Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-20-2011 | 06:21 PM
  #64301  
Carl Spackler's Avatar
Back on TDY
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 12,487
Likes: 0
From: 747-400 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by DAL 88 Driver
This doesn't surprise you, does it?
I predicted it as soon as the NMB made the ruling. I really, really wanted to be wrong.

Carl
Old 04-20-2011 | 06:28 PM
  #64302  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 5,583
Likes: 326
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
Well it's official. DALPA refuses to file a grievance over the obvious RAH scope violation. If this doesn't make us realize that ALPA is hurting us, I cannot imagine what ever will.

Carl
ALPA is a failure. There is no hope for ALPA. The only way for us to progress is to get rid of ALPA completely. It is not fixable. ALPA has been built on a bad foundation. We need to tear it down completely. I respect ACL, but I do not respect his opinion on ALPA. I personally believe that ANYTHING is better than ALPA including DPA. I will send my card in for any union that is not ALPA including DPA.
Old 04-20-2011 | 06:31 PM
  #64303  
forgot to bid's Avatar
veut gagner à la loterie
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 23,286
Likes: 0
From: Light Chop
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
I predicted it as soon as the NMB made the ruling. I really, really wanted to be wrong.

Carl
I'm with you, I did too.

If you have a jet that seats more than 97 then you don't fly for Delta Connection... unless ALPA is trying to get you to vote them in, then you're free to fly 767s and 747s as far as they're concerned.

Why in the hell would RAH want them over IBT? They'll throw us under the bus for the sake a 3000 lower paid pilots then what will they do to them? Kind of the idea of "if she'll break up with him to go out with you then she'll break up with you to go out with someone else, you're nothing special."

When the official word comes out, and if it is what I think it is, then the DPA card goes out and if the IBT knocks on the door, I'll sign that card too.

There is hope though, maybe the APA will put in an application and win a grievance against RAH.
Old 04-20-2011 | 06:37 PM
  #64304  
Carl Spackler's Avatar
Back on TDY
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 12,487
Likes: 0
From: 747-400 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by forgot to bid
When the official word comes out, and if it is what I think it is, then the DPA card goes out and if the IBT knocks on the door, I'll sign that card too.
The official word just came out via email update from DALPA.

Carl
Old 04-20-2011 | 06:39 PM
  #64305  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 5,583
Likes: 326
Default

Originally Posted by forgot to bid
I'm with you, I did too.

If you have a jet that seats more than 97 then you don't fly for Delta Connection... unless ALPA is trying to get you to vote them in, then you're free to fly 767s and 747s as far as they're concerned.

Why in the hell would RAH want them over IBT? They'll throw us under the bus for the sake a 3000 lower paid pilots then what will they do to them? Kind of the idea of "if she'll break up with him to go out with you then she'll break up with you to go out with someone else, you're nothing special."

When the official word comes out, and if it is what I think it is, then the DPA card goes out and if the IBT knocks on the door, I'll sign that card too.

There is hope though, maybe the APA will put in an application and win a grievance against RAH.
I'm tired of statements like this. Screw APA. We need to fight our own battles. I've heard statements from our fellow pilots saying that if the United/Continental contract is not significantly better than our current contract, then we will have very minimal contractual gains. Whatever happened to taking care of ourselves?
Old 04-20-2011 | 06:48 PM
  #64306  
forgot to bid's Avatar
veut gagner à la loterie
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 23,286
Likes: 0
From: Light Chop
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
The official word just came out via email update from DALPA.

Carl
Thanks, that didn't pop up. My outlook is screwed up for some reason.

I read it and see one thing here to keep in mind - they're still looking at it.

I'm going to wait to light the powder.

Because it is true that the NMB didn't declare STS on that 07APR ruling. Thus it does not allow us to immediately file a grievance over a scope violation. It opened the door to find them STS. This has to be brought back before the NMB again before we can have them declared STS and file.

Although there is a different way I'd like to see this coming out. It should be, hey, good news, NMB issued a statement about RAH being STS for representation. That ruling doesn't allow us to file a grievance per se, but it gave us a lot of ammo we hope to use to show STS and therein file a grievance.

But that's not very tactful but what I am reading here seems very weak but slightly hopeful.

Now don't ask me what I think will come out in May but for now I will hold out a little bit of hope.

This is like the morning after a big lottery drawing, I don't want to know if I won, just let me dream about my A-26 for a few more hours.

