Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?
Yeah, that'd be nice but I don't see it happening. I just wish they'd give more then 1.5-2 hours of notice. GS are not often commuter friendly. I did one last month that worked really nice for me with the extra pay and payback days, but I had to haul tail to the airport and park in long term and still barely made my flight.
It's a lot of stress for me, and a lot of times the money isn't worth the stress IMO.
It's a lot of stress for me, and a lot of times the money isn't worth the stress IMO.
Heck I do not even have one in. I am just going to enjoy the weekend.
Moderator
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,088
Likes: 0
From: B757/767
GS are generally short notice since they cannot cover them with reserve pilots. Only when you get in to a position where there are no reserves for the next day to you see 12+ hr notification for GS's. It does happen though.
Heck I do not even have one in. I am just going to enjoy the weekend.
Heck I do not even have one in. I am just going to enjoy the weekend.

Hope you do enjoy the weekend. I'm starting 4+ days on tomorrow.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,539
Likes: 0
Let me see if I can move some of the irritation in the correct direction, management.
We are complaining quite a bit about "holes" in the contract and things that we should have cherry picked from both PWAs.
They are valid complaints because there are very few times that a pilot group will have that much leverage in a negotiation.
We are complaining quite a bit about "holes" in the contract and things that we should have cherry picked from both PWAs.
They are valid complaints because there are very few times that a pilot group will have that much leverage in a negotiation.
We could have "timed" ourselves into no merger. Remember $147 bbl oil just 4 months after the merger was announced? Remember every major air carrier furloughed pilots (UAL 1450, AMR has over 1800 out, CAL 147, ALA, even the regionals (DCI had over 1000 out). Had AMEX not agreed to the cash infusion, we'd have both been screwed.
That's not a lot of leverage in my book.
So both pre-merger pilot groups could be sitting back wondering when everyone was going to get recalled rather than how many we're going to hire. (The premerger NWA group complaining here wouldn't have been worried about newhires getting more DC than them, they'd be worried about when they were going to get a paycheck again.) Both could be sitting at real bankruptcy pay rates rather than the JCBA rates and 5.6% of the company in their accounts. On the Delta side we'd have opened section 6 in the heart of the airline recession. Great timing...
I'll pass on the leverage that you have to offer. We'll get to see a lot of who's right in the UAUA/CAL dance ahead of us. Merging seniority lists with a disparate number of guys on furlough would have been fun.....
I have to agree with Slow. The merge created a hype in the financial sector that allowed a large cash infusion as well as great rates on restructuring bad debts in the worst credit markets in history. This mergers allowed all of that "hype" to work to OUR companies advantage. In turn it was good for us. This benefit may not be apparent to many, but it is there.
Oh well, I can certainly think of worse things. My question was actually more of an inquiry about the A320 than what I could hold seniority wise. I don't think I have ever set foot in one. Don't know much about the machine. Thanks for your response. I appreciate it.
Inventory survival kit ..
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,069
Likes: 0
From: Seeking no jacket required rotations
I cannot disagree with you more.
We could have "timed" ourselves into no merger. Remember $147 bbl oil just 4 months after the merger was announced? Remember every major air carrier furloughed pilots (UAL 1450, AMR has over 1800 out, CAL 147, ALA, even the regionals (DCI had over 1000 out). Had AMEX not agreed to the cash infusion, we'd have both been screwed.
That's not a lot of leverage in my book.
So both pre-merger pilot groups could be sitting back wondering when everyone was going to get recalled rather than how many we're going to hire. (The premerger NWA group complaining here wouldn't have been worried about newhires getting more DC than them, they'd be worried about when they were going to get a paycheck again.) Both could be sitting at real bankruptcy pay rates rather than the JCBA rates and 5.6% of the company in their accounts. On the Delta side we'd have opened section 6 in the heart of the airline recession. Great timing...
I'll pass on the leverage that you have to offer. We'll get to see a lot of who's right in the UAUA/CAL dance ahead of us. Merging seniority lists with a disparate number of guys on furlough would have been fun.....
We could have "timed" ourselves into no merger. Remember $147 bbl oil just 4 months after the merger was announced? Remember every major air carrier furloughed pilots (UAL 1450, AMR has over 1800 out, CAL 147, ALA, even the regionals (DCI had over 1000 out). Had AMEX not agreed to the cash infusion, we'd have both been screwed.
That's not a lot of leverage in my book.
So both pre-merger pilot groups could be sitting back wondering when everyone was going to get recalled rather than how many we're going to hire. (The premerger NWA group complaining here wouldn't have been worried about newhires getting more DC than them, they'd be worried about when they were going to get a paycheck again.) Both could be sitting at real bankruptcy pay rates rather than the JCBA rates and 5.6% of the company in their accounts. On the Delta side we'd have opened section 6 in the heart of the airline recession. Great timing...
I'll pass on the leverage that you have to offer. We'll get to see a lot of who's right in the UAUA/CAL dance ahead of us. Merging seniority lists with a disparate number of guys on furlough would have been fun.....
IMO pilots only have limited opportunities to obtain GREAT leverage. Mergers that management wants, LBOs that want pilot support and strikes. A strike is not a good thing but it's purpose is leverage. LBOs give you short term leverage at the possible expense of long term corporate health. Mergers give leverage depending on the circumstances surrounding them. You and I disagree quite a bit on the circumstances. We'll just have to agree to disagree.
So much for focusing the irritation on management.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,539
Likes: 0
Just a reminder, the cash and cash equivalent for both pre-merger companies was all debt. Both were junk rated companies. So where you write of DAL, you could easily replace it with NWA.

I reread your post. I didn't see a focus on management. I saw a focus on the JCBA and how it was negotiated (management beat us again...)
Well, on a different note, I went to a Fltops management meeting and here are some of the highlights:
- Do not anticipate getting any 787’s for 18 to 24 months
- MD 90 qualification for NYC in Fall this year, ATL in Spring of next year
- Next AE Bid in Sep-Oct time frame
- Possible additional 747, 777 crews
- possible a few more 7ER crews in SEA
- SLC to ER category
- status quo for equipment base re-alignment…no equipment moves…..do not Want to “chase revenues” with base changes. Equipment requirements can Change fairly frequently on routes
- some DC 9 positions available too. Keeping some of the -40’s until 1st Quarter of 2011- I don’t know how many
- 40 crew schedulers total of which 28 are in their first year
- 330 bases staying where they are now. Possibly change later next year
- Hiring
- 305 this year
- 115-120 total flow ups
- as of 17 jun, 46 furlough bypass have sent in letters to come back
- preferential interviews for guys who had class dates canceled last time
- 2100+ apps in the system
- Project retirements to be about 10% for those 60 and over.
- Shipset jepps for 330 in July and 7ER in Oct.
- 2% capacity growth this year. Close to where we were pre-recession
- Should be 8 SAS MD90 coming. (SAS was what was said) Trying to get more
- Current debt of 16.4Billion. Expect to see that at 15 Billion by end of this year!
Aware now of the extra gas that the 330 seems to be landing with
Disclaimer, These are my interpretations of what was said.
Denny
- Do not anticipate getting any 787’s for 18 to 24 months
- MD 90 qualification for NYC in Fall this year, ATL in Spring of next year
- Next AE Bid in Sep-Oct time frame
- Possible additional 747, 777 crews
- possible a few more 7ER crews in SEA
- SLC to ER category
- status quo for equipment base re-alignment…no equipment moves…..do not Want to “chase revenues” with base changes. Equipment requirements can Change fairly frequently on routes
- some DC 9 positions available too. Keeping some of the -40’s until 1st Quarter of 2011- I don’t know how many
- 40 crew schedulers total of which 28 are in their first year
- 330 bases staying where they are now. Possibly change later next year
- Hiring
- 305 this year
- 115-120 total flow ups
- as of 17 jun, 46 furlough bypass have sent in letters to come back
- preferential interviews for guys who had class dates canceled last time
- 2100+ apps in the system
- Project retirements to be about 10% for those 60 and over.
- Shipset jepps for 330 in July and 7ER in Oct.
- 2% capacity growth this year. Close to where we were pre-recession
- Should be 8 SAS MD90 coming. (SAS was what was said) Trying to get more
- Current debt of 16.4Billion. Expect to see that at 15 Billion by end of this year!
Aware now of the extra gas that the 330 seems to be landing with
Disclaimer, These are my interpretations of what was said.
Denny
Last edited by Denny Crane; 06-18-2010 at 10:57 AM. Reason: added disclaimer!
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 5,113
Likes: 0
The good news: our boys played like they meant it in the second half. I'm tired of seeing the US timidly running around the field, and acting as if there was such a thing as "passing credit". This is the sport the world plays, and it's been frustrating to see us win only in games noone else plays, and holding World Series that don't actually... involve the rest of the world.
Nice job, USA!
Moderator
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,263
Likes: 105
From: DAL 330
I'll have to disagree with you as well. Everywhere you used the word both in bold letters could just as easily have read DAL depending on whose version of cash and cash equivalent position and financials you believe.. But that debate will never be settled.
IMO pilots only have limited opportunities to obtain GREAT leverage. Mergers that management wants, LBOs that want pilot support and strikes. A strike is not a good thing but it's purpose is leverage. LBOs give you short term leverage at the possible expense of long term corporate health. Mergers give leverage depending on the circumstances surrounding them. You and I disagree quite a bit on the circumstances. We'll just have to agree to disagree.
So much for focusing the irritation on management.
IMO pilots only have limited opportunities to obtain GREAT leverage. Mergers that management wants, LBOs that want pilot support and strikes. A strike is not a good thing but it's purpose is leverage. LBOs give you short term leverage at the possible expense of long term corporate health. Mergers give leverage depending on the circumstances surrounding them. You and I disagree quite a bit on the circumstances. We'll just have to agree to disagree.
So much for focusing the irritation on management.
I think Slows post is right on the mark, but from your post I infer that you believe NW was in a much stronger overall position than DAL.
Wasn't that exactly the debate settled by the neutral third party arbitrators when they ruled both companies were essentially "equals?"
In case anyone else is getting tired of rehashing old arguments - how do I get a drop request to appear as Qualified open time?

Scoop
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post




