Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-27-2014 | 10:16 AM
  #166941  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,876
Likes: 193
Default

Originally Posted by RockyBoy
You have the numbers on just those who are RES pilots?
Those are all pilot numbers. I don't have a source for regular or reserve only. I suspect a few phone calls to the company could get them.
Old 08-27-2014 | 10:16 AM
  #166942  
forgot to bid's Avatar
veut gagner à la loterie
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 23,286
Likes: 0
From: Light Chop
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
Forced or did you yellow high during the month?
What's a high yellow? Where can one select that option?
Old 08-27-2014 | 10:21 AM
  #166943  
RockyBoy's Avatar
Doesn't Get Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,599
Likes: 2
Default

Originally Posted by scambo1
IMO, what really happened is while I was trying to roll the thunder, I got caught by capped x days and stuck with where my off days were thereby losing control of anything after that.
Nothing worse than a rolling thunder attempt gone haywire.
Old 08-27-2014 | 10:24 AM
  #166944  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,876
Likes: 193
Default

Originally Posted by Scoop
FB,

The stagnation has been very, very frustrating for most of us. Hopefully we will all start moving up - I am at 15 years and still a NB FO (by choice) and would love for this movement to continue.

Yes Sailing and Alfa often take a very positive look at things but that is OK. They have been here longer than most of us and have a lot more history to draw from.

I am just as frustrated when I see guys who have been 6 or 7 years complain how unfair the reserve system is. Reserve used to be 100% seniority weighted. Then seniority was totally removed, and now it is partially weighted - in my opinion a very good compromise system that could still use some fine tuning (SC assignments in particular).

My perspective is not unique - many 1999 and 2000 hires saw a couple of great years, followed by furlough, BK, and the slow crawl back.

I don't always agree with the guys you refer to - Sailing, Alfa, etc, but I do appreciate that they have seen everything we have seen at DAL plus one or two more up and down cycles and so they often have the best perspective on many issues.

Scoop
What is interesting is the 2007 hires are perhaps in the position to have the best careers anyone has seen at Delta. Advancement is going to be rapid for a long time. The front loading of the retirement plan via the merger stock is absolutely huge from a retirement standpoint. 150k upfront is easily worth 5 or 6% in yearly contributions over a 30 year career.
Old 08-27-2014 | 10:26 AM
  #166945  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 5,113
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Scoop
FB,

The stagnation has been very, very frustrating for most of us. Hopefully we will all start moving up - I am at 15 years and still a NB FO (by choice) and would love for this movement to continue.

Yes Sailing and Alfa often take a very positive look at things but that is OK. They have been here longer than most of us and have a lot more history to draw from.

I am just as frustrated when I see guys who have been 6 or 7 years complain how unfair the reserve system is. Reserve used to be 100% seniority weighted. Then seniority was totally removed, and now it is partially weighted - in my opinion a very good compromise system that could still use some fine tuning (SC assignments in particular).

My perspective is not unique - many 1999 and 2000 hires saw a couple of great years, followed by furlough, BK, and the slow crawl back.

I don't always agree with the guys you refer to - Sailing, Alfa, etc, but I do appreciate that they have seen everything we have seen at DAL plus one or two more up and down cycles and so they often have the best perspective on many issues.

Scoop
My Scoop speaks for me!

Clearly, the Reserve system's trip into a Marxist-Leninist bent post 9/11 was punitive to many pilots that had already pre-paid their dues under the old system, and were subsequently unable to get any credit for their seniority, the value of which plummeted to zero. Our devalued rights, which were converted into some new crap called RAW currency, which was given freely to all. Which made a new hire just as much of a prince or a peasant as anyone else, and so it was that ftb and other newhires got to think of themselves as equally entitled to flying as someone who HAD been furloughed, HAD lost the game of LOW/HIGH yellows when it was their turn, but now couldn't use their seniority at all to compete for flying anymore. We got shafted, but their perspective on this matter was based on the then-existing system of 2007.

So, to the newhires, past dues that went unrewarded went completely unnoticed.

When we finally designed and implemented something better, they 2007 guys cry bitter tears over the fact that there is LITTLE seniority bias to the Reserve system (emphasis on "little"), and they can't bear the thought of losing the artificial equality they had come to live under, never mind that it was an accident of a history they didn't share in. They sure don't mind the fact that a junior guy flies a trip they don't want, but they can't bear the idea of a senior guy sitting a little longer in a different raw bucket. It messes up their brains, this slightly unequal screw-job, even though it is entirely appropriate, and STILL fails to properly pay us back.

My thinking is that when all you're obsessed about is making sure we're all getting screwed equally, you're in the wrong game. When we design a system, as we have that is CLEARLY much better in the aggregate for Reserves we win. And when we design it with a LITTLE seniority bias, we are only doing what is right.

ftb's problem isn't that he got screwed when he was junior (he didn't), is that he has too little respect for those of us that got screwed when we were junior AND when we were more senior.
Old 08-27-2014 | 10:32 AM
  #166946  
RockyBoy's Avatar
Doesn't Get Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,599
Likes: 2
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
What is interesting is the 2007 hires are perhaps in the position to have the best careers anyone has seen at Delta. Advancement is going to be rapid for a long time. The front loading of the retirement plan via the merger stock is absolutely huge from a retirement standpoint. 150k upfront is easily worth 5 or 6% in yearly contributions over a 30 year career.
Disclaimer.....not complaining here.

Where do you come up with 150K merger stock? Are you assuming that is the value of the merger stock if we did not sell it and still hold it? I'll bet almost all of us dumped that long ago. I sold out at $15/share for about 50K.
Old 08-27-2014 | 10:36 AM
  #166947  
RockyBoy's Avatar
Doesn't Get Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,599
Likes: 2
Default

Originally Posted by Sink r8
My Scoop speaks for me!

Clearly, the Reserve system's trip into a Marxist-Leninist bent post 9/11 was punitive to many pilots that had already pre-paid their dues under the old system, and were subsequently unable to get any credit for their seniority, the value of which plummeted to zero. Our devalued rights, which were converted into some new crap called RAW currency, which was given freely to all. Which made a new hire just as much of a prince or a peasant as anyone else, and so it was that ftb and other newhires got to think of themselves as equally entitled to flying as someone who HAD been furloughed, HAD lost the game of LOW/HIGH yellows when it was their turn, but now couldn't use their seniority at all to compete for flying anymore. We got shafted, but their perspective on this matter was based on the then-existing system of 2007.

So, to the newhires, past dues that went unrewarded went completely unnoticed.

When we finally designed and implemented something better, they 2007 guys cry bitter tears over the fact that there is LITTLE seniority bias to the Reserve system (emphasis on "little"), and they can't bear the thought of losing the artificial equality they had come to live under, never mind that it was an accident of a history they didn't share in. They sure don't mind the fact that a junior guy flies a trip they don't want, but they can't bear the idea of a senior guy sitting a little longer in a different raw bucket. It messes up their brains, this slightly unequal screw-job, even though it is entirely appropriate, and STILL fails to properly pay us back.

My thinking is that when all you're obsessed about is making sure we're all getting screwed equally, you're in the wrong game. When we design a system, as we have that is CLEARLY much better in the aggregate for Reserves we win. And when we design it with a LITTLE seniority bias, we are only doing what is right.

ftb's problem isn't that he got screwed when he was junior (he didn't), is that he has too little respect for those of us that got screwed when we were junior AND when we were more senior.
I'm an 07 hire and I love the reserve system. The RAW score deal I thought was idiotic and virtually impossible to know what to expect. The new system does kind of suck when you are junior, but it's much better than the old one IMO.
Old 08-27-2014 | 10:41 AM
  #166948  
RockyBoy's Avatar
Doesn't Get Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,599
Likes: 2
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
What is interesting is the 2007 hires are perhaps in the position to have the best careers anyone has seen at Delta. Advancement is going to be rapid for a long time.
I would say the 14 hires are gonna be the winners. Those guys will upgrade faster than 07 guys got off reserve. 00-01 hires will always win the prize for the crappiest career movement. I don't really know what to say other than sorry. I respect you guys for sticking it out cuz I probably would have thrown in the towel and started a trucking company.
Old 08-27-2014 | 10:43 AM
  #166949  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 5,113
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by RockyBoy
I'm an 07 hire and I love the reserve system. The RAW score deal I thought was idiotic and virtually impossible to know what to expect. The new system does kind of suck when you are junior, but it's much better than the old one IMO.
Right. Just so we're straight, I'm not making any blanket statements about 2007 guys, or about ftb. He's a smart guy and a great APC contributor. I'm only mentioning him by name because he's very vocal on this topic. And wrong, IMO.

I would argue that almost everyone I know acknowledges your point: the current system is better than in 2007. It's debatable whether it's good enough, but it's pretty clearly better.

The only sort of complaints I see about the bucket system is that sometimes, when you're not staffed too tight, a senior guy that's in the same bucket gets to stay home for a brief reprieve.

I think we agree he deserves it.
Old 08-27-2014 | 10:51 AM
  #166950  
tsquare's Avatar
No longer cares
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 12,109
Likes: 0
From: 767er Captain
Default

Originally Posted by Free Bird
T, you should bid narrow body domestic and do a 4 day trip with 17 legs on it. 5 legs a day is great after waking up at 0330! Just for fun bid RES for a few months in a row. You obviously will not do that, but if you did, you might see things a bit differently.
That doesn't answer the question. I get it that narrobody is Delta's *****. But that still doesn't tell me how many guys are regularly being driven to 99 hours.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22617
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices