![]() |
Originally Posted by johnso29
(Post 863556)
AE today???? Anyone??? Anyone???
|
Originally Posted by 1234
(Post 863566)
Sure is nice to see the 30 new names on the category list under NBC / NEW / B PILOTS! Keep em coming......
|
Originally Posted by Gunfighter
(Post 863589)
It's too early for that much anticipation. Wait at least a week before starting the hourly refresh of the Flight Ops page.
|
Originally Posted by redblueskies
(Post 863590)
I think this is the first month since the merger I haven't moved up a single number due to a retirement or whatever, so that makes them even more welcome. Let's keep the relative seniority increasing one way or another. Looks like a minimum of 54 new people added to the list.
|
For you contract interpreters out there.........If you have a certain HR executive vice president say (As part of a statement about union vs nonunion compensation): In addition, he says, Delta already plans to raise salaries, an expense accounted for in future estimates. "We've already built into our models that we will be at or above the industry standard for pay and benefits," XXXXXXXX says. "And we are bringing everyone up to that level by Oct. 1."
I'm assuming this will be for the non-union workforce which, in my estimation, could trigger a section in our contract that deals with 30% of the non-union workforce getting a raise. (Look at Section 3 after the Pay Tables.) If this is the case and the review is triggered, which American and Continental pay rates would be used? American has seperate rates for the the 767 and 757. Continental has widebody vs long narrowbody rates. Our rates for the two are the same........ Granted, we probably would not see anything unless the "New United" JCBA has significant gains in pay, but it is an 18 month window so it could be possible. Any thoughts? Denny |
Originally Posted by rahc
(Post 863558)
http://www.airlinepilotforums.com/im...cons/icon1.gif
Actually here's the 2009 attendance for the NCAA (Big 10 teams in red) Big Ten 1,2,3. And the next 3 Big Ten teams (Wisconsin, Iowa, Mich St) would be much higher on the list if their stadium capacity allowed it. They sell out pretty much every game. Gotta admit however, the same could be said of several SEC teams. Every game a sell out. |
Originally Posted by Pineapple Guy
(Post 863592)
The category list uses the current month's seniority numbers (I.E. it shows Sep categories using Aug seniority numbers). Look for a September seniority list out in a few days. You'll probably move up a few after all!
|
Originally Posted by Check Essential
(Post 863619)
Interesting stats.
Big Ten 1,2,3. And the next 3 Big Ten teams (Wisconsin, Iowa, Mich St) would be much higher on the list if their stadium capacity allowed it. They sell out pretty much every game. Gotta admit however, the same could be said of several SEC teams. Every game a sell out. South Carolina Grad and Fan |
Originally Posted by Denny Crane
(Post 863612)
For you contract interpreters out there.........If you have a certain HR executive vice president say (As part of a statement about union vs nonunion compensation): In addition, he says, Delta already plans to raise salaries, an expense accounted for in future estimates. "We've already built into our models that we will be at or above the industry standard for pay and benefits," XXXXXXXX says. "And we are bringing everyone up to that level by Oct. 1."
I'm assuming this will be for the non-union workforce which, in my estimation, could trigger a section in our contract that deals with 30% of the non-union workforce getting a raise. (Look at Section 3 after the Pay Tables.) If this is the case and the review is triggered, which American and Continental pay rates would be used? American has seperate rates for the the 767 and 757. Continental has widebody vs long narrowbody rates. Our rates for the two are the same........ Granted, we probably would not see anything unless the "New United" JCBA has significant gains in pay, but it is an 18 month window so it could be possible. Any thoughts? Denny I'm no lawyer, but that seems pretty clear to me. ;) |
Originally Posted by Denny Crane
(Post 863612)
For you contract interpreters out there.........If you have a certain HR executive vice president say (As part of a statement about union vs nonunion compensation): In addition, he says, Delta already plans to raise salaries, an expense accounted for in future estimates. "We've already built into our models that we will be at or above the industry standard for pay and benefits," XXXXXXXX says. "And we are bringing everyone up to that level by Oct. 1."
I'm assuming this will be for the non-union workforce which, in my estimation, could trigger a section in our contract that deals with 30% of the non-union workforce getting a raise. (Look at Section 3 after the Pay Tables.) If this is the case and the review is triggered, which American and Continental pay rates would be used? American has seperate rates for the the 767 and 757. Continental has widebody vs long narrowbody rates. Our rates for the two are the same........ Granted, we probably would not see anything unless the "New United" JCBA has significant gains in pay, but it is an 18 month window so it could be possible. Any thoughts? Denny DL : 175 AMR : 174 CO : 169 UA : 159 US : 144 Average of other 4 is 161.50. We would need some big gains by CO/UA to bring up the average. Interesting question is whether after the merger, the CO/UA rate will be counted once in the average with three carriers, or twice in the average with four carriers. We get another 4% in Jan 2011 and Jan 2012 so that will require even bigger gains by CO/UA. Here's to hoping. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:36 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands