Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-02-2009 | 02:22 PM
  #19261  
Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,088
Likes: 0
From: B757/767
Default

Originally Posted by alfaromeo
Are we really going to do this again? Some stupid rumor from some anonymous webboard and now the thrashing begins. Pretty soon this rumor will be reposted on the ALPA webboard and then it will be listed as dual sourced. Pretty soon the outrage will start, the emails will fly, and then it will be shown to be nothing but the echo chamber working again. Maybe after the fifth or sixth time this has happened you would think people would figure it out. I guess not.

The negotiators could not "entertain" this idea if they had not briefed the MEC. If they had briefed the MEC it would already be out.

This is just worthless rumor mongering.
No Sir, rumor or not I will NEVER take it lightly. And the fact that ANY DALPA elected rep would scares me. The flood of posts, phone calls, & emails that have gone out today further reiterate that many in this pilot group will also never take this lightly.

Fear mongering or not, this will always cause us to SQUAWK. Flame away.
Old 12-02-2009 | 02:32 PM
  #19262  
dragon's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,601
Likes: 0
From: Dismayed
Default

Originally Posted by alfaromeo
Are we really going to do this again? Some stupid rumor from some anonymous webboard and now the thrashing begins. Pretty soon this rumor will be reposted on the ALPA webboard and then it will be listed as dual sourced. Pretty soon the outrage will start, the emails will fly, and then it will be shown to be nothing but the echo chamber working again. Maybe after the fifth or sixth time this has happened you would think people would figure it out. I guess not.

The negotiators could not "entertain" this idea if they had not briefed the MEC. If they had briefed the MEC it would already be out.

This is just worthless rumor mongering.
I don't think the bold part is accurate. For the past year or two, the first indication the membership has that an issue is being discussed is when the LOA is announced.

However, the communique from the MEC on the JAL thing was a very good step in the right direction. A little tardy but since the negotiations are still underway, a good thing.
Old 12-02-2009 | 02:43 PM
  #19263  
Check Essential's Avatar
Works Every Weekend
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,506
Likes: 0
From: 737 ATL
Default

Originally Posted by alfaromeo
Are we really going to do this again? Some stupid rumor from some anonymous webboard and now the thrashing begins..
I too wish we didn't have to do this again.
But the explanation is quite simple. This rumor has credibility and caused "thrashing" only because people don't trust Lee Moak to hold the line on scope and because he has a record of making secret deals.
Its kinda sad that so many guys are scared of what their own MEC Chairman might do, but here we are.
Old 12-02-2009 | 03:00 PM
  #19264  
Doug Masters's Avatar
Weekend and Holiday Pilot
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,152
Likes: 1
From: Sippin' at the Troubadour
Default

Just to echo what Nu said I also talked to the 44 Chair today and his response was "hell no, not only is it a clear violation of secion 1 but it would be political suicide."
Old 12-02-2009 | 03:19 PM
  #19265  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,876
Likes: 193
Default

Originally Posted by johnso29
Anyone have an update on this? Just last month on Ed's online chat he said they would retire the 30/40's over the next 18 months. That would keep them flying through 2010, yes? Do you think they'll staff to have them gone, and just hire if they decide to keep them longer? Can they even plan that far out?

The plan as of two weeks ago was to keep most if not all of the remaining 30's and 40's flying through next summer then a rapid retirement in the fall with all the airframes gone by Jan 11.
Old 12-02-2009 | 03:28 PM
  #19266  
iaflyer's Avatar
seeing the country...
15 Years
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,014
Likes: 41
From: 73N A
Default

Originally Posted by Doug Masters
Just to echo what Nu said I also talked to the 44 Chair today and his response was "hell no, not only is it a clear violation of secion 1 but it would be political suicide."
Glad to hear that - the first part can be solved with a quick LOA we find out after the fact, so I'm not paying much attention to that. The "political suicide" is another matter - most elected reps like their position and don't want to be kicked out.
Old 12-02-2009 | 03:50 PM
  #19267  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,876
Likes: 193
Default

Originally Posted by acl65pilot
It was put out there by one of the credible posters on FI.

I stated a few weeks ago that this was one of my fears. Our C44 reps and elected reps are saying no way, it would be political suicide, but time will tell.

This makes a lot of sense for the company to do this. 175/195 are the same type and it costs no more to have CPS fly it.

The response is simple. Our jet, or pilot our contract. You want it flown on their cert fine. But by us at our wages.

Wonder what we think of splitting them out now?

Guys, just email your reps or pick up the phone and call them. I just did and here are the facts.
1. The company has not asked or even hinted for aircraft with more then 76 seats at DCI or Compass.
2. The company has not asked or even hinted for aircraft with more then 76 seats at DCI or Compass.

Entire rumor groundless and baseless.
Old 12-02-2009 | 04:03 PM
  #19268  
Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,088
Likes: 0
From: B757/767
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
The plan as of two weeks ago was to keep most if not all of the remaining 30's and 40's flying through next summer then a rapid retirement in the fall with all the airframes gone by Jan 11.
Thanks for the reply sailingfun. Since it sounds like this AE will be a 365 day conversion window, & the plan is to have the 30/40's parked by January 2011, does anyone think that there might actually be a surplus on the DC9? The DC9 fleet will essentially be cut in half, so would that be accounted for in this AE?
Old 12-02-2009 | 04:05 PM
  #19269  
acl65pilot's Avatar
Happy to be here
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 18,563
Likes: 0
From: A-320A
Default

Depends on which version of the AE you are looking at. Some have stated plenty.

Might be bigger and better than our wildest dreams. But who cares, it is what it is

Sailing,
Good to know, but they need the right jet up on a lot those LGA slots.
Old 12-02-2009 | 04:06 PM
  #19270  
acl65pilot's Avatar
Happy to be here
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 18,563
Likes: 0
From: A-320A
Default

Originally Posted by iaflyer
Glad to hear that - the first part can be solved with a quick LOA we find out after the fact, so I'm not paying much attention to that. The "political suicide" is another matter - most elected reps like their position and don't want to be kicked out.
Better yet, some are lame ducks and will be on the line so they would have to live it.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22617
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices