![]() |
Originally Posted by Splash
(Post 872370)
Carl has done well this Summer. So have I.
Carl |
Originally Posted by DALMD88FO
(Post 872416)
I see all this sniveling about how bad the contract here is a DAL, however it was voted in by a landslide on the fNWA side of the house.
Others post factually incorrect things about the fNWA contract. I refute it. They say, prove it. I prove it with the actual data. You call it sniveling. If you have no other capability but to wrongly interpret what's going on around you, maybe you should try to improve on that before you post. Carl |
I do not know why we continue these pointless arguments. Both DAL and WA were in BK contracts that were less then stellar. If it was not for the merger neither pilot group would have received any raises, i.e. LOA 19 for fDAL and the JCBA for NWA.
fDAL would be in contract talks now, granted a good time for it and fNWA would be waiting another year. Would either or both carriers have furloughed last year? Would either have hired? The answer is no one knows and to look back and getting into these ****ing contests is worthless. I had a fDAL pilot in the crew room the other day tell me that fNWA pilots should get less in profit sharing because we got a bigger raise. We talked about it for a bit in a rationale non internet sort of way. At the end we both decided that we were better of together in the long run in a merger. Especially considering the other dance partners. |
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 872449)
Carl, I got the no raises and long duration straight from a NWA pilot.
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 872064)
The other thing Carl did not mention was the long length of the NWA contract with zero raises.
When I make a mistake, I say so. I don't make excuses and blame a "DAL pilot" for the bad data. Carl |
Here is an idea lifted from the fNW contract.
Take the blockholder without a block language and apply it to DL reserves using SC and LC. SC eligible gets 75 hours guarantee. LC only (no SC) 68 hour guarantee (insert your version of guarantee here). Would obviously have to be some language about minimum number of people required to be eligible for SC blah blah... There would be other considerations as well, I'm just not going to list them all here since its a hypothetical. |
Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
(Post 872501)
This is my biggest complaint about you/slowplay.''' Care to point out the examples of your "complaint," or do those of your ilk prefer to just drive by...? |
Originally Posted by slowplay
(Post 872535)
There you go again, Carl. Jackson Pollock would be proud of your painting style. By the way, you need a new drop cloth.:p
Originally Posted by slowplay
(Post 872535)
Care to point out the examples of your "complaint," or do those of your ilk prefer to just drive by...?
Originally Posted by slowplay
(Post 868816)
Hey, I know you're on MH's e-mail list. Maybe you can explain "operation tidy-bowl"
This is an example of what I mean when I say that you make things up. Carl |
Originally Posted by dlpilot
(Post 872452)
enough with all the fnwa and fdal talk. Stop living in the past and focus on the future. We are one company now. Put the focus on improving what we have now.
|
Yeah Baby!
Originally Posted by newKnow
(Post 872401)
80,
You are too young to even know what that is. I used to kick but on Space Invaders. My favorite though: Zaxxon. |
Originally Posted by DLpilot
(Post 872452)
Enough with all the FNWA and FDAL talk. Stop living in the past and focus on the future. We are ONE company now. Put the focus on improving what we have now.
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_5FP_NXXHsI...rinAndrews.jpg :D |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:38 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands