Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?
05-07-2010 | 05:59 AM
Line Holder
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
From: 767 FO
Dont confuse the 2 reports PG. 22 D 3 is the bodies report and the new one will not be out until after the bid results are posted. the 22 d 2 for the 22 d 3 report that is shown is dated 12/2009 and the required staffing for it shows 9383. That is the report that was removed.
clear as mud, no
05-07-2010 | 06:01 AM
Moderator
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,088
Likes: 0
From: B757/767
From 2009 Copy DTW 320 B 254
From 4/2010 DTW 320 B 249
So it went down by 5. I have watched the NYC 7ERB (my cat) for the last three years and the actual bodies are about 30 higher than the required number. So in effect -5 seems like no change, unless of course your the plug
From 4/2010 DTW 320 B 249
So it went down by 5. I have watched the NYC 7ERB (my cat) for the last three years and the actual bodies are about 30 higher than the required number. So in effect -5 seems like no change, unless of course your the plug
My concern is the CVG 7ER closure. It's only a 3 hour drive to DTW. I think us DTW guys will see a lot of CVG guys flock up here, then the backwards bump outs will begin. That's when I may get the boot.
05-07-2010 | 06:02 AM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,206
Likes: 0
From: DAL FO
based on the count in iCrew. Be interesting to see the AE.
05-07-2010 | 06:05 AM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,206
Likes: 0
From: DAL FO
The time/date stamp on the bottom of the staffing report shows over a week ago. There may still be some things changing, so who knows.
05-07-2010 | 06:07 AM
Line Holder
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
From: 767 FO
That Nov 2010 is the min staffing. the actual bodies report is always higher. for example from the last bid in dec the 22 d 2 report showed DTW 755 B as 171(this is min staffing) The 22 d 3 report that came out AFTER the bid was publised show the category acutal bodies as 200. So that category has 29 people in it over the min required by contract. I do not believe they can run the airline at min staffing (the 22 D 2 number)
05-07-2010 | 06:13 AM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,206
Likes: 0
From: DAL FO
That Nov 2010 is the min staffing. the actual bodies report is always higher. for example from the last bid in dec the 22 d 2 report showed DTW 755 B as 171(this is min staffing) The 22 d 3 report that came out AFTER the bid was publised show the category acutal bodies as 200. So that category has 29 people in it over the min required by contract. I do not believe they can run the airline at min staffing (the 22 D 2 number)
05-07-2010 | 06:17 AM
Moderator
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,088
Likes: 0
From: B757/767
05-07-2010 | 06:19 AM
Happy to be here
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 18,563
Likes: 0
From: A-320A
Well they have the pop up reminding guys to check the box for reinstatement.........
05-07-2010 | 06:21 AM
Happy to be here
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 18,563
Likes: 0
From: A-320A
That Nov 2010 is the min staffing. the actual bodies report is always higher. for example from the last bid in dec the 22 d 2 report showed DTW 755 B as 171(this is min staffing) The 22 d 3 report that came out AFTER the bid was publised show the category acutal bodies as 200. So that category has 29 people in it over the min required by contract. I do not believe they can run the airline at min staffing (the 22 D 2 number)
05-07-2010 | 06:24 AM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,462
Likes: 0
Dont confuse the 2 reports PG. 22 D 3 is the bodies report and the new one will not be out until after the bid results are posted. the 22 d 2 for the 22 d 3 report that is shown is dated 12/2009 and the required staffing for it shows 9383. That is the report that was removed.
clear as mud, no
clear as mud, no
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
