Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?
You can go on right now and buy insurance regardless of your income. You get "discounts" based on your income. I could quit Delta right now and go buy insurance that is comparable to what Delta offers for 2015. I put in $200,000 as my annual income and could purchase a plan almost identical to the Silver HSA option available in 2015 for $715 per month. I haven't looked into the income levels and where the discounts kick in, but $715 per month is a lot cheaper than COBRA through Delta.
Moderator
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,263
Likes: 105
From: DAL 330
I'm not trying to complain, I'm just saying the company has figured out how to make the trip without triggering 430 or 515. It's better than a sharp stick in the eye, and it certainly helps with they try to build a 13 hour 3 day, I'm just not buying all the chest thumping about it. Min day is the way to go, average day is what we have.
I'm not going to post the trip but for example, day one is 8:30 block, day 2 is 31 hours off in random city, day three is 7:41. Day one and three are NIGHTMARE's and you get a day off away from home with ZERO compensation for it. pay's 16:11, regardless of 430 or 515.
If that were a 2 day trip that paid 16:11, I would be much more excited about it.
I'm not going to post the trip but for example, day one is 8:30 block, day 2 is 31 hours off in random city, day three is 7:41. Day one and three are NIGHTMARE's and you get a day off away from home with ZERO compensation for it. pay's 16:11, regardless of 430 or 515.
If that were a 2 day trip that paid 16:11, I would be much more excited about it.
Yep, but just realize that if it were a 2 day that paid 16:11 someone would be on here complaining about it the next day.

Scoop
And your point is...?
My point is/was, even though we are getting a 3% raise on Jan 1. and the F/A's and others are getting 4%, operating costs will not rise above 2%, due in part to the concessions we gave up to get the 3% raise, and parking the 747's, etc.

At least we didn't leave any money on the table in 2012, you know what a mess that would have made!
Who would have to clean up that table?
Richard?
Oh...wait.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,876
Likes: 193
[QUOTE=Timbo;1747899]
And your point is...?
My point is/was, even though we are getting a 3% raise on Jan 1. and the F/A's and others are getting 4%, operating costs will not rise above 2%, due in part to the concessions we gave up to get the 3% raise, and parking the 747's, etc.
At least we didn't leave any money on the table in 2012, you know what a mess that would have made!
Who would have to clean up that table?
Richard?
Oh...wait.
The point is they know what the pilot costs will be next year.
And your point is...?
My point is/was, even though we are getting a 3% raise on Jan 1. and the F/A's and others are getting 4%, operating costs will not rise above 2%, due in part to the concessions we gave up to get the 3% raise, and parking the 747's, etc.

At least we didn't leave any money on the table in 2012, you know what a mess that would have made!
Who would have to clean up that table?
Richard?
Oh...wait.
The point is they know what the pilot costs will be next year.
They always know what pilot costs are going to be within a certain parameter. We have a contract. That's what contracts do... spell out costs. They biggest way they reduce overall costs is by reducing debt. The second is by fleet rationalization. That one is a dynamic process. In this cycle of airline growth, it is all about frequency... again, hence smaller fleets with longer legs...
And for those of you that back the bigger pays more scheme, how do you put a dollar figure on efficiency?
And for those of you that back the bigger pays more scheme, how do you put a dollar figure on efficiency?
Last edited by tsquare; 10-17-2014 at 08:35 AM.
Call your rep. Document pairings. Remember, its the FAAs doing not ALPA. In fact, I called DALPA scheduling and C. told me that he is receiving many calls from fatigued pilots. He told me to write my rep.
8+ hour domestic days are Brutal. I also think we need to have 30-32 days off AT HOME per 7 days. Layovers do not constitute rest to me. On the other hand, I look at the M88 lines and all I see are 4 leg days followed by 10-13 hour layos, ***!?
TEN
I agree completely! What I'm advocating is that 5:15 is much better than it used to be, commutable or not. I, for one, love max credit trips. I much prefer, however, to be paid for my trip and not have my 30 hour layovers count for little to nothing. It's probably equipment and base specific. I'm so done with 3-days that start with a red eye and pay 10.3.
I'm all about hard work. I'm hoping that our down time can be more efficient.
I'm all about hard work. I'm hoping that our down time can be more efficient.
report at 0003; 2 day, release at 2359. Pays 10:30, but it's essentially a 4 day--everyone, even non commuter, has to modify his schedule on pre-departure day so they get rest then get to work; and same on day following trip, home at 0200ish even for drivers. For a commuter it's a solid 4 day now paying 10:30. If they're not doing this, then at least ONE of the days, start or finish, has this in it.
I know the LAX trips and understand how 15:45 looks better than 10:30... but here's another data point agreeing with launchpad, the new trip construction to MAKE those 15:45 3 days is VERY VERY painful for many folks, especially commuters (guys at bottom of list tend to be more commuter heavy of course).
I don't like sitting for 30 hrs not getting paid--best future plan would be a Daily Min Guarantee, not an average. However, despite what I THINK when I do my bidding and try for high-value trips, when it's time to fly the thing... I actually liked 1 leg to PHL at 1800 start, 31 hours, 1 leg back home and on my commuter flight home by 1100, for 10:30 to 12:30.
If my goal in life was to work as hard as possible, and I was willing to make my work-days always 16 hours slaving for my company away from home, there are a lot of options. Hard-work with loooooong workdays is nowhere near as good as reasonable workdays that let you have a more normalish life and time with family, hardwork during that reduced window, and getting paid EVERY DAY someone makes you not be home to go see your kid's school project.
Anyhoo, I guess I agree with you LAX guys on your bidpack (wow was it bad before), but as a lowerish guy at SLC I'm reporting the trips are not as nice; 0600 takeoff 3 legs for 8:37 block or so is killing me.
I'm not trying to complain, I'm just saying the company has figured out how to make the trip without triggering 430 or 515. It's better than a sharp stick in the eye, and it certainly helps with they try to build a 13 hour 3 day, I'm just not buying all the chest thumping about it. Min day is the way to go, average day is what we have.
I'm not going to post the trip but for example, day one is 8:30 block, day 2 is 31 hours off in random city, day three is 7:41. Day one and three are NIGHTMARE's and you get a day off away from home with ZERO compensation for it. pay's 16:11, regardless of 430 or 515.
If that were a 2 day trip that paid 16:11, I would be much more excited about it.
I'm not going to post the trip but for example, day one is 8:30 block, day 2 is 31 hours off in random city, day three is 7:41. Day one and three are NIGHTMARE's and you get a day off away from home with ZERO compensation for it. pay's 16:11, regardless of 430 or 515.
If that were a 2 day trip that paid 16:11, I would be much more excited about it.
I'll play the devils advocate here. That trip would be my first choice if it was two or less long legs on days 1 and 3. 30 hour overnight for me is a slice of heaven. Don't get my wrong I love my wife and half dozen kids but this is my daddy's break while I'm working. I base my life on 65 hours a month, everything else is gravy. We ALWAYS spend what we make. My pay has doubled while I have been here and there is no excuse for ME that 65 isn't enough. So everyone wants something different.

That being said I will only vote for C2015 if it has a good chunk increase in my W2.
They always know what pilot costs are going to be within a certain parameter. We have a contract. That's what contracts do... spell out costs. They biggest way they reduce overall costs is by reducing debt. The second is by fleet rationalization. That one is a dynamic process. In this cycle of airline growth, it is all about frequency... again, hence smaller fleets with longer legs...
And for those of you that back the bigger pays more scheme, how do you put a dollar figure on efficiency?
And for those of you that back the bigger pays more scheme, how do you put a dollar figure on efficiency?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post




