Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search
Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-30-2015, 08:26 PM
  #181721  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: DAL FO
Posts: 2,143
Default

Originally Posted by forgot to bid View Post
WaIt, no. No. No.

Despite their outward love for the 717s, Delta management would have turned down that deal they worked out with SWA and kept the CRJ200s had the pilots turned down the first TA offered. Period.




Right?

I love this argument. It's unproveable.

You could be right. Hell, PD might even be right. The fact is we will never know since the majority of the pilot group voted in the last agreement in 2012.

Maybe we could have had our cake and eaten it too. Maybe not. I do know that you and I are both benefiting from a category that DID NOT EXIST prior to C2012. Yes it might have happened anyways. Yes we could have called the bluff and it might have come to fruition. Some/All/None were all possibilities. You're too smart to ignore the possibility that it could be slightly different. To assume that we could have just said no and gotten more is just as speculative as to say we had we voted not (as a group) that we would have been sent to NMB purgatory. The point is...nobody knows.

We could still be spitting distance of the bottom of the list under the JPWA. OR you could "man up" (see Karl and PD I do have sense of humor) and bid NYC CA and GTFO my way
LeineLodge is offline  
Old 04-30-2015, 08:27 PM
  #181722  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: DAL FO
Posts: 2,143
Default

Originally Posted by forgot to bid View Post


Nick Marshall.










And my spreadsheets are solid too.
Much respect to the spreadsheet and WDE!
LeineLodge is offline  
Old 04-30-2015, 08:36 PM
  #181723  
Da Hudge
 
80ktsClamp's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Poodle Whisperer
Posts: 17,473
Default

Originally Posted by LeineLodge View Post
I love this argument. It's unproveable.

You could be right. Hell, PD might even be right. The fact is we will never know since the majority of the pilot group voted in the last agreement in 2012.

Maybe we could have had our cake and eaten it too. Maybe not. I do know that you and I are both benefiting from a category that DID NOT EXIST prior to C2012. Yes it might have happened anyways. Yes we could have called the bluff and it might have come to fruition. Some/All/None were all possibilities. You're too smart to ignore the possibility that it could be slightly different. To assume that we could have just said no and gotten more is just as speculative as to say we had we voted not (as a group) that we would have been sent to NMB purgatory. The point is...nobody knows.

We could still be spitting distance of the bottom of the list under the JPWA. OR you could "man up" (see Karl and PD I do have sense of humor) and bid NYC CA and GTFO my way
That's actually my whole point- the 717 was a sales point to push C2012 through. That is where the rub is, in my opinion, and that sort of sales job behavior from the unionoids is not ok. Give us the facts, good and bad, and let us make the call in the memory rat. Remember the whole "bigger things are coming, you won't even see the second 3 percent raise" line? We just got a .55% raise to bring us back up to the average of our peers instead. Had Caplinger not stepped on his crank so hard, that behavior would have pushed us at least to a representation vote.

In Ed's own words after the fact, the 717 was too good of a deal to pass up.

I hope they behave in a more appropriate manner this time. After my recent encounters with my new reps and an MEC higher up recently, I have more confidence this time that my hopes will be realized.
80ktsClamp is offline  
Old 04-30-2015, 08:50 PM
  #181724  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Big E 757's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Position: A320 Left seat
Posts: 2,580
Default

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp View Post
That's actually my whole point- the 717 was a sales point to push C2012 through. That is where the rub is, in my opinion, and that sort of sales job behavior from the unionoids is not ok. Give us the facts, good and bad, and let us make the call in the memory rat. Remember the whole "bigger things are coming, you won't even see the second 3 percent raise" line? We just got a .55% raise to bring us back up to the average of our peers instead. Had Caplinger not stepped on his crank so hard, that behavior would have pushed us at least to a representation vote.

In Ed's own words after the fact, the 717 was too good of a deal to pass up.

I hope they behave in a more appropriate manner this time. After my recent encounters with my new reps and an MEC higher up recently, I have more confidence this time that my hopes will be realized.

Hope is not an effective strategy!!!

This is going to be my response to everyone that "hopes" our union is going to deliver us something more ground breaking than last time.

I'm not a DPA supporter, but I've been here 15 years and the only thing that has changed is that now, when the union gets a TA with management, they sell it to us vs. just presenting it to us and allowing us to make our own decision. (And they sell it hard, but it's embarrassing)
Big E 757 is offline  
Old 04-30-2015, 09:38 PM
  #181725  
veut gagner à la loterie
 
forgot to bid's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Light Chop
Posts: 23,286
Default

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp View Post
That's actually my whole point- the 717 was a sales point to push C2012 through. That is where the rub is, in my opinion, and that sort of sales job behavior from the unionoids is not ok. Give us the facts, good and bad, and let us make the call in the memory rat. Remember the whole "bigger things are coming, you won't even see the second 3 percent raise" line? We just got a .55% raise to bring us back up to the average of our peers instead. Had Caplinger not stepped on his crank so hard, that behavior would have pushed us at least to a representation vote.

In Ed's own words after the fact, the 717 was too good of a deal to pass up.

I hope they behave in a more appropriate manner this time. After my recent encounters with my new reps and an MEC higher up recently, I have more confidence this time that my hopes will be realized.
Memory Rat.

Sailing, that will never get old.

And fwiw, I'm pretty ticked at Sailing. Because over the last week or so I've been nose to screen reading about kit built planes.



forgot to bid is offline  
Old 04-30-2015, 09:43 PM
  #181726  
Da Hudge
 
80ktsClamp's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Poodle Whisperer
Posts: 17,473
Default

Originally Posted by forgot to bid View Post
Memory Rat.

Sailing, that will never get old.

And fwiw, I'm pretty ticked at Sailing. Because over the last week or so I've been nose to screen reading about kit built planes.



Let's get some seaplane action on here too:

80ktsClamp is offline  
Old 04-30-2015, 09:47 PM
  #181727  
veut gagner à la loterie
 
forgot to bid's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Light Chop
Posts: 23,286
Default

Originally Posted by LeineLodge View Post
I love this argument. It's unproveable.

You could be right. Hell, PD might even be right. The fact is we will never know since the majority of the pilot group voted in the last agreement in 2012.

Maybe we could have had our cake and eaten it too. Maybe not. I do know that you and I are both benefiting from a category that DID NOT EXIST prior to C2012. Yes it might have happened anyways. Yes we could have called the bluff and it might have come to fruition. Some/All/None were all possibilities. You're too smart to ignore the possibility that it could be slightly different. To assume that we could have just said no and gotten more is just as speculative as to say we had we voted not (as a group) that we would have been sent to NMB purgatory. The point is...nobody knows.

We could still be spitting distance of the bottom of the list under the JPWA. OR you could "man up" (see Karl and PD I do have sense of humor) and bid NYC CA and GTFO my way
What trips are you bidding... because I'm bidding them.

My thought that concept should have never made it to memory rat because we shouldn't be working mainline aircraft purchases into the PWA.

The only thing to me in C2012 that the 717 should have been written into is the pay rates, and the demand that we replace the seat cushions with something more comfortable.
forgot to bid is offline  
Old 04-30-2015, 09:50 PM
  #181728  
veut gagner à la loterie
 
forgot to bid's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Light Chop
Posts: 23,286
Default

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp View Post
Let's get some seaplane action on here too:

That would be pretty cool too. If Lake Lanier ever opens up to sea planes... we could build one of them sea submarines (which is what we will end up with if you let me do the welding).




I swear I saw a rocket powered sailplane. Maybe a sailplane that uses a jet engine. Or used APU. Or used MD-88 APU.



Which means, it's perpetually grounded.
forgot to bid is offline  
Old 05-01-2015, 03:11 AM
  #181729  
Looking for a laugh
 
Justdoinmyjob's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 4,099
Default

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp View Post
Let's get some seaplane action on here too:

Just seemed strange when he said, "flaps set, gears up, let's go."
Justdoinmyjob is offline  
Old 05-01-2015, 04:38 AM
  #181730  
Line Holder
 
kamsman's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Posts: 56
Default

Does anyone know what the pilot uniform "refresh" is all about? Dickson mentioned it in his weekly update
kamsman is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22594
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices