Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-18-2010, 09:33 AM
  #40881  
Moderator
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
Default

Originally Posted by acl65pilot
GS are generally short notice since they cannot cover them with reserve pilots. Only when you get in to a position where there are no reserves for the next day to you see 12+ hr notification for GS's. It does happen though.

Heck I do not even have one in. I am just going to enjoy the weekend.
Funny thing is they called me for a GS, then IA and then covered it by a WS. Lol.

Hope you do enjoy the weekend. I'm starting 4+ days on tomorrow.
johnso29 is offline  
Old 06-18-2010, 09:35 AM
  #40882  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,539
Default

Originally Posted by Nosmo King
Let me see if I can move some of the irritation in the correct direction, management.

We are complaining quite a bit about "holes" in the contract and things that we should have cherry picked from both PWAs.

They are valid complaints because there are very few times that a pilot group will have that much leverage in a negotiation.
I cannot disagree with you more.

We could have "timed" ourselves into no merger. Remember $147 bbl oil just 4 months after the merger was announced? Remember every major air carrier furloughed pilots (UAL 1450, AMR has over 1800 out, CAL 147, ALA, even the regionals (DCI had over 1000 out). Had AMEX not agreed to the cash infusion, we'd have both been screwed.

That's not a lot of leverage in my book.

So both pre-merger pilot groups could be sitting back wondering when everyone was going to get recalled rather than how many we're going to hire. (The premerger NWA group complaining here wouldn't have been worried about newhires getting more DC than them, they'd be worried about when they were going to get a paycheck again.) Both could be sitting at real bankruptcy pay rates rather than the JCBA rates and 5.6% of the company in their accounts. On the Delta side we'd have opened section 6 in the heart of the airline recession. Great timing...

I'll pass on the leverage that you have to offer. We'll get to see a lot of who's right in the UAUA/CAL dance ahead of us. Merging seniority lists with a disparate number of guys on furlough would have been fun.....
slowplay is offline  
Old 06-18-2010, 09:48 AM
  #40883  
Happy to be here
 
acl65pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Position: A-320A
Posts: 18,563
Default

I have to agree with Slow. The merge created a hype in the financial sector that allowed a large cash infusion as well as great rates on restructuring bad debts in the worst credit markets in history. This mergers allowed all of that "hype" to work to OUR companies advantage. In turn it was good for us. This benefit may not be apparent to many, but it is there.
acl65pilot is offline  
Old 06-18-2010, 10:11 AM
  #40884  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Waves's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2010
Position: SLC 767ER Captain
Posts: 602
Default

Originally Posted by johnso29
I'm DTW so I'm not too sure about SLC, but a CA I was flying with is mid 4K's on system wide seniority and that would hold him a line with weekends/holidays off in MSP. In SLC.......it got him RESERVE.
I'm a little bit more senior than him, but not by a lot. I guess I'll just have to come to terms with being on reserve for the rest of my career. Oh well, I can certainly think of worse things. My question was actually more of an inquiry about the A320 than what I could hold seniority wise. I don't think I have ever set foot in one. Don't know much about the machine. Thanks for your response. I appreciate it.
Waves is offline  
Old 06-18-2010, 10:18 AM
  #40885  
Inventory survival kit ..
 
Nosmo King's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: Seeking no jacket required rotations
Posts: 1,069
Default

Originally Posted by slowplay
I cannot disagree with you more.

We could have "timed" ourselves into no merger. Remember $147 bbl oil just 4 months after the merger was announced? Remember every major air carrier furloughed pilots (UAL 1450, AMR has over 1800 out, CAL 147, ALA, even the regionals (DCI had over 1000 out). Had AMEX not agreed to the cash infusion, we'd have both been screwed.

That's not a lot of leverage in my book.

So both pre-merger pilot groups could be sitting back wondering when everyone was going to get recalled rather than how many we're going to hire. (The premerger NWA group complaining here wouldn't have been worried about newhires getting more DC than them, they'd be worried about when they were going to get a paycheck again.) Both could be sitting at real bankruptcy pay rates rather than the JCBA rates and 5.6% of the company in their accounts. On the Delta side we'd have opened section 6 in the heart of the airline recession. Great timing...

I'll pass on the leverage that you have to offer. We'll get to see a lot of who's right in the UAUA/CAL dance ahead of us. Merging seniority lists with a disparate number of guys on furlough would have been fun.....
I'll have to disagree with you as well. Everywhere you used the word both in bold letters could just as easily have read DAL depending on whose version of cash and cash equivalent position and financials you believe.. But that debate will never be settled.

IMO pilots only have limited opportunities to obtain GREAT leverage. Mergers that management wants, LBOs that want pilot support and strikes. A strike is not a good thing but it's purpose is leverage. LBOs give you short term leverage at the possible expense of long term corporate health. Mergers give leverage depending on the circumstances surrounding them. You and I disagree quite a bit on the circumstances. We'll just have to agree to disagree.

So much for focusing the irritation on management.
Nosmo King is offline  
Old 06-18-2010, 10:41 AM
  #40886  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,539
Default

Originally Posted by Nosmo King
I'll have to disagree with you as well. Everywhere you used the word both in bold letters could just as easily have read DAL depending on whose version of cash and cash equivalent position and financials you believe.. But that debate will never be settled.
No, the debate was settled. We now work for the same company. We needed each other to prosper when everyone else was cutting for survival.

Just a reminder, the cash and cash equivalent for both pre-merger companies was all debt. Both were junk rated companies. So where you write of DAL, you could easily replace it with NWA.


Originally Posted by Nosmo King
So much for focusing the irritation on management.
I reread your post. I didn't see a focus on management. I saw a focus on the JCBA and how it was negotiated (management beat us again...)
slowplay is offline  
Old 06-18-2010, 10:47 AM
  #40887  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Denny Crane's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2008
Position: Kickin’ Back
Posts: 6,971
Default

Well, on a different note, I went to a Fltops management meeting and here are some of the highlights:

- Do not anticipate getting any 787’s for 18 to 24 months
- MD 90 qualification for NYC in Fall this year, ATL in Spring of next year
- Next AE Bid in Sep-Oct time frame
- Possible additional 747, 777 crews
- possible a few more 7ER crews in SEA
- SLC to ER category
- status quo for equipment base re-alignment…no equipment moves…..do not Want to “chase revenues” with base changes. Equipment requirements can Change fairly frequently on routes
- some DC 9 positions available too. Keeping some of the -40’s until 1st Quarter of 2011- I don’t know how many
- 40 crew schedulers total of which 28 are in their first year
- 330 bases staying where they are now. Possibly change later next year
- Hiring
- 305 this year
- 115-120 total flow ups
- as of 17 jun, 46 furlough bypass have sent in letters to come back
- preferential interviews for guys who had class dates canceled last time
- 2100+ apps in the system
- Project retirements to be about 10% for those 60 and over.
- Shipset jepps for 330 in July and 7ER in Oct.
- 2% capacity growth this year. Close to where we were pre-recession
- Should be 8 SAS MD90 coming. (SAS was what was said) Trying to get more
- Current debt of 16.4Billion. Expect to see that at 15 Billion by end of this year!
Aware now of the extra gas that the 330 seems to be landing with


Disclaimer, These are my interpretations of what was said.
Denny

Last edited by Denny Crane; 06-18-2010 at 10:57 AM. Reason: added disclaimer!
Denny Crane is offline  
Old 06-18-2010, 10:47 AM
  #40888  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Posts: 5,113
Default

Originally Posted by buzzpat
Yep. Any idea what that goal was not allowed? Still haven't heard a good reason.
I don't think you'll hear a single good reason. I think there was a very obvious bias. The ref might as well have worn a "Anything but USA" jersey.

The good news: our boys played like they meant it in the second half. I'm tired of seeing the US timidly running around the field, and acting as if there was such a thing as "passing credit". This is the sport the world plays, and it's been frustrating to see us win only in games noone else plays, and holding World Series that don't actually... involve the rest of the world.

Nice job, USA!
Sink r8 is offline  
Old 06-18-2010, 10:52 AM
  #40889  
Moderator
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: DAL 330
Posts: 6,930
Default

Originally Posted by Nosmo King
I'll have to disagree with you as well. Everywhere you used the word both in bold letters could just as easily have read DAL depending on whose version of cash and cash equivalent position and financials you believe.. But that debate will never be settled.

IMO pilots only have limited opportunities to obtain GREAT leverage. Mergers that management wants, LBOs that want pilot support and strikes. A strike is not a good thing but it's purpose is leverage. LBOs give you short term leverage at the possible expense of long term corporate health. Mergers give leverage depending on the circumstances surrounding them. You and I disagree quite a bit on the circumstances. We'll just have to agree to disagree.

So much for focusing the irritation on management.
Nosmo,

I think Slows post is right on the mark, but from your post I infer that you believe NW was in a much stronger overall position than DAL.

Wasn't that exactly the debate settled by the neutral third party arbitrators when they ruled both companies were essentially "equals?"


In case anyone else is getting tired of rehashing old arguments - how do I get a drop request to appear as Qualified open time?

Scoop
Scoop is offline  
Old 06-18-2010, 10:59 AM
  #40890  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Denny Crane's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2008
Position: Kickin’ Back
Posts: 6,971
Default

Originally Posted by Scoop
Nosmo,

I think Slows post is right on the mark, but from your post I infer that you believe NW was in a much stronger overall position than DAL.

Wasn't that exactly the debate settled by the neutral third party arbitrators when they ruled both companies were essentially "equals?"


In case anyone else is getting tired of rehashing old arguments - how do I get a drop request to appear as Qualified open time?

Scoop
Scoop,

You have to post it as a Personal drop via the PCS template.

Denny
Denny Crane is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22594
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices