![]() |
|
AE award is out. Junior Captain nearly reached 10,000
|
Originally Posted by LivingTheDream
(Post 1743724)
Um, no... wife's father died recently... they would not let me use/move vacation, even though there were a lot of complexities due to him dieing in a different country (basically took two weeks to straighten everything out). Good luck.
Also, I was moving from days with worse coverage to days with better coverage. |
Originally Posted by LeineLodge
(Post 1743896)
From the Fall Roar...
I suppose Mike could have used a different image to make his point than a hypothetical future contract, with this one looming. This is even more true in the sense that our company and the company's survival will go hand-in-hand, so this would not represent one side getting the upper hand at the negotiating table. It's true that our airlines are facing a clear problem, the solution to which is not evident yet. It's also pretty clear that labor concessions will not be the solution, because it will only exacerbate the differences in service. Facing the ME carriers will require a highly motivated workforce, high levels of service, innovative thinking by management, and some serious joint lobbying. Their advantages are geographic (especially vs. European and Asian carriers), regulatory (backing of their government), and financial (backing of their government, our own government, and aircraft manufacturers). As such, I think Mike is right that 2019 will be yet another fight for survival by the airlines, but I don't think it will have anything to do with any contract. Qantas employees could give, and give, and give until they bleed, but it will not overcome the advantages enjoyed by the ME carriers. All in all, forward thinking on Mike's topic (maybe too forward, really), but marginal choice to use the "C2019" image. Not much to see here in terms of C2015, however. |
What we have going for us vis a vis the ME carriers is someday the Sheiks and Princes and Sultans won't be able to throw enough money at their pet tiger called ISIS/Al Qaeda/Hamas/Hezbollah. The Islamists already hate the Saudi Royals and the Emeratis won't be far behind in the line to the beheading stone.
That's why we should stay the hell out of it and let them kill each other off. |
Originally Posted by satchip
(Post 1743933)
What we have going for us vis a vis the ME carriers is someday the Sheiks and Princes and Sultans won't be able to throw enough money at their pet tiger called ISIS/Al Qaeda/Hamas/Hezbollah. The Islamists already hate the Saudi Royals and the Emeratis won't be far behind in the line to the beheading stone.
That's why we should stay the hell out of it and let them kill each other off. We HAVE to hardcore oppose cabotage in the states just in case. |
Originally Posted by Sink r8
(Post 1743926)
Thanks for posting that.
I suppose Mike could have used a different image to make his point than a hypothetical future contract, with this one looming. This is even more true in the sense that our company and the company's survival will go hand-in-hand, so this would not represent one side getting the upper hand at the negotiating table. It's true that our airlines are facing a clear problem, the solution to which is not evident yet. It's also pretty clear that labor concessions will not be the solution, because it will only exacerbate the differences in service. Facing the ME carriers will require a highly motivated workforce, high levels of service, innovative thinking by management, and some serious joint lobbying. Their advantages are geographic (especially vs. European and Asian carriers), regulatory (backing of their government), and financial (backing of their government, our own government, and aircraft manufacturers). As such, I think Mike is right that 2019 will be yet another fight for survival by the airlines, but I don't think it will have anything to do with any contract. Qantas employees could give, and give, and give until they bleed, but it will not overcome the advantages enjoyed by the ME carriers. All in all, forward thinking on Mike's topic (maybe too forward, really), but marginal choice to use the "C2019" image. Not much to see here in terms of C2015, however. For those of us with a few decades left this is the biggest threat. It transcends industry cycles and contracts. There is a fundamental change in the global environment and I think Mike's point was to try to shake us up a little bit and see the threat for what it is. Have I made a PAC recruiting post lately?? In DC money talks, and the ME carriers haven't been shy about tossing it around. IMO, our govt affairs guys are the best hope we have of keeping our politicians from selling us out. |
Originally Posted by LeineLodge
(Post 1743942)
Excellent post.
For those of us with a few decades left this is the biggest threat. It transcends industry cycles and contracts. There is a fundamental change in the global environment and I think Mike's point was to try to shake us up a little bit and see the threat for what it is. Have I made a PAC recruiting post lately?? In DC money talks, and the ME carriers haven't been shy about tossing it around. IMO, our govt affairs guys are the best hope we have of keeping our politicians from selling us out. |
ISIS is 8 miles away from taking Baghdad Airport. That's going well.
|
Originally Posted by Sink r8
(Post 1743885)
It tells me he didn't take the bait. He works for the MEC, who work for the pilots. That's the hoop he has to jump through. You're giving him two alternatives with your rethoricals: commit to your individual vision, or write some sort of weak, non-committal response.
Originally Posted by Sink r8
(Post 1743885)
I would do neither, and focus on the problem at hand.
If want direct input, and responses, write your reps, not your reps' rep. |
Originally Posted by RockyBoy
(Post 1743905)
If the vacation you were trying to use was in the current month then they won't let you use it. It has to be unused vacation in future months. I don't get why other than it messes with their coverage. I've used future vacation before and had no problems. Just takes some time to get everyone to work it out.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:36 PM. |
|
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands