![]() |
Originally Posted by clipperskipper
(Post 888103)
Still looking for room 1624...sink r8 writes "Never mind the fact that crash had little to do with fatigue" I beg to argue this one as it is always that uninterrupted chain of events, with no intervening variable that produces the accident. Calling for flaps five, the F/O replied "what"? Sure the Captain allegedly made an error, and there was nobody there to help him.
I think that HR needs to change applications to read must be willing to relocate, and then again as we merge and close crew bases. YouTube - Colgan 3407 NTSB Animation with Sound When you say the Captain "allegedly" made an error, what exactly do you mean? The Captain crashed the plane, independently of the fact the F/O was also trying to help him crash the plane. Look at the speed tape (which reflects stall speed for existing flap settings, not the settings he wished for), look at the power levers, and look at the elevator and aileron inputs throughout this sad evolution. IOW, he F/O was trying very hard for a Best Supporting Actress Oscar in this horror movie, but he was notnethelss the lead actor, and the director. Considering his actions in the years prior, and his (alleged) falsifications of records, I'd say he wrote the script too. I stand by my assertion: this accident had little to do with fatigue. You're mistakenly assuming that even if she had rolled out of bed all nice and fresh, she would have the skills and experience to overcome his desperate attempts to crash the thing. Looking at her act of retracting the flaps, even once the adrenalin flowed... I just don't see it. In other words, her being tired was not the accident link that needed to be broken, her presence and was the accident link. |
Originally Posted by NWA320pilot
(Post 888124)
I think the bigger issue is the government shouldn't butt into our personal lives. Uncle Sam has no right to dictate where anyone should live.
Carl |
Originally Posted by NWA320pilot
(Post 888124)
I think the bigger issue is the government shouldn't butt into our personal lives. Uncle Sam has no right to dictate where anyone should live.
The NPRM language is incorrectly skewed by the 3407 lobby, based on a non-related case, but the refernces to commuting are nonetheless present in the text. With Pandora's box opened, I think there is no way you successfully argue that anything that happens before you fly is only your business. If it were so, there would also be no alcohol regs. Again, I'm not arguing any of this is good, and I disagree with the inclusion of the language, but it seems to me the most logical solution that might then work for all parties would be for pilots to be affored an option to pick up trips close to home. This isn't a case of advocating for something on my part: I prefer driving to my junior, big base, and I have no incentive to see the flying shift to satellite bases. |
Originally Posted by Sink r8
(Post 888144)
Except the NPRM doesn't tell you where you have to live, only that you have to be rested and fit for duty. What you suggest may be a big issue, but it's not the relevant issue in this case.
The NPRM language is incorrectly skewed by the 3407 lobby, based on a non-related case, but the refernces to commuting are nonetheless present in the text. With Pandora's box opened, I think there is no way you successfully argue that anything that happens before you fly is only your business. If it were so, there would also be no alcohol regs. Again, I'm not arguing any of this is good, and I disagree with the inclusion of the language, but it seems to me the most logical solution that might then work for all parties would be for pilots to be affored an option to pick up trips close to home. This isn't a case of advocating for something on my part: I prefer driving to my junior, big base, and I have no incentive to see the flying shift to satellite bases. ...+1... Chuck |
Originally Posted by DALMD88FO
(Post 888066)
How funny? Commuting is a choice. Here is a list of former Delta bases that I can remember, not to mention the cutting at bases we currently still have.
BOS MCO MSY DFW ORD MIA PDX I'm sure other Delta guys can add on. So it's real easy to say commuting is a choice, however, unless you move to ATL you are always in the crosshairs at Delta. Then the same people that complained that commuting is a choice would cry when they get bumped back to reserve because everyone moved into their base. |
What is up with this?
19 folks have got up and walked out of training recently and that of the 19 there are 4 lawsuits filed so far. These numbers are the best info available to someone (coming off of furlough bypass) I know that did in fact get up and walk out at ATL. |
Originally Posted by clipperskipper
(Post 888103)
I think that HR needs to change applications to read must be willing to relocate, and then again as we merge and close crew bases.
This is me giving you a real ugly look, setting my beer quietly on the bar and walking away.:mad: |
Originally Posted by texavia
(Post 888163)
What is up with this?
19 folks have got up and walked out of training recently and that of the 19 there are 4 lawsuits filed so far. These numbers are the best info available to someone I know that did in fact get up and walk out. Why did said person get up and walk out? There's a lot of info missing from this statement. |
There would be a lot of unhappy people in Dallas. Most pretty senior.
Even some CPs commute. What about the FA me too clause? Maybe they should be forced to live in base too. They need to be rested to perform emergency duties. |
Originally Posted by texavia
(Post 888163)
What is up with this?
19 folks have got up and walked out of training recently and that of the 19 there are 4 lawsuits filed so far. These numbers are the best info available to someone I know that did in fact get up and walk out. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:53 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands