Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Delta (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/)
-   -   Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/36912-any-latest-greatest-about-delta.html)

Desperado 01-08-2010 06:40 AM


Originally Posted by Ferd149 (Post 740384)
Des,

With NWAf16dude, Cogf16 and I think we have a quorum! Tightonka it is:cool:

Hey, I'm try'en to get out to SGN before it goes away.........any intel;)

Ferd

My own callsign....snif

I'm so happy:D


TIGHTONKA

Razor 01-08-2010 06:44 AM

Not good numbers coming out about Delta's performance. The stock price is nice however.


Delta Air Lines Inc.'s (DAL) passenger traffic continued to weaken in December as the carrier's underperformance relative to peers continued.

Many U.S. airlines have cut capacity to cope with a decline in both business and leisure travel. A handful of U.S. airlines, including low-cost carrier AirTran Airways, a unit of Air Tran Holdings Inc. (AAI), and Continental Airlines Inc. (CAL) reported this week that their traffic rose in December from a year earlier, as they continued to claw back from last summer's nadir, when many were reporting double-digit-percentage declines.

But not everyone landed in positive territory, with AMR Corp.'s (AMR) American Airlines and US Airways Group Inc. (LCC) also reporting that traffic fell.

Delta, the world's largest carrier, reported Thursday that traffic levels were down 7.5% amid an 8% drop in capacity. Just over a year ago, Delta completed its acquisition of Northwest Airlines. The percentage of seats filled at Delta rose 0.4 percentage point in December to 81.2%.

In the U.S., traffic fell 6.3%, as capacity contracted 4% and as so-called load factor fell 2 percentage points to 80.2%. International traffic fell 9.3% amid a deeper 14% drop in capacity, allowing load factor to increase 4.2 points to 82.9%.

Delta shares were up 5% at $12.72 in recent trading amid a rally for airline stocks, which were reacting in part to a pause to crude oil's recent gains.


-By Tess Stynes, Dow Jones Newswires


Delta, Comair on-time rates soar
Business Courier of Cincinnati

Delta Air Lines and its Comair subsidiary greatly improved their on-time rates in November – but so did most other airlines, according to the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Air Travel Consumer Report.

The major carriers overall reported an average on-time rate of 88.6 percent in November, the highest since the DOT began compiling statistics in 1995.

Delta posted a December on-time rate of 87.4 percent, up from 79.4 percent in October, but its ranking among the 19 major airlines fell to 13th from sixth. Comair improved its rate to 86.2 percent from 75.1 percent, and dropped one notch in the ranking, to 16th.

The Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky International Airport had a November on-time arrival rate of 91 percent and an on-time departure rate of 89.1 percent. That compares with an on-time arrival rate of 84.4 percent, and an on-time departure rate of 86.4 percent.

Delta boosted its performance in the mishandled baggage category, to 3.51 reports per 1,000 passengers, versus 4.4 reports in October, but fell to 15th from 14th in the ranking. Comair fell to 17th from 16th, with 3.82 reports per 1,000 passengers, compared to 5.08 the month before.

Delta retained its last-place ranking for consumer complaints, with 1.79 per 100,000 enplanements, up from 1.7 in October. Comair moved up to sixth place from 14th, with 0.42 complaints per 100,000 enplanements, compared to 0.92 the previous month.

Atlanta-based Delta (NYSE: DAL) operates a hub at the Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky International Airport. Comair is based in Erlanger.

Ferd149 01-08-2010 06:58 AM


Originally Posted by Razor (Post 740388)

Delta, the world's largest carrier, reported Thursday that traffic levels were down 7.5% amid an 8% drop in capacity. The percentage of seats filled at Delta rose 0.4 percentage point in December to 81.2%.

In the U.S., traffic fell 6.3%, as capacity contracted 4% and as so-called load factor fell 2 percentage points to 80.2%. International traffic fell 9.3% amid a deeper 14% drop in capacity, allowing load factor to increase 4.2 points to 82.9%.

Delta shares were up 5% at $12.72 in recent trading amid a rally for airline stocks, which were reacting in part to a pause to crude oil's recent gains.

And we see the master plan. Load factor is up and traffic is down (7.5) less than or almost equal to what we pulled out of the system (8%). Overall our drop (7.5%) greater than the national (6.3%) so still some fat to cut? Maybe where they are getting the RJ cuts?

If we really are undermanned for the summer, this may be the cutting in preparation? It will be interesting to see what revenue was for the holiday seasons.

Ferd

Tomcat 01-08-2010 06:59 AM


Originally Posted by satchip (Post 740223)
ALABAMA NATIONAL CHAMPIONS!!!! GOT 13?

Let me first say that Texas played a heck of a game. That freshman qb is going to be something. The way he gathered himself in the second half to bring them back is just amazing. That defense was also stellar for Texas. If not for Bama's end of the half interception return this could be a different story. Congrats to Super and all the UT fans (among whom I live) for a great season.

ROLL DAMN TIDE!!!!

Roll Tide!!!! Congratulations satchip!!! I was pulling hard for Bama last night. Great to see you guys have such a year. Makes me think of the Bear. Bama is going to be even tougher next year! See you in Tuscaloosa Oct 2!

Go Gators!

TC

Ferd149 01-08-2010 07:01 AM


Originally Posted by Desperado (Post 740387)
My own callsign....snif

I'm so happy:D


TIGHTONKA

Argggggg and to the bar boys in honor of Tightonka!!:D Whiskey for my horses, water for my friends.

Desperado 01-08-2010 07:17 AM


Originally Posted by Ferd149 (Post 740396)
Argggggg and to the bar boys in honor of Tightonka!!:D Whiskey for my horses, water for my friends.


Well, actually, I was just looking for something to use while making inane PA's.:rolleyes:

KC10 FATboy 01-08-2010 07:40 AM


Originally Posted by Razor (Post 740388)
Not good numbers coming out about Delta's performance. The stock price is nice however.


Delta Air Lines Inc.'s (DAL) passenger traffic continued to weaken in December as the carrier's underperformance relative to peers continued.

Many U.S. airlines have cut capacity to cope with a decline in both business and leisure travel. A handful of U.S. airlines, including low-cost carrier AirTran Airways, a unit of Air Tran Holdings Inc. (AAI), and Continental Airlines Inc. (CAL) reported this week that their traffic rose in December from a year earlier, as they continued to claw back from last summer's nadir, when many were reporting double-digit-percentage declines.

But not everyone landed in positive territory, with AMR Corp.'s (AMR) American Airlines and US Airways Group Inc. (LCC) also reporting that traffic fell.

Delta, the world's largest carrier, reported Thursday that traffic levels were down 7.5% amid an 8% drop in capacity. Just over a year ago, Delta completed its acquisition of Northwest Airlines. The percentage of seats filled at Delta rose 0.4 percentage point in December to 81.2%.

In the U.S., traffic fell 6.3%, as capacity contracted 4% and as so-called load factor fell 2 percentage points to 80.2%. International traffic fell 9.3% amid a deeper 14% drop in capacity, allowing load factor to increase 4.2 points to 82.9%.

Delta shares were up 5% at $12.72 in recent trading amid a rally for airline stocks, which were reacting in part to a pause to crude oil's recent gains.


-By Tess Stynes, Dow Jones Newswires


Delta, Comair on-time rates soar
Business Courier of Cincinnati

Delta Air Lines and its Comair subsidiary greatly improved their on-time rates in November – but so did most other airlines, according to the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Air Travel Consumer Report.

The major carriers overall reported an average on-time rate of 88.6 percent in November, the highest since the DOT began compiling statistics in 1995.

Delta posted a December on-time rate of 87.4 percent, up from 79.4 percent in October, but its ranking among the 19 major airlines fell to 13th from sixth. Comair improved its rate to 86.2 percent from 75.1 percent, and dropped one notch in the ranking, to 16th.

The Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky International Airport had a November on-time arrival rate of 91 percent and an on-time departure rate of 89.1 percent. That compares with an on-time arrival rate of 84.4 percent, and an on-time departure rate of 86.4 percent.

Delta boosted its performance in the mishandled baggage category, to 3.51 reports per 1,000 passengers, versus 4.4 reports in October, but fell to 15th from 14th in the ranking. Comair fell to 17th from 16th, with 3.82 reports per 1,000 passengers, compared to 5.08 the month before.

Delta retained its last-place ranking for consumer complaints, with 1.79 per 100,000 enplanements, up from 1.7 in October. Comair moved up to sixth place from 14th, with 0.42 complaints per 100,000 enplanements, compared to 0.92 the previous month.

Atlanta-based Delta (NYSE: DAL) operates a hub at the Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky International Airport. Comair is based in Erlanger.

Why does this not surprise me? They really need to fix this crap or we aren't going to be the world's largest carrier for long. :mad:

Wasatch Phantom 01-08-2010 07:42 AM

Folks you heard it here (from Wasatch Phantom) first:

It's now 2010 and this year (and only this year) you can, without regard to income levels, convert your deductible and non deductible IRA's to Roth IRA's.

Consult your tax professionals.

This is a one time good deal!

Fishfreighter 01-08-2010 08:00 AM


Originally Posted by forgot to bid (Post 739783)
But fwiw, that Alaska-DAL agreement is a big sore spot for our west coast pilots. Many see it as a reason for displacements out of LAX with no pending growth.

And that is an entirely reasonable concern. Because what is a code-share but just another outsourcing of flying? But, when you hear these guys talk:


Originally Posted by Cogf16 (Post 740084)
So an AS pilot who has a 737 life ahead of him should have access to all the WB's at Delta? Are you crazy? And I believe career expectations have been a basic tenet of SLI's for years, and especially now!


Originally Posted by sinca3 (Post 740150)
+1...I totally agree!! I am not biased toward AS what so ever, but I along with EVERYONE at DAL have expectations. Allowing someone from a merged/acquired airline to slow my or any DAL pilot expectations is wrong.

...is it any wonder why the average Alaska pilot has ZERO desire to become the redheaded stepchild of the DAL seniority list? If there is a merger, we all become part of the same team and discriminating against a group of your team only engenders conflict. Ask some of your Delta North brothers how the red book/green book stuff worked out.

And the "I only applied to DAL to fly international widebodies" is a bunch of hooey and we all know it. If DAL hadn't been hiring at the time YOU would have gratefully come to Alaska to get out of your RJ. So give us a break.

Launchpad475 01-08-2010 08:08 AM

Why is everyone so hell bent on DAL buying or merging with AS anyways? I feel like I'm in a time warp, all this same talk was going on in 01 when I got hired.

Someone is always buying AS for their west coast stuff, just never seems to happen.

Bucking Bar 01-08-2010 08:19 AM


Originally Posted by Fishfreighter (Post 740429)
... . YOU would have gratefully come to Alaska to get out of your RJ. So give us a break.

Yes, Alaska actually brings good stuff to the table relative to its size. The problem for an Alaska merger is that it comes after the NWA merger, fleet rationalization and displacements which are proving painful.

Not that you have to be understanding, but do understand that the pain of the NWA merger is just starting to be felt and some are going to spout off at you because they feel they got screwed two years ago. Make any sense? No, not really. But that is how it is.

E1Out 01-08-2010 08:23 AM


Originally Posted by Fishfreighter (Post 740429)
And the "I only applied to DAL to fly international widebodies" is a bunch of hooey and we all know it. If DAL hadn't been hiring at the time YOU would have gratefully come to Alaska to get out of your RJ. So give us a break.

FF - I can only speak for myself, but at least as far as I'm concerned, I'm going to respectfully disagree with you. Each person's situation is different. Believe it or not, I loved the regional I was at before I came to Delta. I was making good money (more than I'm making now, in fact), I was in the top 30% of the seniority list, I was flying all over North America (I haven't yet made it West of the Mississippi at Delta), and I had a lot of friends there. For many years, I considered staying there - in fact, MANY of my coworkers turned down a flow-through to a WB Intl Major and stayed at my previous regional. I decided that it was my long held dream to fly WB International, so I left and came to Delta.

I grew up on the East Coast, and I plan to stay on the East Coast. I have never had any desire to commute to work. I have no doubt that Alaska is a wonderful company and a great place to work - I've heard terrific things about it. But I didn't apply there, nor would I ever have applied to Alaska, simply because they didn't offer what I was looking for - a NYC base and WB Intl flying. I'm not speaking for everyone - but my situation is not "hooey."



...is it any wonder why the average Alaska pilot has ZERO desire to become the redheaded stepchild of the DAL seniority list? If there is a merger, we all become part of the same team and discriminating against a group of your team only engenders conflict. Ask some of your Delta North brothers how the red book/green book stuff worked out.
I'm sorry if my post - or any of my fellow coworkers' posts - have made you feel like we would view any Alaska pilot as a redheaded stepchild. That is certainly not my feeling or intent. I agree with you that we would be working as one team - and I would be happy and welcoming of the opportunity. But just as many of us would like to fence some of our WB Intl flying for a time, Delta has a lot of West Coast based pilots that I'm sure would be MORE than happy to jump on Alaska's LAX and SEA bases as well as those Maui overnights at the first opportunity. :) All I'm simply saying, is that there ought to be some fences protecting each pilot group - NOT lifetime fences, or even 20 year fences like NWA had - just 5 to 10 years like what DAL/NWA did with the 777 and 747, but perhaps extended to the 7ER, 765, etc. I would also fight for an Alaska fence, to protect that flying from us as well. I can't imagine that the junior Alaska pilots would enjoy being displaced to the Maddog out of NYC. Heck, most of our own pilots don't even want it! :D

Eric Stratton 01-08-2010 08:39 AM

E1Out,

How many Dal south guys were bumped out of a WB seat by Dal north pilots on your last bid? Was the migration to ATL as bad as some projected? I'm just curious how things turned out.

Gnewt 01-08-2010 08:46 AM


Originally Posted by Desperado (Post 740387)
My own callsign....snif

I'm so happy:D


TIGHTONKA

Can we call him "Tight" or "Tonka" for short? If you know Des, either one of those might be even better that the original!

Eye of....

Dirtdiver 01-08-2010 08:47 AM


Originally Posted by Eric Stratton (Post 740451)
E1Out,

How many Dal south guys were bumped out of a WB seat by Dal north pilots on your last bid? Was the migration to ATL as bad as some projected? I'm just curious how things turned out.



Lost my "vente" WB seat for a "grande". It had more to do with moving half my category to NY, but the N guys that slid in may have made the difference in hanging on as the plug.

slowplay 01-08-2010 09:05 AM


Originally Posted by Bucking Bar (Post 740437)
Yes, Alaska actually brings good stuff to the table relative to its size. The problem for an Alaska merger is that it comes after the NWA merger, fleet rationalization and displacements which are proving painful.

Not that you have to be understanding, but do understand that the pain of the NWA merger is just starting to be felt and some are going to spout off at you because they feel they got screwed two years ago. Make any sense? No, not really. But that is how it is.

It makes no sense at all, and those "entitlement" mentality guys need to get over themselves, imo.

"Pain of the NWA merger"....right.:rolleyes:

Imagine where you would have been without $2 billion in Amex cash, $700 million in synergies (half of which was duplicate management elimination), route and currency diversification, and an increased revenue premium to the industry (though still not where it should be vis a vis our competitors). You think you would have survived without "pain" as a new hire at a standalone Delta or NWA with a 45% drop in revenue during the summer of 2009? How about with oil at $140 the year before. H1N1? Japan Open Skies? Not likely.

I personally am tired of the whining. I'm tired of the entitlement mentality. I'm tired of the ignorance and revision of history. Not that you have to be understanding of my fatigue, but I challenge some here to look in the mirror and see if they see a reflection of reality. "I got screwed..."
Yeah, right...:mad: Your butt got saved, and that's both premerger groups.

slowplay 01-08-2010 09:10 AM


Originally Posted by Eric Stratton (Post 740451)
E1Out,

How many Dal south guys were bumped out of a WB seat by Dal north pilots on your last bid? Was the migration to ATL as bad as some projected? I'm just curious how things turned out.

If you're looking at pure north/south moves (meaning base AND equipment, not SLC M88 to MSP M88 or MSP 320 to SLC 320), then there were 228 South pilots that moved to North bases and equipment and 227 North pilots that moved to South bases and equipment. There will be a slight change to these numbers when the bid error for frozen categories is finally corrected (approximately 20 guys, with about 60 trickle downs), but it shouldn't change the ratio substantially.

The seniority list worked as a seniority list should.

Model Citezen 01-08-2010 09:19 AM


Originally Posted by slowplay (Post 740466)

Imagine where you would have been without $2 billion in Amex cash, $700 million in synergies (half of which was duplicate management elimination), route and currency diversification, and an increased revenue premium to the industry (though still not where it should be vis a vis our competitors). You think you would have survived without "pain" as a new hire at a standalone Delta or NWA with a 45% drop in revenue during the summer of 2009?

Slo,
I believe we went from a 30 Billion dollar company to 24 billion during 2009..... that about a 20% drop in revenue (not 45%). The Amex deal is to provide 2 Billion over the course of the contract. We got a check for 1 Billion at the start of 2009. We should have another 500 million this year and 500 million next year. Although we might have experienced a "short term" 45% downturn, the worst financial numbers I have read about show a 25% drop over the summer quarter and we are ending the year off just about 20% for 2009. I am not picking on you, just want to make sure facts and figures don't start becoming urban legends.

alfaromeo 01-08-2010 09:34 AM


Originally Posted by Fishfreighter (Post 740429)
And that is an entirely reasonable concern. Because what is a code-share but just another outsourcing of flying? But, when you hear these guys talk:

...is it any wonder why the average Alaska pilot has ZERO desire to become the redheaded stepchild of the DAL seniority list? If there is a merger, we all become part of the same team and discriminating against a group of your team only engenders conflict. Ask some of your Delta North brothers how the red book/green book stuff worked out.

And the "I only applied to DAL to fly international widebodies" is a bunch of hooey and we all know it. If DAL hadn't been hiring at the time YOU would have gratefully come to Alaska to get out of your RJ. So give us a break.

Just remember, that there are maybe 15 or 20 guys on this board out of 12000+ Delta pilots. They are in no way representative of the entire group. I have no idea whether we will merge or not, but if we do you will be treated fairly and welcomed into the company. While every merger involves drama, Delta has a history of less than normal drama. Alaska is a great company and Delta would be stronger if we merged. I do think this merger talk is WAY WAY premature.

alfaromeo 01-08-2010 09:39 AM


Originally Posted by Model Citezen (Post 740478)
Slo,
I believe we went from a 30 Billion dollar company to 24 billion during 2009..... that about a 20% drop in revenue (not 45%). The Amex deal is to provide 2 Billion over the course of the contract. We got a check for 1 Billion at the start of 2009. We should have another 500 million this year and 500 million next year. Although we might have experienced a "short term" 45% downturn, the worst financial numbers I have read about show a 25% drop over the summer quarter and we are ending the year off just about 20% for 2009. I am not picking on you, just want to make sure facts and figures don't start becoming urban legends.

I think the main point is that no one knows what would have happened at a standalone Delta in the last year. We may have grown, we may have shrunk, we may have stayed the same. Most analysts think we would have shrunk and probably more than what happened with the merger. It is just a fantasy for someone to say, "but for the merger, my career would have been.....". All you can really say for sure is the pay rates would have been lower, the retirement worse, and I wouldn't have $50,000 worth of stock in my 401K. (I know, I know, it only has value when you sell it)

Nosmo King 01-08-2010 09:40 AM


Originally Posted by slowplay (Post 740471)
If you're looking at pure north/south moves (meaning base AND equipment, not SLC M88 to MSP M88 or MSP 320 to SLC 320), then there were 228 South pilots that moved to North bases and equipment and 227 North pilots that moved to South bases and equipment. There will be a slight change to these numbers when the bid error for frozen categories is finally corrected (approximately 20 guys, with about 60 trickle downs), but it shouldn't change the ratio substantially.

The seniority list worked as a seniority list should.

Is that all equipment or wide body. The original post asked specifically about wide body.

Ferd149 01-08-2010 09:40 AM


Originally Posted by slowplay (Post 740466)
I personally am tired of the whining. I'm tired of the entitlement mentality. I'm tired of the ignorance and revision of history. Not that you have to be understanding of my fatigue, but I challenge some here to look in the mirror and see if they see a reflection of reality. "I got screwed..."
Yeah, right...:mad: Your butt got saved, and that's both premerger groups.

I agree 100%. Both companies would have done a great deal of pull down by now if we hadn't merged, resulting in guys on the street. This whole thing has been hard, but as I've said before, guys who are whining are guys without anything to do. Whiners, come do my 4th in a row NYC phone book sized revision (that is sitting on my desk as we speak, undone) or organize my flight bag with my new Delta books (who knows if I have them right):eek:

Slow, the bad news......it took a strike to tamp down all the red/green moaning. Good look to us all.

Ferd

sailingfun 01-08-2010 09:43 AM


Originally Posted by Eric Stratton (Post 740451)
E1Out,

How many Dal south guys were bumped out of a WB seat by Dal north pilots on your last bid? Was the migration to ATL as bad as some projected? I'm just curious how things turned out.

Atlanta sadly was downsized in the last bid. There were no openings for anyone N or S to move into unless they had a displacement.

newKnow 01-08-2010 10:12 AM


Originally Posted by NERD (Post 740302)
New,

I have always enjoyed your posts and now that I know who you are even more. As always it was good talking to you the other day. Happy new year and congrats again on your latest accomplishment.

NERD,

It was great talking to you. Now that you got your spot back and you might actually have to work, I'm sure I'll see you around campus more. Congrats on that. As for your congrats to me, I'm just glad it's over. The latest accomplishment is probably the last. I quit! :D.


New k

tsquare 01-08-2010 10:15 AM


Originally Posted by slowplay (Post 739630)
The answer is in Section 1 of the PWA. Once a number is established it doesn't have to be reduced unless they furlough Delta pilots.

So in otherwords... no. those numbers can remain at whatever level they are when the company decides to start parking mainline aircraft. Thanks.



Originally Posted by slowplay (Post 739630)
No, they can't reduce our flying to zero unless they don't furlough and continue to pay us. That would be a nice paid vacation...:rolleyes:

Your flippant retort tells me you have no clue what I am talking about. "can't... unless..." My comment was purely theoretical, and goes to the point that our contracts are built primarily with growth in mind, and little if any protection when things start going south. Scope is particularly lakcking in this area IMO.


Originally Posted by slowplay (Post 739630)
Your comment about RJ's remaining constant is bogus as well. Just prior to the merger the combined NWA Airlink/DCI fleet was over 800 aircraft. It is at 680 now, with 50 more aircraft to be reduced this year. Even with the DC-9's leaving the fleet, the Connections are parking at over 3 times the rate. DCI block hours are shrinking in comparison to mainline as well.

Nice deflection. Tell me this. WHY are they parking those RJs? Because they are unprofitable, or due to contractual constraints? Either way is nice, but for purposes of this particular discussion, it is because of the economy, right? And this exactly proves my point.


Originally Posted by slowplay (Post 739630)
Did you not get your morning glimpse of Kiffin's wife? (all things UT to you:p)

Uh, no.. I saw something much better.

tsquare 01-08-2010 10:24 AM


Originally Posted by forgot to bid (Post 740037)
You ready?

BTW, there is a sizeable number in this audience tonight and on this forums who will be noting the differences between Texas and Alabama girls on the sidelines. Good luck to the both of you, we'll see who the camera likes.


The Million Dollar band needs to look into Jenny Craig... ugh...

tsquare 01-08-2010 10:26 AM

duplicated effort

slowplay 01-08-2010 10:26 AM


Originally Posted by Model Citezen (Post 740478)
Slo,
I believe we went from a 30 Billion dollar company to 24 billion during 2009..... that about a 20% drop in revenue (not 45%). The Amex deal is to provide 2 Billion over the course of the contract. We got a check for 1 Billion at the start of 2009. We should have another 500 million this year and 500 million next year. Although we might have experienced a "short term" 45% downturn, the worst financial numbers I have read about show a 25% drop over the summer quarter and we are ending the year off just about 20% for 2009. I am not picking on you, just want to make sure facts and figures don't start becoming urban legends.

You're correct on the Amex cash. Only $1.5 billion has been delivered so far. $500 million remains to be paid.

Take a look at Delta's Investor Day presentation (it's on Delta.com under Investor Relations). You'll see that June corporate revenue was down 45% YOY. The trend line is encouraging, but that's because the YOY comparables are so bad (Oct-Dec 2008 was awful as well). We're still down about 10.5% full year comparing 2009 with 2007. Those are SEC disclosed facts, not urban legends. Oh, our peak annual revenue was $34 billion in 2008, falling to less than $28 billion this year. While some of that decline (about 30%) was mitigated by lower average fuel prices and lower operating costs due to reduced capacity, the net effect was $4 billion less in cash flow for debt service, fleet renewal, and payraises. Put any of those facts into the premerger standalone Delta/NWA business plans and tell me what they look like.:eek:

tsquare 01-08-2010 10:27 AM


Originally Posted by forgot to bid (Post 740052)
You'll always find yourself cheering for your rival.

.

Not if your rival is the FU gators. Never.. ain't gonna do it.. wouldn't be prudent.

Rudder 01-08-2010 10:29 AM

Is there any place we can actually read the marketing agreement between DL and AS?

tsquare 01-08-2010 10:30 AM


Originally Posted by newKnow (Post 740108)
WYou think DAL will let me coach UT part time? :rolleyes:

No... I think we are happy with Lane Kiffin thank you just the same. :D

slowplay 01-08-2010 10:41 AM


Originally Posted by Ferd149 (Post 740492)
I agree 100%. Both companies would have done a great deal of pull down by now if we hadn't merged, resulting in guys on the street. This whole thing has been hard, but as I've said before, guys who are whining are guys without anything to do. ....

Slow, the bad news......it took a strike to tamp down all the red/green moaning. Good look to us all.

Ferd, thanks for that. I'm starting to see more and more folks on here that "get it," and that's heartening to me. We will always have the 2% that want to complain about the location of their new bigger slice of cheese because the old, moldy cheese got moved. They will point to the fact that they "expected" better cheese than we delivered anyway, so whatever is accomplished is a failure...:( Thankfully, that vocal little group is continuing to be overrun by the successes that we've achieved together.

Xray678 01-08-2010 10:44 AM


Originally Posted by Eric Stratton (Post 740451)
E1Out,

How many Dal south guys were bumped out of a WB seat by Dal north pilots on your last bid? Was the migration to ATL as bad as some projected? I'm just curious how things turned out.

You can't really go by the las bid. ATL had a ton of displacements. So very few people, DAL-N or DAL-S, were able to get into ATL.

10000 01-08-2010 11:22 AM

Sgn
 
Hey, I'm try'en to get out to SGN before it goes away.........any intel;)

Ferd[/quote]


Ferd
I think you need to bid either PTN# 6095 on the 17th or #6092 on the 16th. Both our double SGN's with either two 50+hr layovers and a SPN turn or a double SGN with a 50+ and a 28+hr layover with two SPN turns. Either way only 6 or 8 legs in 12 days. Plus you keep your room in NRT for 3 or 4 days while doing the SPN turns.

Of course you would have to give up your SPN Tour Guide duties to become a SGN guide. I am hoping you would not miss BF in his Speedo poolside in SPN.

Fishfreighter 01-08-2010 11:28 AM

Listen, I know what you guys are all saying. My point is that Alaska pilots are perfectly happy to haul Delta customers in our system. We'd rather not be assimilated, thank you very much.

Ferd149 01-08-2010 11:35 AM


Originally Posted by 10000 (Post 740562)
Ferd
I think you need to bid either PTN# 6095 on the 17th or #6092 on the 16th. Both our double SGN's with either two 50+hr layovers and a SPN turn or a double SGN with a 50+ and a 28+hr layover with two SPN turns. Either way only 6 or 8 legs in 12 days. Plus you keep your room in NRT for 3 or 4 days while doing the SPN turns.

Of course you would have to give up your SPN Tour Guide duties to become a SGN guide. I am hoping you would not miss BF in his Speedo poolside in SPN.

Yeah I've got both on the wish list (I'm a rotation bidder). I'm sorta nervous about 53 hours anywhere but what the heck. May do 6092 for the one 29 and one 53. Orrrrrrrr may just do my usual SPN & GUM:D

Geeze, heard stories about BF on the beach. I don't hang with the guy, I hear enough just going down on the flight. He doesn't like me much, I rarely agree with him and tell him so:D

Ferd

Got any good SGN intel? (I don't think I'm interested in the tunnels)

tsquare 01-08-2010 11:37 AM


Originally Posted by Fishfreighter (Post 740563)
Listen, I know what you guys are all saying. My point is that Alaska pilots are perfectly happy to haul Delta customers in our system. We'd rather not be assimilated, thank you very much.


From what I have heard, so is DAL management, and that is not a slam at management or anyone else for that matter. It is a fact that I have heard with my own ears.

sailingfun 01-08-2010 11:39 AM


Originally Posted by Fishfreighter (Post 740563)
Listen, I know what you guys are all saying. My point is that Alaska pilots are perfectly happy to haul Delta customers in our system. We'd rather not be assimilated, thank you very much.

Sadly for both Delta and Alaska pilots there wont be much choice in the matter. Once the JAL deal is done look for the loser to go after Alaska. If Delta gets JAL then I think AMR will come after Alaska in a big way. If AMR retains JAL then Delta will move to protect the Alaska feed.

RockyBoy 01-08-2010 11:39 AM


Originally Posted by Fishfreighter (Post 740563)
Listen, I know what you guys are all saying. My point is that Alaska pilots are perfectly happy to haul Delta customers in our system. We'd rather not be assimilated, thank you very much.

I'm sure you are, but us Delta guys would rather haul them ourselves, especially us West coast guys. Since us growing internally will cost us alot of cash and do nothing but dilute yields further on the West coast, I think that us "merging" with AK via a stock swap or something of that nature would be the best move financially speaking. If that happens, none of us have any say in how things will go down. An arbitration panel will decide what to do with us and precedent shows some sort of category and class ratioed integration.

Sink r8 01-08-2010 11:57 AM

Guys,

I don't see how we can have a thread about us, and about a merger. Some of the stuff we write here is purely "feel-good" kind of stuff, and I think it must look arrogant from the outside.

Besides, I don't see how anyone can see clearly on any one particular topic, when this thread is a collection of them. I've tried to spin this discussion off, to a new thread titled "Dedicated DAL/ALK Discussion Anyone?" so that we can get more football and chicks in here.

I appreciate it if anyone gives it a read, and maybe helps shift this discussion there.

Thanks,

Sink r8.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:04 AM.


User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Website Copyright ©2000 - 2017 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands