Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Delta (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/)
-   -   Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/36912-any-latest-greatest-about-delta.html)

ShyGuy 02-14-2014 04:29 PM


Originally Posted by Purple Drank (Post 1581765)
All because a guy couldn't do a stall recovery.

It's a little more complicated than just that. The duty/rest rules and limits were long overdue for change.

TANSTAAFL 02-14-2014 04:35 PM


Originally Posted by ShyGuy (Post 1581777)
It's a little more complicated than just that. The duty/rest rules and limits were long overdue for change.

Yeah. His F/O raised the flaps to increase lift in the stall. :mad:

Bucking Bar 02-14-2014 05:47 PM



Somebody must have been following my family around this week.

forgot to bid 02-14-2014 06:03 PM


Originally Posted by TANSTAAFL (Post 1581781)
Yeah. His F/O raised the flaps to increase lift in the stall. :mad:

Bad FAA approved training.

Timbo 02-14-2014 06:11 PM


Originally Posted by forgot to bid (Post 1581847)
Bad FAA approved training.

Flying a bad FAA approved, Ice Machine...into Icing conditions. :eek:

forgot to bid 02-14-2014 06:17 PM


Originally Posted by Timbo (Post 1581855)
Flying a bad FAA approved, Ice Machine...into Icing conditions. :eek:

Boots suck.

sailingfun 02-14-2014 06:19 PM


Originally Posted by Timbo (Post 1581855)
Flying a bad FAA approved, Ice Machine...into Icing conditions. :eek:

Icing had nothing to do with the accident. They simply stalled the aircraft.


The airplane performance study and simulations showed that the airplane experienced minimal performance degradation because of ice accretion.184 Specifically, the AOA at the time of the wing stall was about 1° above the expected AOA for a clean wing (no ice accretion) stall warning. Thus, the airplane could have been operated in normal flight, at the non-icing Vref, and with a substantial margin remaining above the actual point of stall. As a result, the NTSB concludes that the minimal aircraft performance degradation resulting from ice accumulation did not affect the flight crew’s ability to fly and control the airplane. The flight crew’s actions during the accident sequence are further discussed in sections 2.2.2 through 2.2.4.


They were at 2300 feet on autopilot approaching the marker in level flight. The CA commanded gear down and flaps to 15. Props were set to fine pitch and power to idle. It was left there until the aircraft stalled. The PFD gave them 18 seconds of warning in red they were slowing below the commanded AS prior to stick shaker.

80ktsClamp 02-14-2014 06:26 PM

Pretty sure we just had an earthquake in Atlanta. Anyone else feel that?

Elliot 02-14-2014 06:39 PM



Originally Posted by DeadHead (Post 1581753)
Thought it was just me. Seems as though schedules have really tanked since 117 kicked in.

All because a guy couldn't do a stall recovery.
A good friend of mine lost his sister in that Colgan flight. She was 32-weeks pregnant with her first child.

Sometimes I dismiss your ignorant comments as being misplaced childhood abuse & subsequent confused anger, but this comment above, allows you to take home the APC Gold Medal of Stupid comments. Congrats Pee-drink, you have medaled, & subsequently been awarded the Tool of the Year award.

There were many more details involved in that fatal night's flight than the Captain's "inability" to perform a stall recovery.

sailingfun 02-14-2014 06:52 PM


Originally Posted by Purple Drank (Post 1581722)
This is by far the worst trip selection and bid award I've ever had at Delta.

QOL is getting worse.


The company put out a fairly extensive summary of the changes 117 caused in rotation construction. Overall however the average daily value went up not down with 117. There was surprisingly little change system wide in rotation construction.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:41 PM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands