Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-05-2015 | 07:28 AM
  #185181  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,108
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by thinkstraight
Higher ALV requires PBS to build a line that must meet the ALV window. So if a pilot has CQ or vacation on his pre-month schedule PBS uses the credit for CQ or Vacation and then it must build a schedule to meet the ALV.

With higher ALV and low credit CQ or Vacation, most pilots end up with more days of flying on their line. The company has the ability to limit the number of minimum credit lines. ALPA does not oppose this.
To drop a trip there has to be reserves available, above the required number, on all days you wish to drop.

Many categories are understaffed and with higher ALV it's nearly impossible to drop trips.

Also we have seen a large increase of longer trips in our bid packages again with no ALPA opposition.
And it will get worse every day for the next 10 years plus.

IMO we will be so short staffed within 24 months, there will be no drops on any aircraft. And they will never catch up.
Old 09-05-2015 | 07:50 AM
  #185182  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
From: MD musical chairs
Default

Originally Posted by gzsg
And it will get worse every day for the next 10 years plus.

IMO we will be so short staffed within 24 months, there will be no drops on any aircraft. And they will never catch up.
It's pretty apparent that they have no intention of catching up. Much easier to short staff the company, run pilots to the max, and beg for relief come contract time. That's why I always raise an eye brow everytime someone starts getting giddy about retirements. They have a plan to deal with retirements over the next decade and it won't be to the benefit of our seniority percentages. Too many guys think flying 90 hrs a month equates to a pay raise.
Old 09-05-2015 | 09:02 AM
  #185183  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,876
Likes: 193
Default

Originally Posted by gzsg
And it will get worse every day for the next 10 years plus.

IMO we will be so short staffed within 24 months, there will be no drops on any aircraft. And they will never catch up.
They are running most categories at or near the manning formula. There was no change in the formula in the TA and I hope no change unless a increase in the next TA. It's not going to get worse.
Old 09-05-2015 | 09:12 AM
  #185184  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,876
Likes: 193
Default

Originally Posted by NoDeskJob
Excuse the ignorance....what's the big deal with the higher ALV? I thought DL pilots can drop trips if reserve coverage is adequate. Is Rsv coverage never adequate? Or does the trip touch a weekend, putting one of the day's below?
You can drop a trip in the next window instantly if the reserves available table shows manning above the required. If not the trip becomes a qualified trip in open time and a pilot may take it off your line if he wants and is legal for the trip. In addition you can place the trip on the swap board for any pilot to pick up as long as they are FAR legal. They can exceed the pickup limit in that case.
There is a common misconception with the reserves required/available matrix. Many pilots believe that it reflects desired manning in a category. It actually has nothing to do with desired or required manning. It is a contractual formula to decide if a pilot can swap or drop a trip and serves no other function.
Old 09-05-2015 | 08:43 PM
  #185185  
DARR31's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 212
Likes: 0
From: 1 step fwd 2 steps back
Default

Originally Posted by MikeF16
No kidding. Even with a week of vacation I still have to fly 3 trips to fill up.
I hear ya! Waiting to get res next month in order to get required days off for the privlage of having vacation.

Vacation and CQ days should be worth 5:15, period!

NO CONESSIONS!
Old 09-06-2015 | 05:16 AM
  #185186  
:-)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,339
Likes: 1
Default

You 737-900 guys have balls of steel. I think I'd crap my pants on that take off roll. Saw one today just get off the ground prior to reaching the numbers on the opposite side. I know it's all calculated, but whoa.
Old 09-06-2015 | 05:47 AM
  #185187  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,688
Likes: 66
Default

Sounds like a 727 with -7 engines or a J powered 747F



Originally Posted by Mesabah
You 737-900 guys have balls of steel. I think I'd crap my pants on that take off roll. Saw one today just get off the ground prior to reaching the numbers on the opposite side. I know it's all calculated, but whoa.
Old 09-06-2015 | 05:57 AM
  #185188  
Doug Masters's Avatar
Weekend and Holiday Pilot
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,152
Likes: 1
From: Sippin' at the Troubadour
Default

Originally Posted by Mesabah
You 737-900 guys have balls of steel. I think I'd crap my pants on that take off roll. Saw one today just get off the ground prior to reaching the numbers on the opposite side. I know it's all calculated, but whoa.
There have been a few times where I'm looking at the speed tape then the end of the runway, speed tape/runway, speed tape/runway wondering if its gonna work. I wonder of there is an equation for so much speed to go before V1 versus so much runway remaining.
Old 09-06-2015 | 05:59 AM
  #185189  
bohicagain's Avatar
looking for underboob
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 914
Likes: 4
From: NYC 7ER LCA
Default

Originally Posted by Mesabah
You 737-900 guys have balls of steel. I think I'd crap my pants on that take off roll. Saw one today just get off the ground prior to reaching the numbers on the opposite side. I know it's all calculated, but whoa.
Balls of aluminum is more like it. No one wants a tail strike so that's what's on everyone's mind. Not the length remaining
Old 09-06-2015 | 06:49 AM
  #185190  
:-)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,339
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by bohicagain
Balls of aluminum is more like it. No one wants a tail strike so that's what's on everyone's mind. Not the length remaining
Oh, but Vr is calculated for tailstrike protection. I was under the impression there was a large spread between v1 and vr causing late rotation. Oh well, nvm.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22617
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices