Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?
Oil's at $93/barrel.
Oil falls to below $93 amid stronger US dollar - Business - Oil & energy - msnbc.com
Oil falls to below $93 amid stronger US dollar - Business - Oil & energy - msnbc.com
Can't abide NAI
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 11,990
It is not a gamble. "Gamble" means they think there are odds that it will pay off. History is clear that there is no pay off in relaxed scope. The end result is always alter ego replacement until the union's representational power is irrelevant then eventual total replacement with non union workers.
We have entered the phase of representational irrelevance. We don't pick fights with management. Management placates us with 14 references to a narrow body RFP being flown by mainline pilots, feeding the peace while real airplanes are put into service which replace ours.
Why would we look at any other union's history and assume we are different?
Line Holder
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: Douglas whipping boy
Posts: 44
short call
Reserve question. If I have a trip on my schedule for a morning sign-in on day one of RES, do I get a short call credit? Let's also say I have a trip that signs in at 0900 on day one and is a two day trip. On day 2, I find out that I have a morning trip tomorrow. Any short call credit there?
Look on the bright side..at least we only have 6 short calls now!
Patrick
Can't abide NAI
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 11,990
Reserve question. If I have a trip on my schedule for a morning sign-in on day one of RES, do I get a short call credit? Let's also say I have a trip that signs in at 0900 on day one and is a two day trip. On day 2, I find out that I have a morning trip tomorrow. Any short call credit there?
They got that idea by listening to management's bankruptcy bargaining presentations which were created by a bunch of Harvard outsourcing experts. Now they consider themselves "educated" and traditional unionists are "fools."
It is not a gamble. "Gamble" means they think there are odds that it will pay off. History is clear that there is no pay off in relaxed scope. The end result is always alter ego replacement until the union's representational power is irrelevant then eventual total replacement with non union workers.
We have entered the phase of representational irrelevance. We don't pick fights with management. Management placates us with 14 references to a narrow body RFP being flown by mainline pilots, feeding the peace while real airplanes are put into service which replace ours.
Why would we look at any other union's history and assume we are different?
It is not a gamble. "Gamble" means they think there are odds that it will pay off. History is clear that there is no pay off in relaxed scope. The end result is always alter ego replacement until the union's representational power is irrelevant then eventual total replacement with non union workers.
We have entered the phase of representational irrelevance. We don't pick fights with management. Management placates us with 14 references to a narrow body RFP being flown by mainline pilots, feeding the peace while real airplanes are put into service which replace ours.
Why would we look at any other union's history and assume we are different?
ALPA is now in partnership with management and they say so right out loud.
Traditional trade unionists have been marginalized and portrayed as dangerous extremists.
Filing a simple grievance to enforce our scope is a completely radical notion.
I think its too late to reverse course. We are committed. I hope Moak's philosophy works and we are not "representationally irrelevant" but I'm very skeptical. (if you couldn't tell)
I tend to agree with you Bar. ALPA's decision not to defend mainline scope could be the end of us.
Moak and O'Malley and the rest of the ALPA establishment see themselves as corporate executives now. They are "engaged" and in the know. They have a guy on the Board of Directors. Management strokes their egos by having them sign very important looking confidentiality agreements and then feeding them "privileged information" that the lowly line pilots couldn't possibly absorb and comprehend.
ALPA is now in partnership with management and they say so right out loud.
Traditional trade unionists have been marginalized and portrayed as dangerous extremists.
Filing a simple grievance to enforce our scope is a completely radical notion.
I think its too late to reverse course. We are committed. I hope Moak's philosophy works and we are not "representationally irrelevant" but I'm very skeptical. (if you couldn't tell)
I tend to agree with you Bar. ALPA's decision not to defend mainline scope could be the end of us.
ALPA is now in partnership with management and they say so right out loud.
Traditional trade unionists have been marginalized and portrayed as dangerous extremists.
Filing a simple grievance to enforce our scope is a completely radical notion.
I think its too late to reverse course. We are committed. I hope Moak's philosophy works and we are not "representationally irrelevant" but I'm very skeptical. (if you couldn't tell)
I tend to agree with you Bar. ALPA's decision not to defend mainline scope could be the end of us.
Think if the Founding Forefathers though that way.
If you want the change you describe it has to start at the bottom, and web boards are only a tool.
They got that idea by listening to management's bankruptcy bargaining presentations which were created by a bunch of Harvard outsourcing experts. Now they consider themselves "educated" and traditional unionists are "fools."
It is not a gamble. "Gamble" means they think there are odds that it will pay off. History is clear that there is no pay off in relaxed scope. The end result is always alter ego replacement until the union's representational power is irrelevant then eventual total replacement with non union workers.
We have entered the phase of representational irrelevance. We don't pick fights with management. Management placates us with 14 references to a narrow body RFP being flown by mainline pilots, feeding the peace while real airplanes are put into service which replace ours.
Why would we look at any other union's history and assume we are different?
It is not a gamble. "Gamble" means they think there are odds that it will pay off. History is clear that there is no pay off in relaxed scope. The end result is always alter ego replacement until the union's representational power is irrelevant then eventual total replacement with non union workers.
We have entered the phase of representational irrelevance. We don't pick fights with management. Management placates us with 14 references to a narrow body RFP being flown by mainline pilots, feeding the peace while real airplanes are put into service which replace ours.
Why would we look at any other union's history and assume we are different?
Reserve question. If I have a trip on my schedule for a morning sign-in on day one of RES, do I get a short call credit? Let's also say I have a trip that signs in at 0900 on day one and is a two day trip. On day 2, I find out that I have a morning trip tomorrow. Any short call credit there?
Agreed. My opinion is that when you sit six SC's in a month it is worse than flying 69 hrs. Normally I am luck to get three a month.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post