Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Delta (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/)
-   -   Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/36912-any-latest-greatest-about-delta.html)

acl65pilot 06-02-2011 11:08 AM


Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp (Post 1002327)
Last I heard was June 1 for the AE. Guess that didn't happen. ;)

Signed,

Yearning for the APA system in Mecca

You may get part of that wish. You going to look for the AE tomorrow? :rolleyes:

acl65pilot 06-02-2011 11:10 AM


Originally Posted by buzzpat (Post 1002316)
I had a fnwa 330 guy in our js last week and he said the talk on the street in SEA is 150-200. Lots of guys who came out of ANC supposedly are bailing.

The ones I talked to in NRT seemed very warm to the idea of leaving. Same with a bunch of whale drivers. I know if I had a pension or part, and was over 60 I would be gone to live on the beach in my condo. Life is just too good to pass that up.

newKnow 06-02-2011 11:11 AM


Originally Posted by newKnow (Post 1002237)
alfa,

Like it or not, you, pineapple, and sailing or slow (I can't remember which one) are equated to be the ALPA insiders on APC, so forgive me if I confuse what one of you said earlier with what someone else said.

But, one of you told me that the reason Alaska was allowed to fly to Atlanta and Minneapolis from Seattle is because of scope language that NWA brought to the merger. If this is the case, pre-merger I NEVER remember seeing an Alaska airplane in Minneapolis. On the other hand, I do remember Alaska attempting to fly an NWA route (I can't remember which one), NWA pilots not being happy with it, and NWA responding by putting a daily 747-200 flight from SEA to ANC. Subsequently, Alaska Airlines changed their mind about flying the NWA route. (Maybe someone can refresh my memory on the details again. I'm getting old.)

Back then we flew EVERY flight between MSP and SEA and Alaska management and their pilots didn't have a problem with it. So, I'm not using analogies, I'm comparing the past to the present.

Presently, Alaska Airlines pilots are flying routes that we used to fly exclusively. In the past, they did not. So, presently I don't particularly care who would or should be offended by us doing the same flying out of the same places we used to fly out of now. What I do care about is what appears to be a loss of flying that we are more than capable of performing. If it is a loss of flying, the way I see it, we (DALPA) should be the offended ones. But, for some reason, we are not.

Obviously, something has changed. But, I wonder if it is the language and terms of our scope agreement or if it is the mindset of our DALPA leaders.

I just don't remember our scope agreement changing.


[UPDATE]

I just heard from my Council 1 rep (within 12 hours -pretty good, huh?).

After exchanging a few emails, here's what I take away from it:

* The Alaska flying into our hubs is permitted under our codeshare agreement.

* There is a formula that permits a certain amount of those flights that is connected to an amount of Delta flights.

* Alaska could have done the same flying under the NWA agreement.

* Alaska tried to do that contractually legal flying against NWA, but because NWA wanted to have their cake and eat it to, they retaliated against it, and forced Alaska off the route. (sounds like the NWA I remember :) )

* Because Alaska is so vested into code share agreements, no one wants to merge with them. ie, if DAL merged with them, they would lose all of the American traffic Alaska carries and vice versa. (Good news, because I don't want to merge with Alaska.)

The bottom line is Alaska could have flown to MSP before, but NWA made sure they didn't. Delta management's mindset is different than NWA's. What we see now is Delta following the codeshare agreement and a possible return of Alfa and I arguing about the pros and cons of having a mindset of winning at all costs. Boy, that was ugly. :D

georgetg 06-02-2011 11:17 AM


Originally Posted by alfaromeo (Post 1002134)
I want Delta to make more money because I want them to pay me more money.

I doubt there are many here who "don't want Delta to make money"
Let me see if I can paraphrase:
By having Alaska pilots fly the Delta code, Delta is able to be in markets it would otherwise be less or not profitable. As a result Delta is effectively offering more seatmiles without the associated overhead of flying it in-house.
The employees benefit because as the company is more profitable it is able to pay its employees more money.
Fast forward to 2025 (Hypothetical)
Delta is the largest airline in the world with the most seatmiles of any airline out there. Delta flies an all wide-body fleet, and has contracts with various lift providers around the world to feed the operation. There are 5000 pilots on the seniority list and for the last 18 years not one pilot was furloughed. Captains pay is between $275-300/hour and FO pay is between $205-230.
By comparison Southwest airlines, now also a global carrier, ranks number two to Delta in seat-miles. The two companies are equally profitable, but Southwest chose to grow organically after a disastrous merger with Airtran in 2011. Southwest flies a mix of widebodies and narrowbodies on all of it's own routes. Southwest has 12000 pilots on its seniority list. At Southwest Captains pay is between $240-295/hour and FO pay is between $190-225.
Considering the above scenario:
  1. Were we successful as a pilot group?
  2. Were we successful as a labor group?

Cheers
George

80ktsClamp 06-02-2011 11:19 AM


Originally Posted by acl65pilot (Post 1002329)
You may get part of that wish. You going to look for the AE tomorrow? :rolleyes:

Friday, Friday, gettin' our AE on Friday?

http://i.qkme.me/10nr.jpg

forgot to bid 06-02-2011 11:21 AM


Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp (Post 1002337)
Friday, Friday, gettin' our AE on Friday?

http://i.qkme.me/10nr.jpg

PARTYING PARTYING YEAH! PARTYING PARTY... wait... AE or crotch shots from your local congressman or LEC rep?

forgot to bid 06-02-2011 11:27 AM


Originally Posted by satchip (Post 1002290)
Hey FTB, edit my post to embed the video, please. I can't remember how.

Wilco.....


Originally Posted by satchip (Post 1002245)
The voluntary early out program window is open....

Come on you guys, take the early out! Real life awaits you! Golf for free at any our our signature courses!



forgot to bid 06-02-2011 11:37 AM


Originally Posted by georgetg (Post 1002336)
I doubt there are many here who "don't want Delta to make money"
Let me see if I can paraphrase:
By having Alaska pilots fly the Delta code, Delta is able to be in markets it would otherwise be less or not profitable. As a result Delta is effectively offering more seatmiles without the associated overhead of flying it in-house.
The employees benefit because as the company is more profitable it is able to pay its employees more money.
Fast forward to 2025 (Hypothetical)
Delta is the largest airline in the world with the most seatmiles of any airline out there. Delta flies an all wide-body fleet, and has contracts with various lift providers around the world to feed the operation. There are 5000 pilots on the seniority list and for the last 18 years not one pilot was furloughed. Captains pay is between $275-300/hour and FO pay is between $205-230.
By comparison Southwest airlines, now also a global carrier, ranks number two to Delta in seat-miles. The two companies are equally profitable, but Southwest chose to grow organically after a disastrous merger with Airtran in 2011. Southwest flies a mix of widebodies and narrowbodies on all of it's own routes. Southwest has 12000 pilots on its seniority list. At Southwest Captains pay is between $240-295/hour and FO pay is between $190-225.
Considering the above scenario:
  1. Were we successful as a pilot group?
  2. Were we successful as a labor group?

Cheers
George

This is a great post in that it should invoke a lot of thought about the long term consequences of JVs and the use of regional jets because they make the company money and that's good for pilots. Something that should've been done in 1993 when the CRJ-200 was introduced if websites like this one had existed.

I seriously doubt, seriously, that in 10 years we have more pilots than we have today.

I don't ever see us growing much larger than we are now fleet wise. Just replacing and outsourcing.

As to Southwest, I don't see them getting much larger in their NB fleet. I could see more jets coming but eventually 717s, 735s and 733s replaced without many more 73N orders. After all to go into some markets that are weak to begin with and compete for business is something they, like us, won't do either.

Bucking Bar 06-02-2011 11:47 AM


Originally Posted by georgetg (Post 1002336)
I doubt there are many here who "don't want Delta to make money"
Let me see if I can paraphrase:
By having Alaska pilots fly the Delta code, Delta is able to be in markets it would otherwise be less or not profitable. As a result Delta is effectively offering more seatmiles without the associated overhead of flying it in-house.
The employees benefit because as the company is more profitable it is able to pay its employees more money.
Fast forward to 2025 (Hypothetical)
Delta is the largest airline in the world with the most seatmiles of any airline out there. Delta flies an all wide-body fleet, and has contracts with various lift providers around the world to feed the operation. There are 5000 pilots on the seniority list and for the last 18 years not one pilot was furloughed. Captains pay is between $275-300/hour and FO pay is between $205-230.
By comparison Southwest airlines, now also a global carrier, ranks number two to Delta in seat-miles. The two companies are equally profitable, but Southwest chose to grow organically after a disastrous merger with Airtran in 2011. Southwest flies a mix of widebodies and narrowbodies on all of it's own routes. Southwest has 12000 pilots on its seniority list. At Southwest Captains pay is between $240-295/hour and FO pay is between $190-225.
Considering the above scenario:
  1. Were we successful as a pilot group?
  2. Were we successful as a labor group?

Cheers
George

My crystal ball has a printer. It just sent:

Originally Posted by Aviation Week, June 2036
Delta Air Lines threatens strike

Master Chairman of the Delta pilots' union, New K Jr., was quoted today stating Delta pilots will clean out their lockers in preparation to a strike over pay and working condition disagreements following an inability to reach an agreement on Contract 2017.

The President of the Delta Airlines legacy division of SkyWest/Airfrance Partners, Holdings, Ltd., LLC responded "Delta has pilots? Who knew? For that matter, who cares?" referring to the unprecedented outsourcing which has diminished the union's relevance in labor issues. Since being acquired by SkyWest/AirFrance the Delta pilot force has suffered a number of setbacks, beginning with the refusal of SkyWest's Pilots Association to merge the Delta pilots and the Air Line Pilots' Association's position that Delta scope wasn't binding on a third party holding company structure.

The President of the Airline Pilot's Association was reached at a SkyWest pizza party. He offered no comment.

Delta currently operates 2 DC9's on the Atlanta to Minneapolis route on an essential air service subsidy. Jerry Atkin, III said "the DC9 is an anachronism, but we're just seeing how far we can take this thing." Delta passengers have all been re booked on code share partner, Southwest airlines.


Pineapple Guy 06-02-2011 11:54 AM


Originally Posted by Bucking Bar (Post 1002353)
My crystal ball has a printer. It just sent:

Nice post, and I share your concerns. Hence my desire for portable seniority.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:42 PM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands