Originally Posted by hockeypilot44 (Post 1780438)

Cash paid on Valentine's day.

Originally Posted by Kargo (Post 1780189)

For all those Easybid users out there;

I'm using easy bid to select specific pairings, awarding one pairing per line (2. Award pairings if pairing number XXXX, 3. Award pairings if ...). Easy bid is putting the last pairing I have selected (ie the least preferable) at the top of my bid and the first pairing I bid (the most preferable) at the bottom.

Does this make sense with PBS logic? I thought it treated the top and left as the most preferable, and the bottom and right as the least preferable. Thus it eliminates trips from bottom to top, right to left.

Very, very confused former box hauler. Thanks for your help. kargo :confused:

Originally Posted by Wilbur Wright (Post 1780462)

When use the Tag function in EasyBid it defaults to Insert at "X" where X is the highest line in your current bid. You're correct that after you insert your first choice, when you go to insert your second choice it will now go to the top of your bids unless you change X in the Tag insert window.

The easier way to do it is if you can see all the trips you want tag them in the order you want them, but don't hit insert until you've tagged them all. EasyBid will make a separate line for each trip in the order you selected it.

http://i1202.photobucket.com/albums/...ps4a33fa08.png

Originally Posted by Razorback one (Post 1780474)

Wow. Learning has occurred. All those hours of wasted effort over the years. And, I'm leaving the line in January. Will try it out in April! Thanks, WW!

R1

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar (Post 1779901)

So, if not Council 44, what is your source for all of the C44 information you post?

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar (Post 1779901)

We have got a big contract coming up. Time to pull together.

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler (Post 1779838)

...3. Management doesn't have to negotiate any JV agreements whatsoever...but they do have to abide by our overall Scope language that mandates maintaining a block hour percentage equal to what existed prior to any JV...

Originally Posted by sailingfun (Post 1779987)

This statement by Carl has a huge mistake in it. There is no block hour percentage in the current contract.

Originally Posted by sailingfun (Post 1779987)

There is a block hour floor of the existing amount of block hours to the UK.

Originally Posted by sailingfun (Post 1779987)

Under the current contract VA can have unlimited growth with Delta getting nothing.

Originally Posted by newKnow (Post 1779802)

After reading this, I have to ask. When Delta purchased 49% of VA, did that money come out of our yearly profits, and thus our profit sharing?

Originally Posted by Pineapple Guy (Post 1780007)

The real answer is NO.

Accounting 101.

Originally Posted by RockyBoy (Post 1780131)

If the numbers are correct on how much Delta saves when oil drops $1 then by 2016-17 we should be close to an 8-10B company. If that is the case our profit sharing would near 30-35% of our annual pay. :eek:

Originally Posted by RockyBoy (Post 1780131)

Who thinks it's a good idea to "monetize" profit sharing?

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler (Post 1780543)

That would be great wouldn't it. But...



Richard Anderson...our MEC chairman.

Carl

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler (Post 1780538)

What was used to purchase our 49% stake in Virgin Atlantic Pineapple Guy?

Carl