Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Delta (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/)
-   -   Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/36912-any-latest-greatest-about-delta.html)

gzsg 06-27-2014 10:49 AM


Originally Posted by Denny Crane (Post 1672745)
All I can say is............................I'm not holding my breath.

Their past track record in pre-merger/bankruptcy negotiations does not lead one to have a lot of confidence that they will negotiate a new contract before we do. I sure hope they do.

Denny

American looks to be making more than Delta in 2014. Around $4.7 to $5 billion. While ALPA loves to look down at APA, they actually have a great union and a great pilot group.

I think they will do very well with much greater leverage.

All Parker has to do is look at UAL and see his future if he ****es off the pilots.

Like you I hope they hit it out of the park..

The pendulum as swung and it is our turn.

forgot to bid 06-27-2014 11:33 AM


Originally Posted by tsquare (Post 1673000)
Boeing cannot be this incompetent. SO they destroyed the tooling for arguably one of the best aircraft they have developed. OK. There's zero corporate knowledge or designers capable of recreating it? Or is all they are currently able to do is add a plug into existing airframes?


Boeing’s design would meld features from the single-aisle 737 Max, which seats as many as 192 people, and the twin-aisle 787-8, with a capacity for 242 travelers, McNerney said. The planemaker used a similar approach when it developed the 757 jointly with the larger 767 in the 1980s.

So you take something that sucks and merge it with something that sucks?


I guess maybe a 787-200? A 767-200 replacement?

EdGrimley 06-27-2014 11:37 AM


Originally Posted by tsquare (Post 1673000)
Boeing cannot be this incompetent. SO they destroyed the tooling for arguably one of the best aircraft they have developed. OK. There's zero corporate knowledge or designers capable of recreating it? Or is all they are currently able to do is add a plug into existing airframes?

I see your point. I agree they shut it down too soon. That said, it is a breath of fresh air literally and figuratively to hear Boeing is mulling a new clean sheet domestic NB. I thought we were doomed to see only their 737 offering with "SWA inspired cockpit" for the rest of our lives.

tsquare 06-27-2014 12:01 PM


Originally Posted by sailingfun (Post 1673037)
The design is to old and can't be built at any kind of competitive cost. It's toast regardless of the tooling situation.

Yeah, having that 2L door available to speed up the emplaning/deplaning process for 180+ passengers really sucks.:rolleyes:

I'll betcha that the difference between turn times on the 73-9 and the 757 is 15 minutes at least.

tsquare 06-27-2014 12:02 PM


Originally Posted by gzsg (Post 1673043)

The pendulum as swung and it is our turn.

Not yet it isn't

Elliot 06-27-2014 12:14 PM



Originally Posted by gzsg (Post 1673043)

The pendulum has swung and it is our turn.

Not yet it isn't
Thanks to Southwestern Airlines for not raising the bar! :rolleyes:

flyallnite 06-27-2014 12:23 PM

A 757 replacement? Not going to happen. Why? Both Boeing and Airbus have a comfortably thick order book for aircraft that can do 98 percent of the routes, spare parts galore, and trained pilots, mechanics, simulators and inventories. Developing an entirely new aircraft is incredibly expensive. Assuming they are talking about essentially a narrowbody 787 with GTF engines, the program would never break even, because the 737 and A320 have been improved well beyond what they were originally conceived to be.

Which is of course, sad. Because the 757 does what it does very, very well. And it does that because it incorporated lessons learned, and was engineered to a very high standard by people who saw what happened to B17's, and B52's when things went badly. Extra metal, extra power, extra wheels, extra brakes, extra system redundancy all add up to an aircraft which has no equal.

But the calculus used by airlines today are purely cold numbers. Being able to stop on a slippery runway, climb over weather, board pax in separate classes, takeoff and land on high, hot and short runways, and provide a comfortable and safe environment for the crew is not part of that calculus. You know who still cares about that stuff? People who fly corporate or private. Look at the G650 or the Citation X. Mach .93 at 45,000 feet, synthetic vision, XM weather, lightning detection, heads up display, satcom, datalink. Nothing but state of the art. The best we can hope for is a third manufacturer who decides to create the next generation of commercial airliner. They'd have to be crazy though. Or maybe heavily state supported.

EdGrimley 06-27-2014 12:33 PM


Originally Posted by flyallnite (Post 1673126)
A 757 replacement? Not going to happen. Why? Both Boeing and Airbus have a comfortably thick order book for aircraft that can do 98 percent of the routes, spare parts galore, and trained pilots, mechanics, simulators and inventories. Developing an entirely new aircraft is incredibly expensive. Assuming they are talking about essentially a narrowbody 787 with GTF engines, the program would never break even, because the 737 and A320 have been improved well beyond what they were originally conceived to be.

Which is of course, sad. Because the 757 does what it does very, very well. And it does that because it incorporated lessons learned, and was engineered to a very high standard by people who saw what happened to B17's, and B52's when things went badly. Extra metal, extra power, extra wheels, extra brakes, extra system redundancy all add up to an aircraft which has no equal.

But the calculus used by airlines today are purely cold numbers. Being able to stop on a slippery runway, climb over weather, board pax in separate classes, takeoff and land on high, hot and short runways, and provide a comfortable and safe environment for the crew is not part of that calculus. You know who still cares about that stuff? People who fly corporate or private. Look at the G650 or the Citation X. Mach .93 at 45,000 feet, synthetic vision, XM weather, lightning detection, heads up display, satcom, datalink. Nothing but state of the art. The best we can hope for is a third manufacturer who decides to create the next generation of commercial airliner. They'd have to be crazy though. Or maybe heavily state supported.

All good points.

flyallnite 06-27-2014 12:56 PM

There is a good "behind the business" piece on the DLnet about aircraft acquisitions at Delta. It's the reason we're making so much money, but it's also pretty enlightening as to the future of our fleet. The good news is we're going to keep making money, because their system is a solid one. The bad news is that if you like flying big airplanes, you should go to United. RA stated in the Wings Club presentation that the 747 replacement would ideally have 100 fewer seats. So that's the top end of our future fleet...

Roadkill 06-27-2014 12:56 PM

Question for FlightLine WW or EasySwap users: I used to be able to download reserve manning (still can using WW) and then it would display horizontally as a calendar color coded green and red along the top...

I can't figure out how I did it, or with which program now?? I can't find a display for reserve manning along the top for either WidgetWorks or EasySwap. I'm thinking it was in EasySwap that it was displayed, letting you see swap trips underneath that had manning to work with. But I can't find it now.

Any help would be appreciated, thx!
RK


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:51 AM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands