Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 3,599
Likes: 46
Not sure I understand all this "talk" about fix QOL, "I'm happy with the pay rates".
I think one point that we have been missing is inflation, which has been historically low. Let's assume that inflation is 3%(pick your own number). so if one is making 200k a year then you would have to make 206K next year to "keep up with inflation" ?..........that is a fool's bet. By the time I pay the taxes on that $6000 increase to "keep up with inflation"....I'm still losing out
Consequently, pay rates must go up by at least 1.35 time the inflation rate(even more if you live in a state with state tax)(CA it's broaching 12%)(and union dues).....for these individuals need to go up about 1.5 times the inflation rate just to maintain status quo with inflation. I suggest that too many pilots look at the $$$$$ increase and say "Oh, goody" and don't really parse out the nuances of inflation COMBINED with tax implications. This is prolly even more true of guys down in years 1-12 where they get longevity raises on top of the annual negotiated pay raise( their manna from heaven) doubles the rate of those who have "graduated high school" (post grades 1-12)
So, IMO, pay rates need to to be paired with scope as the top line priority......far, far ahead of the other "trivial" stuff. Better medical would be nice.....but some don't use the Delta plan so they are "subsidizing" other pilots gains, whereas an across the board pay rate would affect all equally. Same is true of DH/ RR/crew meals etc
I think one point that we have been missing is inflation, which has been historically low. Let's assume that inflation is 3%(pick your own number). so if one is making 200k a year then you would have to make 206K next year to "keep up with inflation" ?..........that is a fool's bet. By the time I pay the taxes on that $6000 increase to "keep up with inflation"....I'm still losing out
Consequently, pay rates must go up by at least 1.35 time the inflation rate(even more if you live in a state with state tax)(CA it's broaching 12%)(and union dues).....for these individuals need to go up about 1.5 times the inflation rate just to maintain status quo with inflation. I suggest that too many pilots look at the $$$$$ increase and say "Oh, goody" and don't really parse out the nuances of inflation COMBINED with tax implications. This is prolly even more true of guys down in years 1-12 where they get longevity raises on top of the annual negotiated pay raise( their manna from heaven) doubles the rate of those who have "graduated high school" (post grades 1-12)
So, IMO, pay rates need to to be paired with scope as the top line priority......far, far ahead of the other "trivial" stuff. Better medical would be nice.....but some don't use the Delta plan so they are "subsidizing" other pilots gains, whereas an across the board pay rate would affect all equally. Same is true of DH/ RR/crew meals etc
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 5,145
Likes: 111
Not sure I understand all this "talk" about fix QOL, "I'm happy with the pay rates".
I think one point that we have been missing is inflation, which has been historically low. Let's assume that inflation is 3%(pick your own number). so if one is making 200k a year then you would have to make 206K next year to "keep up with inflation" ?..........that is a fool's bet. By the time I pay the taxes on that $6000 increase to "keep up with inflation"....I'm still losing out
Consequently, pay rates must go up by at least 1.35 time the inflation rate(even more if you live in a state with state tax)(CA it's broaching 12%)(and union dues).....for these individuals need to go up about 1.5 times the inflation rate just to maintain status quo with inflation. I suggest that too many pilots look at the $$$$$ increase and say "Oh, goody" and don't really parse out the nuances of inflation COMBINED with tax implications. This is prolly even more true of guys down in years 1-12 where they get longevity raises on top of the annual negotiated pay raise( their manna from heaven) doubles the rate of those who have "graduated high school" (post grades 1-12)
So, IMO, pay rates need to to be paired with scope as the top line priority......far, far ahead of the other "trivial" stuff. Better medical would be nice.....but some don't use the Delta plan so they are "subsidizing" other pilots gains, whereas an across the board pay rate would affect all equally. Same is true of DH/ RR/crew meals etc
I think one point that we have been missing is inflation, which has been historically low. Let's assume that inflation is 3%(pick your own number). so if one is making 200k a year then you would have to make 206K next year to "keep up with inflation" ?..........that is a fool's bet. By the time I pay the taxes on that $6000 increase to "keep up with inflation"....I'm still losing out
Consequently, pay rates must go up by at least 1.35 time the inflation rate(even more if you live in a state with state tax)(CA it's broaching 12%)(and union dues).....for these individuals need to go up about 1.5 times the inflation rate just to maintain status quo with inflation. I suggest that too many pilots look at the $$$$$ increase and say "Oh, goody" and don't really parse out the nuances of inflation COMBINED with tax implications. This is prolly even more true of guys down in years 1-12 where they get longevity raises on top of the annual negotiated pay raise( their manna from heaven) doubles the rate of those who have "graduated high school" (post grades 1-12)
So, IMO, pay rates need to to be paired with scope as the top line priority......far, far ahead of the other "trivial" stuff. Better medical would be nice.....but some don't use the Delta plan so they are "subsidizing" other pilots gains, whereas an across the board pay rate would affect all equally. Same is true of DH/ RR/crew meals etc
I won't turn down more money, but it isn't my own priority any more than improved DH might be for someone else. To each their own.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 3,599
Likes: 46
Actually, it’s hard for me to imagine a world where more money doesn’t buy most QOL issues. Positive space for vacay? More money and I’ll buy my own tickets if I choose to travel. Better medical deductibles? More money and poof, it’s taken care of. Don’t use Delta’s medical plans- - - use the money as you see fit. In a category where you deadhead? Make an option to pay for an upgrade to a window or an aisle or business or 1st if available....more money and done. Think you work too many hours? More money and throw them on the icrew swap board. Rarely see a “just pick up” that doesn’t get picked up. Unless or course coverage is tight and they don’t pick up the straight time hoping for the green.
Remember years ago when the company offered crew meals? No? If I remember correctly, one iteration was you could order a crew meal...only catch being that they deducted a pro rata share out of you per diem......Nobody (or almost nobody) availed themselves of that opportunity in the name of safety......it was all about the benjamins
Since we have a “mature contract”, most gains outside of pay will entail one group “subsidizing” another’s groups gains. Scope and pay are two areas that mostly avoid that.
I am certainly not saying don’t try to improve areas, all I request is that we all be intellectually honest and acknowledge we may be picking winners and losers. No contract should provide a windfall to one group of pilots over another.
I can certainly understand a 3 year new Delta captain might have “enough” money, but there are a lot of pilots that endured the lost decade. That is why we all get one vote.
Remember years ago when the company offered crew meals? No? If I remember correctly, one iteration was you could order a crew meal...only catch being that they deducted a pro rata share out of you per diem......Nobody (or almost nobody) availed themselves of that opportunity in the name of safety......it was all about the benjamins
Since we have a “mature contract”, most gains outside of pay will entail one group “subsidizing” another’s groups gains. Scope and pay are two areas that mostly avoid that.
I am certainly not saying don’t try to improve areas, all I request is that we all be intellectually honest and acknowledge we may be picking winners and losers. No contract should provide a windfall to one group of pilots over another.
I can certainly understand a 3 year new Delta captain might have “enough” money, but there are a lot of pilots that endured the lost decade. That is why we all get one vote.
I think this could go either way. If we go first and "knock it outta the park", sure our costs will go up. However, if UAL and AA don't follow suit with a "me too" contract, their labor strife and lack of "competitiveness" will self fund Delta's new contract.
If AA and UAL go first(they have less bargaining power) we may not like our starting position.....however they are already more radicalized then we are(which helps us) and they have seen how voting a TA down helps to raise the bar.
I'm hoping they go first....vote it down, thereby establishing unacceptable parameters, and we come in behind(with a wind at our back) due to our outstanding revenue numbers
If AA and UAL go first(they have less bargaining power) we may not like our starting position.....however they are already more radicalized then we are(which helps us) and they have seen how voting a TA down helps to raise the bar.
I'm hoping they go first....vote it down, thereby establishing unacceptable parameters, and we come in behind(with a wind at our back) due to our outstanding revenue numbers
Banned
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 8,831
Likes: 499
Nah, probably not.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 5,145
Likes: 111
Actually, it’s hard for me to imagine a world where more money doesn’t buy most QOL issues. Positive space for vacay? More money and I’ll buy my own tickets if I choose to travel. Better medical deductibles? More money and poof, it’s taken care of. Don’t use Delta’s medical plans- - - use the money as you see fit. In a category where you deadhead? Make an option to pay for an upgrade to a window or an aisle or business or 1st if available....more money and done. Think you work too many hours? More money and throw them on the icrew swap board. Rarely see a “just pick up” that doesn’t get picked up. Unless or course coverage is tight and they don’t pick up the straight time hoping for the green.
Actually, it’s hard for me to imagine a world where more money doesn’t buy most QOL issues. Positive space for vacay? More money and I’ll buy my own tickets if I choose to travel. Better medical deductibles? More money and poof, it’s taken care of. Don’t use Delta’s medical plans- - - use the money as you see fit. In a category where you deadhead? Make an option to pay for an upgrade to a window or an aisle or business or 1st if available....more money and done. Think you work too many hours? More money and throw them on the icrew swap board. Rarely see a “just pick up” that doesn’t get picked up. Unless or course coverage is tight and they don’t pick up the straight time hoping for the green.
Remember years ago when the company offered crew meals? No? If I remember correctly, one iteration was you could order a crew meal...only catch being that they deducted a pro rata share out of you per diem......Nobody (or almost nobody) availed themselves of that opportunity in the name of safety......it was all about the benjamins
Since we have a “mature contract”, most gains outside of pay will entail one group “subsidizing” another’s groups gains. Scope and pay are two areas that mostly avoid that.
I am certainly not saying don’t try to improve areas, all I request is that we all be intellectually honest and acknowledge we may be picking winners and losers. No contract should provide a windfall to one group of pilots over another.
I can certainly understand a 3 year new Delta captain might have “enough” money, but there are a lot of pilots that endured the lost decade. That is why we all get one vote.
Remember years ago when the company offered crew meals? No? If I remember correctly, one iteration was you could order a crew meal...only catch being that they deducted a pro rata share out of you per diem......Nobody (or almost nobody) availed themselves of that opportunity in the name of safety......it was all about the benjamins
Since we have a “mature contract”, most gains outside of pay will entail one group “subsidizing” another’s groups gains. Scope and pay are two areas that mostly avoid that.
I am certainly not saying don’t try to improve areas, all I request is that we all be intellectually honest and acknowledge we may be picking winners and losers. No contract should provide a windfall to one group of pilots over another.
I can certainly understand a 3 year new Delta captain might have “enough” money, but there are a lot of pilots that endured the lost decade. That is why we all get one vote.
QOL has been the “back door” to more pay since... forever. And there’s the added bonus of choice, which allows everyone the ability to value their time as they see fit.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 2,286
Likes: 18
I can’t monetize my time at home with the family. It’s priceless to me.
so Jet Airways just shut down
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post




