Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-24-2010 | 05:36 PM
  #35811  
DAL 88 Driver's Avatar
At home on the maddog!
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 2,874
Likes: 0
From: Retired (mandatory age 65)
Default

Originally Posted by Pineapple Guy
And I believe that the profession, at the majors, unfortunately, will be able to attract pilots who are safe at current wage rates. I wish it weren't so; I really do. Perhaps they are not as safe as you or I; that's pretty tough to judge. But I'm confident those who make it to the majors will be safe.

The regionals are a different story; and on several occasions, I've stopped flying certain regional carriers when the hiring standards dropped too low in my personal opinion. But with the majors, even at current rates, I don't think you can play the safety card successfully. Just my opinion.
And where are these pilots going to come from in the future? I can't see too many military pilots wanting to fly for the airlines when they can make just as much staying in the military (and get their military retirement) or by pursuing any number of other careers that are just as lucrative or more lucrative. And if the civilians are going to be lower quality individuals (because the profession no longer pays well enough to attract them), then where are you going to find quality pilots for the majors. You can't just wave a magic wand and... poof... you have a quality pilot!

I fully understand that there are still plenty of quality individuals in the pipeline at regionals to supply the majors for a few more years. But once that pipeline dries up, what will we have left? It seems to me that all it takes is a little foresight on this issue. Look beyond the snapshot of what you see today.
Old 04-24-2010 | 05:36 PM
  #35812  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,233
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by reddog25
Actually, UAUA got theirs because of the strike of NWA. Both UAL and DAL saw how much money the company could lose in 2 weeks with airplanes sitting on the ground.

If you are not willing to strike, you will get whatever the company deems you are worth. Never saw a CEO fly an airplane

Let's get ready to put those spiffy hats to good use and put em on our head to keep the sun off our heads as we walk around in circles.
Good post. I like short strikes too. Germans are smart. Most important thing - got to have your stike fund. Then you feel willing and ready.
Old 04-24-2010 | 05:37 PM
  #35813  
Beagle Pilot's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 427
Likes: 0
From: EMB-145
Default

Originally Posted by forgot to bid
Beagle Pilot gets the daily double.

Now ask Alex for "Air Disasters for 500"
What is a scope clause, Alex?
Old 04-24-2010 | 05:42 PM
  #35814  
DAL 88 Driver's Avatar
At home on the maddog!
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 2,874
Likes: 0
From: Retired (mandatory age 65)
Default

Originally Posted by Pineapple Guy
I mistyped in my previous post. That's been fixed. But the point remains that if increasing ticket prices by $5 was so easy, why don't you think any airline has done that?
They did. What do you think happened in the summer of 2008 when fuel prices went through the roof? Those ticket prices that they just couldn't possibly raise without killing demand... well, suddenly, they couldn't raise them fast enough. And people kept flying! And then there's all those bag fees they've been able to successfully charge the past couple of years. I guess it all falls into the "where there's a will, there's a way" category...
Old 04-24-2010 | 05:42 PM
  #35815  
Schwanker's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,324
Likes: 53
Default

Originally Posted by reddog25
Actually, UAUA got theirs because of the strike of NWA. Both UAL and DAL saw how much money the company could lose in 2 weeks with airplanes sitting on the ground.

If you are not willing to strike, you will get whatever the company deems you are worth. Never saw a CEO fly an airplane

Let's get ready to put those spiffy hats to good use and put em on our head to keep the sun off our heads as we walk around in circles.
Lots of Kook-Aide drinkers in the crowd. I wonder if the stones are there to do it again if required???
Old 04-24-2010 | 06:00 PM
  #35816  
hoserpilot's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,026
Likes: 0
From: maddoggy dog
Default

Originally Posted by DAL 88 Driver
They did. What do you think happened in the summer of 2008 when fuel prices went through the roof? Those ticket prices that they just couldn't possibly raise without killing demand... well, suddenly, they couldn't raise them fast enough. And people kept flying! And then there's all those bag fees they've been able to successfully charge the past couple of years. I guess it all falls into the "where there's a will, there's a way" category...

Hopefully a Cal/Ual merger will help to erase some capacity for a short time. Then we can get that paltry 5 bucks more per ticket. It bums me out when my captains tell me how much more they made when they were FO's.
Old 04-24-2010 | 06:09 PM
  #35817  
Pineapple Guy's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,462
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by DAL 88 Driver
They did. What do you think happened in the summer of 2008 when fuel prices went through the roof? Those ticket prices that they just couldn't possibly raise without killing demand... well, suddenly, they couldn't raise them fast enough. And people kept flying! And then there's all those bag fees they've been able to successfully charge the past couple of years. I guess it all falls into the "where there's a will, there's a way" category...
So, why aren't they doing it now? Why are all airlines still losing money?

I guess I should add airline CEO to the list of occupations you can do better than anyone currently in place.
Old 04-24-2010 | 06:13 PM
  #35818  
acl65pilot's Avatar
Happy to be here
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 18,563
Likes: 0
From: A-320A
Default

Originally Posted by reddog25
Actually, UAUA got theirs because of the strike of NWA. Both UAL and DAL saw how much money the company could lose in 2 weeks with airplanes sitting on the ground.

If you are not willing to strike, you will get whatever the company deems you are worth. Never saw a CEO fly an airplane

Let's get ready to put those spiffy hats to good use and put em on our head to keep the sun off our heads as we walk around in circles.
I do not argue that. It does prove the point that pattern bargaining is the way we get to where we want to be.

I am would not be surprised to see us doing a little walking in circles. Not sure if it would ever get to a work action, but all must be willing.
Old 04-24-2010 | 06:15 PM
  #35819  
Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,263
Likes: 105
From: DAL 330
Default

Originally Posted by Pineapple Guy
I know exactly what you're saying. And while I'd like to believe you, I don't. Public sympathy for Colgan pilots making $16k/year is just not going to transfer to DAL pilots making $200k. The lowest DAL captain makes $151/hr. So you tell me the public is going to feel sorry for us when DAL publishes that the "average DAL Captain" makes $175k/year? I wish it were so.



Just a couple of thoughts on the subject:

Agree with the above 100%. We will definitely get killed on the PR battle because of the way our pay is calculated. Personally I could give a crap what Joe Sixpack thinks about our wages, but in fact, it is a very important factor -management will definitely try to use that against us and we better be prepared for it. We may have to look at differing ways to increase our compensation - ways that don't make us all appear to be living the Lifestyles of the Rich and Famous. Especially if some of us are eating macaroni and cheese in a moldy crashpad! (Which fortunately I am not - but just saying .

Just because someone thinks a 20, 40, 60 or even a 100% pay raise is unrealistic does not detract from the discussion. Lets keep the discussion civil and on topic. Management will definitely take this stance so lets start playing devils advocate now - I sure hope the Union guys are doing so.

Lastly - we must be willing to take chances to be effective. If we are not willing to risk anything we will probably not get much. We may have to risk a lot more than some guys are willing to risk - so where is the Union PR telling us to start saving up a "strike fund?" I guess it might be too early and maybe we are going to try the "soft" approach as an opener (I said soft not lowball). Maybe this will work out good, and maybe it won't but personally I will be financially ready to weather whatever storm may come our way.

One thing that I do realize is that we have 12,000 + different personal situations going into negotiations - if we are unwilling to accept and respect differing opinions form within our ranks and allow management to effectively pit us against each other, we are toast.



Scoop
Old 04-24-2010 | 06:18 PM
  #35820  
acl65pilot's Avatar
Happy to be here
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 18,563
Likes: 0
From: A-320A
Default

Originally Posted by Schwanker
Lots of Kook-Aide drinkers in the crowd. I wonder if the stones are there to do it again if required???
Why do you think I am doing everything in my power to be debt free by 2012. It is called being prepared.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22617
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices