Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?
There is a whole bunch of bad info posted here on the Ipads. Here are a the main points.
1. Delta has not ruled out buying Ipads. They are being tested as we speak.
2. There is no issue with other employees since the Ipads would not be for personal use and more then likely locked out from downloading apps ect..
3. The IPad is not certified for use below 10,000 and must be turned off. It can't replace Jepps in the cockpit. It can only replace other company publications most of which are stored on the aircraft such as the MDM.
4. The GPS in the Ipad does not meet any avaition standards and could never be used for Geo referenced positions on plates and charts. A huge negative for the Ipad.
5. Delta is testing several other options more avaition oriented that offer a lot more functionality then the Ipad. The cost however is higher.
6. The test period runs into the summer. No decisions will be made for a few months.
1. Delta has not ruled out buying Ipads. They are being tested as we speak.
2. There is no issue with other employees since the Ipads would not be for personal use and more then likely locked out from downloading apps ect..
3. The IPad is not certified for use below 10,000 and must be turned off. It can't replace Jepps in the cockpit. It can only replace other company publications most of which are stored on the aircraft such as the MDM.
4. The GPS in the Ipad does not meet any avaition standards and could never be used for Geo referenced positions on plates and charts. A huge negative for the Ipad.
5. Delta is testing several other options more avaition oriented that offer a lot more functionality then the Ipad. The cost however is higher.
6. The test period runs into the summer. No decisions will be made for a few months.
Also, RA wants something that signs you in for a rotation the second you hit airport property, allows automatic pub updates at that time, as well as a real time interface that scheduling can auto notify you on your i-pad of a reroute, sked change etc. They would also like some sort of mtc reporting functionality.
I can see all of this coming either in a tablet form or something more specifically designed for aviation.
Airbus Orders Pressure Boeing
Airbus Orders Pressure Boeing - WSJ.com
Delta needs to get it's orders into the que or we'll be waiting for some time.
How about Bombardier's C-Series? Debuts in 2013.
Heard: Bombardier Looks Like Flying Ace
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000...555035984.html
Airbus Orders Pressure Boeing - WSJ.com
Delta needs to get it's orders into the que or we'll be waiting for some time.
How about Bombardier's C-Series? Debuts in 2013.
Heard: Bombardier Looks Like Flying Ace
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000...555035984.html
Last edited by Elvis90; 06-17-2011 at 03:06 AM.
They could be, but a mounting device and packup power source would need to be created in the flight deck.
Also, RA wants something that signs you in for a rotation the second you hit airport property, allows automatic pub updates at that time, as well as a real time interface that scheduling can auto notify you on your i-pad of a reroute, sked change etc. They would also like some sort of mtc reporting functionality.
I can see all of this coming either in a tablet form or something more specifically designed for aviation.
Also, RA wants something that signs you in for a rotation the second you hit airport property, allows automatic pub updates at that time, as well as a real time interface that scheduling can auto notify you on your i-pad of a reroute, sked change etc. They would also like some sort of mtc reporting functionality.
I can see all of this coming either in a tablet form or something more specifically designed for aviation.
I'll toss this out as a proposal. Interim Ipad gap filler could be that the company either "recommends" or "mandates" Ipads for pilots. This has the effect of making the Ipad an unreimbursed employee expense which is something that can be written off in the year it was put in use much like jeffeson binders or steel toed shoes.
Input?
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,919
Likes: 0
I'll toss this out as a proposal. Interim Ipad gap filler could be that the company either "recommends" or "mandates" Ipads for pilots. This has the effect of making the Ipad an unreimbursed employee expense which is something that can be written off in the year it was put in use much like jeffeson binders or steel toed shoes.
Input?
Input?
Just a guess.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,877
Likes: 193
I think if the company ever decides to go with the Ipad, the preference from there end will be to purchase them in bulk in a predetermined customized configuration. Allowing pilots to purchase Ipads on their own limits the company's ability to maintain control on how these devices are used.
Just a guess.
Just a guess.
Your guess is spot on. The Ipads would be limited to company use. If you wanted one to run your apps and surf APC you will have to carry two.
The 10,000 foot restriction on the IPad is probably a killer at this time however Alaska is working on the FAA for a waiver. Alaska still carries all paper Jepps and absent a waiver or recert to a class 2 EFB they are not going away.
Line Holder
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,774
Likes: 18
Your guess is spot on. The Ipads would be limited to company use. If you wanted one to run your apps and surf APC you will have to carry two.
The 10,000 foot restriction on the IPad is probably a killer at this time however Alaska is working on the FAA for a waiver. Alaska still carries all paper Jepps and absent a waiver or recert to a class 2 EFB they are not going away.
The 10,000 foot restriction on the IPad is probably a killer at this time however Alaska is working on the FAA for a waiver. Alaska still carries all paper Jepps and absent a waiver or recert to a class 2 EFB they are not going away.
The EFB does *not* need to be physically attached to the aircraft or powered by an aircraft power source to be legal under 10,000 feet.
We are working on EFB certification via iPad (LIDO charts), and there will be no stipulation on altitude of use (would make them useless).
This is the *second* company I've worked at that has or will have EFBs, and the last place definitely did NOT have a mount point for the EFBs. FAA POI signed off, though...
Food for thought... don't over-read that AC and confuse the requirements. What's important is that the trial runs demonstrate that it doesn't interfere with aircraft systems and that it's useable by the flight crew, and that in the event of system failure(s), backup plans are in place.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 2,530
Likes: 0
Agreed-how is it that EJM is putting them in hundreds of jets to fly 91/135 to be used in all phases of flight and they can't be used 121? Something strange is afoot at the Circle K.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,877
Likes: 193
I don't know where you guys get your EFB info from (yes, yes, the EFB Advisory Circular), but many people seem to misinterpret the rules regarding EFBs (maybe even the FSDOs?)
The EFB does *not* need to be physically attached to the aircraft or powered by an aircraft power source to be legal under 10,000 feet.
We are working on EFB certification via iPad (LIDO charts), and there will be no stipulation on altitude of use (would make them useless).
This is the *second* company I've worked at that has or will have EFBs, and the last place definitely did NOT have a mount point for the EFBs. FAA POI signed off, though...
Food for thought... don't over-read that AC and confuse the requirements. What's important is that the trial runs demonstrate that it doesn't interfere with aircraft systems and that it's useable by the flight crew, and that in the event of system failure(s), backup plans are in place.
The EFB does *not* need to be physically attached to the aircraft or powered by an aircraft power source to be legal under 10,000 feet.
We are working on EFB certification via iPad (LIDO charts), and there will be no stipulation on altitude of use (would make them useless).
This is the *second* company I've worked at that has or will have EFBs, and the last place definitely did NOT have a mount point for the EFBs. FAA POI signed off, though...
Food for thought... don't over-read that AC and confuse the requirements. What's important is that the trial runs demonstrate that it doesn't interfere with aircraft systems and that it's useable by the flight crew, and that in the event of system failure(s), backup plans are in place.Class 1 EFB is Portable Electronic Device (PED) that is typically stowed during critical phases of flight. Typically Commercial Off-the Shelf Systems (COTS)
The airline's decision follows a successful trial by 100 line and instructor pilots and Air Line Pilots Association representatives, who evaluated the feasibility of using iPads as electronic flight bags this past winter and spring. The iPads contain an app called GoodReader that is loaded with PDF versions of 41 flight, systems and performance manuals, reference cards, and other materials. The electronic manuals include hyperlinks and color graphics, enabling pilots to find information faster and easier, the airline said. Updating can now be accomplished with one tap on the iPad screen instead of the labor-intensive process of replacing individual pages one by one. The iPad is considered a Class 1 electronic device, meaning it is stowed during takeoff and landing under FAA regulations.
Note the last line. Alaska does not use the IPad as a approach plate replacement and for now can't legally do so. There is some doubt if the Ipad will ever be approved at a 121 airline for critical flight use however several different airlines are working on the certification.
Can't abide NAI
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 12,078
Likes: 15
From: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Also, RA wants something that signs you in for a rotation the second you hit airport property, allows automatic pub updates at that time, as well as a real time interface that scheduling can auto notify you on your i-pad of a reroute, sked change etc. They would also like some sort of mtc reporting functionality.

Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post




