![]() |
|
Originally Posted by bluejuice71
(Post 1800140)
Is there anyway to see who got awarded what vacation weeks? I'm 60% in category and couldn't hold off any week from end of May through end of July & I'm curious how senior those weeks went. Thanks!
|
Originally Posted by MikeF16
(Post 1799965)
Unless another airline has given up it's simulator time
|
Has anyone gone thru ER school lately, just curious if OE/TOE has been on schedule of if some time off should be expected-
thanks- |
Originally Posted by Jughead135
(Post 1800166)
Well, I imagine AirTran is done with 717 sims altogether at this point--has that had a noticeable impact on sim availability...?
Yes, they are done (except for an occasional one-off event) and DAL has full use of both sims in ATL now. The "extra" sim availability was cooked into the planning long ago. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by SabreDriver
(Post 1800180)
Yes, they are done (except for an occasional one-off event) and DAL has full use of both sims in ATL now. The "extra" sim availability was cooked into the planning long ago.
|
Originally Posted by Karnak
(Post 1800130)
I think ALPA sets collective goals.
I think the MEC wants C2015 to be successfully ratified. To do that, they have to deliver a deal that meets most of the objectives of most of us. I'd expect that to be RA's goal. I'm astounded that you'd admit that it's also ALPA's goal. Shouldn't ALPA's goal be to produce a TA that 100% of the pilots want?? So much for an "historic" contract. |
Originally Posted by iaflyer
(Post 1800196)
I think his point is that we can now take airplanes at a faster rate than the last year, because we have both the sims to use.
|
The last I was told they were content with the size of ATL717B and if anything they would not replace those who bid off at the end of the initial freeze unless it got below the A side..
If there was a plane that could use some more Bs then I would think ATL73NB would be it. Are they hiring into that? |
Originally Posted by Purple Drank
(Post 1800222)
Yep. ALPA sets goals collectively with the company. Case in point:
So RA and ALPA have the same collective goal. To produce a TA that 50% +1 of the pilots will vote "yes" on.
Originally Posted by Purple Drank
(Post 1800222)
I'd expect that to be RA's goal. I'm astounded that you'd admit that it's also ALPA's goal.
Originally Posted by Purple Drank
(Post 1800222)
Shouldn't ALPA's goal be to produce a TA that 100% of the pilots want??
I suppose if I were you, and found myself constantly in the clear minority of ratification votes, I'd seek a villain to blame. It must be ALPA's fault, because there's no way your opinions could EVER be anything other than logical and universally embraced by all pilots. I look forward to you telling us the 100%-approved pilot group opinion on uniforms, hats, 5-day trips, military vs civilian, the role of seniority on Reserve, and the fairest method for Green Slip assignments. |
Originally Posted by iaflyer
(Post 1800196)
I think his point is that we can now take airplanes at a faster rate than the last year, because we have both the sims to use.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:31 PM. |
|
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands