Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Delta (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/)
-   -   Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/36912-any-latest-greatest-about-delta.html)

FrankCobretti 10-21-2010 07:48 AM

Benefits update question:

Is the Health Care Savings Plan compatible with Tricare Reserve Select?

DALMD88FO 10-21-2010 08:07 AM

How funny? Commuting is a choice. Here is a list of former Delta bases that I can remember, not to mention the cutting at bases we currently still have.

BOS
MCO
MSY
DFW
ORD
MIA
PDX

I'm sure other Delta guys can add on. So it's real easy to say commuting is a choice, however, unless you move to ATL you are always in the crosshairs at Delta. Then the same people that complained that commuting is a choice would cry when they get bumped back to reserve because everyone moved into their base.

slowplay 10-21-2010 08:11 AM


Originally Posted by FrankCobretti (Post 888052)
Benefits update question:

Is the Health Care Savings Plan compatible with Tricare Reserve Select?

You need to clarify your question, but this is what I remember.

If you're asking about Flexible Spending accounts(FSA), then yes, they can coordinate benefits. If you're asking about Health Savings accounts (HSA), then no, they can't coordinate. To use an HSA your only coverage can be a high deductible plan, and TriCare isn't one of those. Call ALPA R&I to get the real info.

forgot to bid 10-21-2010 08:23 AM

How come airline pilots can answer this question:

29. (Refer to appendix 2, figures 237, 238A, 239C, 231, 254 and 281B.) Given the following conditions, what are the takeoff V speeds?
Weight: 170,000 lb.
Flaps: 10°
Temperature (OAT): 25° C
Field pressure altitude: 427 ft.
Runway slope: 0%
Wind (KTS) Headwind: 8 KTS
Runway Condition: Wet Runway
For VR more than or equal to .1 VR, round up VR to the next value (example: 140 +.1 =141)

A. V1 134 kts., VR 140 kts., V2 145 kts.
B. V1 140 kts., VR 140 kts., V2 145 kts.
C. V1 138 kts., VR 141 kts., V2 145 kts.


But not this one?

Where is room 1631? Left or right?

http://i938.photobucket.com/albums/a...g?t=1287678022

Sink r8 10-21-2010 08:25 AM

Why don't we simply avoid the "commuting is a choice" debate? We've had it before.

If you look at things from a dispassionate and pragmatic standpoint, you've got a NPRM that is not compatible with the current contract. It will be the catalyst to sit down and re-negotiate Section 23. You've also got language that make the company jointly responsible for examining individual commuting practices, and jointly responsible for ensuring the pilot is rested. And you've got language that would make commuting time not count as rest. And you've got acclimation issues on which duty time and flight time are based. If everyone on the crew is not acclimated the same... they can't fly the same flight time and duty day.

How on earth do they make this work?

Option A: they require the pilot to come in to the base for a pre-trip rest. Option B: they try to reduce commuting. Option A implies costs. I don't think our contract allows for free rest periods before a rotation, therefore it would have to be built into the rotation. I also don't think the contract allows the company to force anyone to live anywhere particular. So you're down to B.

The only effective way to avoid commuting is to let the flying originate near the pilot. I'm not anywhere as smart as, say, Carl (noone is), but it seems reasonable to conclude that there will be a huge incentive for the company to put satellite basing on the table, like never before. I would bet the next contract offers dozens (and dozens) of cities, so that almost anyone can drive to any such city in two hours. I don't think this ends up costing any negotiating capital, because this is all about the impact of the new rules, and the effective lobbying by the family of Colgan 3407 victims. Never mind the fact that crash had little to do with fatigue, and almost everything to do with stupid pilots and poor flying skills: FOX and CNN decided it was a fatigue issue... and so it was.

For the record, I'm not a commuter, and I prefer big bases. But this strikes me as the obvious way out of the new regs, assuming they don't end up being changed. If anyone else has a alternative (and rational) vision of the future, I'm open to it. This is just where my speculation leads.

NWA320pilot 10-21-2010 08:47 AM


Originally Posted by Sink r8 (Post 887963)
What letter?



Sorry I guess letter was the incorrect verbage..... It was actually in a council 20 update:

"Inappropriate Materials and Graffiti On Aircraft
Inappropriate material and graffiti have recently been discovered on some aircraft. If you discover any of these materials during preflight, please remove and discard them and in the case of graffiti, make a logbook entry so that maintenance can remove it."

Sink r8 10-21-2010 08:54 AM


Originally Posted by NWA320pilot (Post 888095)
Sorry I guess letter was the incorrect verbage..... It was actually in a council 20 update:

"Inappropriate Materials and Graffiti On Aircraft
Inappropriate material and graffiti have recently been discovered on some aircraft. If you discover any of these materials during preflight, please remove and discard them and in the case of graffiti, make a logbook entry so that maintenance can remove it."

OK, thanks.

clipperskipper 10-21-2010 09:05 AM

Still looking for room 1624...sink r8 writes "Never mind the fact that crash had little to do with fatigue" I beg to argue this one as it is always that uninterrupted chain of events, with no intervening variable that produces the accident. Calling for flaps five, the F/O replied "what"? Sure the Captain allegedly made an error, and there was nobody there to help him.

I think that HR needs to change applications to read must be willing to relocate, and then again as we merge and close crew bases.

johnso29 10-21-2010 09:18 AM

If the company wants to eliminate commuting then the will pay COLA. A guy can not live as nicely in the NYC are on the same pay as a guy living in the DTW area. I think airlines will fight rules that eliminate commuting, because not allowing commuting will cost them $$$.

NWA320pilot 10-21-2010 09:32 AM


Originally Posted by johnso29 (Post 888111)
If the company wants to eliminate commuting then the will pay COLA. A guy can not live as nicely in the NYC are on the same pay as a guy living in the DTW area. I think airlines will fight rules that eliminate commuting, because not allowing commuting will cost them $$$.

I think the bigger issue is the government shouldn't butt into our personal lives. Uncle Sam has no right to dictate where anyone should live.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:52 PM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands