Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2012
Posts: 336
Bye Bye Maddog!
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Movin' On UP........
Posts: 560
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,076
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2013
Position: Entitled rocket surgeon!
Posts: 193
With higher ALV and low credit CQ or Vacation, most pilots end up with more days of flying on their line. The company has the ability to limit the number of minimum credit lines. ALPA does not oppose this.
To drop a trip there has to be reserves available, above the required number, on all days you wish to drop.
Many categories are understaffed and with higher ALV it's nearly impossible to drop trips.
Also we have seen a large increase of longer trips in our bid packages again with no ALPA opposition.
ALV = Average Line Value
The higher the ALV the more we are all required to fly. More flying per pilot means less pilots required or less hiring required.
Notice I said required. There are always opportunities to pick up trips if you choose. The ALV/TLV is an indicator of staffing level.
The higher the ALV the more we are all required to fly. More flying per pilot means less pilots required or less hiring required.
Notice I said required. There are always opportunities to pick up trips if you choose. The ALV/TLV is an indicator of staffing level.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,108
Higher ALV requires PBS to build a line that must meet the ALV window. So if a pilot has CQ or vacation on his pre-month schedule PBS uses the credit for CQ or Vacation and then it must build a schedule to meet the ALV.
With higher ALV and low credit CQ or Vacation, most pilots end up with more days of flying on their line. The company has the ability to limit the number of minimum credit lines. ALPA does not oppose this.
To drop a trip there has to be reserves available, above the required number, on all days you wish to drop.
Many categories are understaffed and with higher ALV it's nearly impossible to drop trips.
Also we have seen a large increase of longer trips in our bid packages again with no ALPA opposition.
With higher ALV and low credit CQ or Vacation, most pilots end up with more days of flying on their line. The company has the ability to limit the number of minimum credit lines. ALPA does not oppose this.
To drop a trip there has to be reserves available, above the required number, on all days you wish to drop.
Many categories are understaffed and with higher ALV it's nearly impossible to drop trips.
Also we have seen a large increase of longer trips in our bid packages again with no ALPA opposition.
IMO we will be so short staffed within 24 months, there will be no drops on any aircraft. And they will never catch up.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2012
Position: MD musical chairs
Posts: 239
It's pretty apparent that they have no intention of catching up. Much easier to short staff the company, run pilots to the max, and beg for relief come contract time. That's why I always raise an eye brow everytime someone starts getting giddy about retirements. They have a plan to deal with retirements over the next decade and it won't be to the benefit of our seniority percentages. Too many guys think flying 90 hrs a month equates to a pay raise.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,273
They are running most categories at or near the manning formula. There was no change in the formula in the TA and I hope no change unless a increase in the next TA. It's not going to get worse.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,273
There is a common misconception with the reserves required/available matrix. Many pilots believe that it reflects desired manning in a category. It actually has nothing to do with desired or required manning. It is a contractual formula to decide if a pilot can swap or drop a trip and serves no other function.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post