![]() |
Originally Posted by NuGuy
(Post 858130)
Boy, no kidding.
Judging by the level and nature of complaining about this, it looks like they must have run out of short sleeve shirts at the pilot shop. Nu I'd hardly call it complaining. Frustrated seeing people **** gas away and run engines that don't need to be turning, yes. Why so defensive of waste? |
Originally Posted by opie1
(Post 858135)
Nice justification. You should lobby for age 70 next.
Lighten' up Francis. Did you not see the smiley face at the end of his post? If you didn't know, different aircraft have different missions that preclude them from doing 5 legs a day. Denny |
Originally Posted by JABDIP
(Post 858129)
Us cruisers all put in our time 5 legging it to get to the cruising, kinda like paying your dues.:D
|
Originally Posted by Silver2Gold
(Post 858142)
There there should not be any number under $200 under the column labeled A and similarly, any number below $150 for the 'B' column. And that's referring to the bottom row.
|
Originally Posted by johnso29
(Post 858106)
I don't think he is proposing those pay rates, just trying to stir up ideas on how to make our pay scale less complex.....like a WB/NB scale. FTB will be asking for much higher rates IMO.
Originally Posted by Silver2Gold
(Post 858142)
There should not be any number under $200 under the column labeled A and similarily, any number below $150 for the "B" column. And that's referring to the bottom row.
Originally Posted by hockeypilot44
(Post 857904)
I know a bunch of you, but there are a bunch of you that I still can't put names or faces to.
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_EXopv5BJbn..._eastwood2.jpg I fail to shave often. I measure my days off by my beard. |
Man, I measure my days off by the number of revisions sitting in my box!
|
Originally Posted by Mem9guy
(Post 858126)
I agree that the 747 "should" pay more than the 777, but we already gave that up on our current PWA. Rather than spend negotiating capital on separating them back out, I felt that the 747 as the benchmark for all widebody rates helps to bring all of the others in its category up.
|
Originally Posted by Silver2Gold
(Post 858142)
There should not be any number under $200 under the column labeled A and similarily, any number below $150 for the "B" column. And that's referring to the bottom row.
|
Originally Posted by acl65pilot
(Post 858147)
Man, I measure my days off by the number of revisions sitting in my box!
|
Originally Posted by Silver2Gold
(Post 858142)
There should not be any number under $200 under the column labeled A and similarily, any number below $150 for the "B" column. And that's referring to the bottom row.
WORD! |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:51 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands