Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?
Straight QOL, homie
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 4,202
Likes: 1
From: Record-Shattering Profit Facilitator
The company is fabricating a crisis--instilling a sense of paranoia and making us look defensively over our shoulders instead of focusing on the fact that the company is wildly profitable and we don't need to concede a THING.
I'm also guilty of biting on the company's manufactured hysteria instead of winding my watch.
Record profits. No concessions. No need to fan the company's attempt to manipulate us.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 5,113
Likes: 0
I guess we're only waiting for the next evolutions of the "Inside" series: "Inside You", "Inside You Too", and "Deep Inside You". They're almost there. Hell, thanks to UHC, they're probably there already.
1984 isn't that far ahead.
From my reps who were on the conference call. The reps made it extremely clear that profit sharing was not authorized to be changed. The NC didn't have the authority to do what they did. The reps were as clear as they could have been.
Carl
Carl
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 593
Likes: 0
Then either you're a liar, your reps are liars or you misunderstood. Which specific rep told you that TT, SS or DM, because I was on that conference call too and what you are saying is a lie.

Carl
Posted from inside scambo's unopened Surface Pro 2 box.
I don't think you were on the call reroute. If you were, you would have heard clear unambiguous language agreed to by every rep that profit sharing was not to be traded without further authorization from the reps. That authorization never came before TA2012 was signed by the NC. For you to now claim that didn't happen is a ridiculous attempt at revisionist history. I don't know who you are or what role you played on that call, but you weren't listening...if you were even there.
Carl
33 House GOP members joined in writing a letter to Transportation Secretary Anthony Foxx this past June urging him to reject the NAI bid, yet some of these members were not supported by the PAC. If the PAC were not concerned with which party a congressman was affiliated, it would seem supporting every single one of these 33 would be helpful to our cause.
Try to ease up on the thoughtless hate man.
Carl
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 593
Likes: 0
TT and SS. I didn't talk to Drew.
I don't think you were on the call reroute. If you were, you would have heard clear unambiguous language agreed to by every rep that profit sharing was not to be traded without further authorization from the reps. That authorization never came before TA2012 was signed by the NC. For you to now claim that didn't happen is a ridiculous attempt at revisionist history. I don't know who you are or what role you played on that call, but you weren't listening...if you were even there.
Carl
I don't think you were on the call reroute. If you were, you would have heard clear unambiguous language agreed to by every rep that profit sharing was not to be traded without further authorization from the reps. That authorization never came before TA2012 was signed by the NC. For you to now claim that didn't happen is a ridiculous attempt at revisionist history. I don't know who you are or what role you played on that call, but you weren't listening...if you were even there.
Carl
TT wrote quite a bit about the TA and the process, can you produce one quote of his that supports your position?
Carl
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post