Originally Posted by hockeypilot44
I'm tired of statements like this. Screw APA. We need to fight our own battles. I've heard statements from our fellow pilots saying that if the United/Continental contract is not significantly better than our current contract, then we will have very minimal contractual gains. Whatever happened to taking care of ourselves?
Imagine the irony if that occurred though.
Old 04-20-2011 | 06:56 PM
  #64307  
DAL 88 Driver's Avatar
At home on the maddog!
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 2,874
Likes: 0
From: Retired (mandatory age 65)
Default

Originally Posted by hockeypilot44
I'm tired of statements like this. Screw APA. We need to fight our own battles. I've heard statements from our fellow pilots saying that if the United/Continental contract is not significantly better than our current contract, then we will have very minimal contractual gains. Whatever happened to taking care of ourselves?
That's another serious problem with DALPA. They're pinning all our hopes to "pattern bargaining." That's great for a normal situation. But we're digging out of a MASSIVE hole! It would take a 70% increase to our current contract's end rates to restore the buying power of our C2K rates. Even if we wanted to be "reasonable" and settle for a 50% increase, you're not going to get anything like that with "pattern bargaining." It's time to take a stand and make it clear to all concerned that we will not rest until this profession and our careers are put back on track. DALPA has had almost half a decade to do this. It is abundantly clear to me they have no intention of doing so.
Old 04-20-2011 | 07:02 PM
  #64308  
forgot to bid's Avatar
veut gagner à la loterie
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 23,286
Likes: 0
From: Light Chop
Default

Originally Posted by DAL 88 Driver
That's another serious problem with DALPA. They're pinning all our hopes to "pattern bargaining." That's great for a normal situation. But we're digging out of a MASSIVE hole! It would take a 70% increase to our current contract's end rates to restore the buying power of our C2K rates. Even if we wanted to be "reasonable" and settle for a 50% increase, you're not going to get anything like that with "pattern bargaining." It's time to take a stand and make it clear to all concerned that we will not rest until this profession and our careers are put back on track. DALPA has had almost half a decade to do this. It is abundantly clear to me they have no intention of doing so.
I agree.

Long term 88, I can't see how we can stay with ALPA if they continue to serve the airlines that are airline outsources our work to in order to keep us from doing it because we cost too much.

And what I fear is if RA and the BOD came out tomorrow and said NO MORE RJ'S! THEY MUST BE GONE BY END OF SUMMER! It'd get push back from Herndon would it not?
Old 04-20-2011 | 07:07 PM
  #64309  
forgot to bid's Avatar
veut gagner à la loterie
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 23,286
Likes: 0
From: Light Chop
Default

Disregard, answered my own rant.
Old 04-20-2011 | 07:09 PM
  #64310  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 5,583
Likes: 326
Default

Originally Posted by forgot to bid
Thanks, that didn't pop up. My outlook is screwed up for some reason.

I read it and see one thing here to keep in mind - they're still looking at it.

I'm going to wait to light the powder.

Because it is true that the NMB didn't declare STS on that 07APR ruling. Thus it does not allow us to immediately file a grievance over a scope violation. It opened the door to find them STS. This has to be brought back before the NMB again before we can have them declared STS and file.

Although there is a different way I'd like to see this coming out. It should be, hey, good news, NMB issued a statement about RAH being STS for representation. That ruling doesn't allow us to file a grievance per se, but it gave us a lot of ammo we hope to use to show STS and therein file a grievance.

But that's not very tactful but what I am reading here seems very weak but slightly hopeful.

Now don't ask me what I think will come out in May but for now I will hold out a little bit of hope.

This is like the morning after a big lottery drawing, I don't want to know if I won, just let me dream about my A-26 for a few more hours.



Imagine the irony if that occurred though.
You should change your statement to read, "I'm a Delta pilot, and we do not light the powder." If the powder was going to be lit, it would have happened years ago. We have proven time and time again that no matter how much wrong ALPA does, we will do nothing to stop it. I keep hearing how if ALPA gives us on scope one more time, they will pay. Well the truth is ALPA is still giving up on scope every single day. I'm done talking about this. We really should stop discussing scope. We have none. In the long run, the smallest aircraft Delta will fly will be the 320. The only reason why I think the line will be drawn there is because our 757's will be replaced by 321's that will pay the same as our leftover 320's.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22617
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices