good stuff, but here's the important question....will we be able to pick the color for our covers?
http://img825.imageshack.us/img825/8853/0header.jpg I'm sure one of those personalized tablet cases places could do that for you. |
10 hour battery life?
So is it going to be plugged in somewhere for our 15-17+ hour legs? As long as it will quickly, easily and adequately display all the Jepp pages and charts we need, I don't really care about how it does Facebook, video games or Angry Birds. Words with Friends would be nice, I'm sick of that Alec Baldwin kicking my arse with that! |
Originally Posted by alfaromeo
(Post 1491115)
No that is not my counter argument. Your analysis would be accurate if Delta flew one day per month. Here is my counter argument.
On a micro level you can look at it like this. Let's say Delta has to cover 20 rotations in a month. At first they are 8 hour legs and 16 roundtrip. If the ALV is 80, each pilot could fly 5 round trips a month, so you would need 4 pilots to cover each position. If you increase the block time by 25% to 10 hours each way, then each pilot could only cover 4 round trips and you would need 5 pilots to cover each positions. Not surprisingly a 25% increase in block hours equates to a 25% increase in pilots required. There are constraints via the staffing formula and PWA and I said I have X amount of hours figure out how to do it with Y number of pilots that fit those constraints then you could figure it out. If I say X plus 47% more, but I'm going to give you the same number of pilots, figure it out, you can figure it out. There's a range that they have to work with. If the number is 80 or 75 only that's one thing, but having a 75-80 range and 60 hours max on reserves on average, you can make it to where block hours can go up and you can use the same number of pilots. You can have a BH ratio, I don't care, but I want a fleet count. (see below)
Originally Posted by alfaromeo
(Post 1491115)
If I give you X BHs per month and say the ALV must be between 75-80 and the RES can't exceed 60, figure out how many pilots
How many aircraft does it take to fly the above examples. I don't care if it's 10 aircraft or 50. That is management's job to figure out. Pilots fly block hours. Our ALV is in hours, our TLV is in hours, our pickup limit is in hours. Not once do you see the aircraft count in any of those formulae.
Originally Posted by alfaromeo
(Post 1491115)
On a macro level, if you churn through all the items in the Manning formula, you would come up with an average block hours/pilot/month. Let's say it's 60, that number is close but let's just use 60. From you example if you had 150 aircraft at 8.1 hours per leg you would generate 150 x 16.2 x 30 hours per month or 72,900 hours. At 60 hours per pilot that would be 1215 pilots per position. If you upped the block hours to 11.9 per leg you have 150 x 23.8 x 30 = 107,100 hours. At 60 hours per, you would have 1785 pilots. Not shockingly, a 47% increase in block hours equates to a 47% increase in pilots required.
Originally Posted by alfaromeo
(Post 1491115)
You are confusing how many pilots it takes to fill up a month's schedule to how many are flying on one day. In your example, there would be an identical number of pilots flying on each day. However, in the higher block hour example, pilots would run out of hours in fewer days. Hence, a 777 pilot might get 80 hours in 9 days and a 717 pilot might take 14 but they both fly 80 hours.
But give me an ALV (TLV would be the same) and reserve constraint and I can get the same number of pilots to fly 47% more block hours in the said example. You said block hours are all that matters, I'm out to prove that's not true... using math. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:51 PM. |
|
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands