Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Delta (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/)
-   -   Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/36912-any-latest-greatest-about-delta.html)

DAL 88 Driver 07-13-2011 10:05 AM


Originally Posted by Bucking Bar (Post 1021931)
... and it will be complied with. My poorly stated point was that the boogey man the DPA seeks to resurrect for political use has ascended into retirement.

Bar,

I don't understand your thinking on this. DPA's concerns on the language in the ALPA Administrative Manual seem legit to me. It's just like our poorly written, loop hole ridden, scope language. You can't just bury your head in the sand and say, "oh no big deal, nobody will ever use that."

shiznit 07-13-2011 10:28 AM


Originally Posted by Bucking Bar (Post 1021827)
The DPA can't offer a solution until they correctly identify the problem. Blaming National will not change anything.

I still don't understand why the DPA crowd doesn't put any real energy into a signed pledge or "contract with Delta Pilots" that they take to each LEC rep, and if they don't get on board with it, start a recall process. If the DPA supporters are genuinely desire change to the point of actually taking action.

It will do a number of things, all of which will be good for Delta Pilots.

1) The LEC reps will understand that they have a large number of pilots who are willing so be active in their commitment to restoration and that they expect actions and communications from their reps that reflect that, if not then they will be replaced with a rep who is on board with that message.

2) It will show that the DPA is more than just a vocal discontented group of pilots, and that they are intent on taking action.

3) Give a "member-driven" agenda to the MEC to act upon. It is said by many DALPA proponents (and I am one of them as of now), that if you want to see change, go to meetings, send up resolutions, get involved. If 3000 pilots (and I'm sure many like-minded in all respects of restoring the profession but not wanting to go solo to get there) it would have potentially unifying results.

DPA propents better step up to the plate when it comes time for negotiations to ensue.....I still want to see 3000+ members volunteer for the SPC when called upon to send a message to DAL management that we are ready, willing, and that we truly demand restoration.

DPA needs to show me a "body of work" before I can believe that it will be better with a different bargaining agent. Show me some concrete examples of accomplishment, small at first and growing larger over time that PROVE to me that the theory and efficacy of their ideas produce results. I'm not voting for a group that hasn't proved to me that they can accomplish goals to improve my career as a Delta Pilot.

So far, DALPA is doing ok...Not excellent, just ok. The results are satisfactory for work outside Section 6, the communication to the pilot group on "clarity of purpose and mission" from DALPA stinks.

I think of DALPA and the "best contracts ever negotitated" argument with the investment disclaimer: "Past returns do not garauntee future results."

All I can say for DPA thus far: ...............................
DPA proponents better step up to the plate when it comes time for negotiations to ensue.....I still want to see 3000+ members volunteer for the SPC when called upon to send a message to DAL management that we are ready, willing, and that we truly demand restoration.

capncrunch 07-13-2011 10:43 AM


Originally Posted by Pineapple Guy (Post 1021901)
I have no such concerns regarding my elected reps.

I know you don't have any concerns about it...

DAL 88 Driver 07-13-2011 10:51 AM


Originally Posted by shiznit (Post 1021957)
I still don't understand why the DPA crowd doesn't put any real energy into a signed pledge or "contract with Delta Pilots" that they take to each LEC rep, and if they don't get on board with it, start a recall process. If the DPA supporters are genuinely desire change to the point of actually taking action.

It will do a number of things, all of which will be good for Delta Pilots.

1) The LEC reps will understand that they have a large number of pilots who are willing so be active in their commitment to restoration and that they expect actions and communications from their reps that reflect that, if not then they will be replaced with a rep who is on board with that message.

2) It will show that the DPA is more than just a vocal discontented group of pilots, and that they are intent on taking action.

3) Give a "member-driven" agenda to the MEC to act upon. It is said by many DALPA proponents (and I am one of them as of now), that if you want to see change, go to meetings, send up resolutions, get involved. If 3000 pilots (and I'm sure many like-minded in all respects of restoring the profession but not wanting to go solo to get there) it would have potentially unifying results.

DPA propents better step up to the plate when it comes time for negotiations to ensue.....I still want to see 3000+ members volunteer for the SPC when called upon to send a message to DAL management that we are ready, willing, and that we truly demand restoration.

DPA needs to show me a "body of work" before I can believe that it will be better with a different bargaining agent. Show me some concrete examples of accomplishment, small at first and growing larger over time that PROVE to me that the theory and efficacy of their ideas produce results. I'm not voting for a group that hasn't proved to me that they can accomplish goals to improve my career as a Delta Pilot.

So far, DALPA is doing ok...Not excellent, just ok. The results are satisfactory for work outside Section 6, the communication to the pilot group on "clarity of purpose and mission" from DALPA stinks.

I think of DALPA and the "best contracts ever negotitated" argument with the investment disclaimer: "Past returns do not garauntee future results."

All I can say for DPA thus far: ...............................
DPA proponents better step up to the plate when it comes time for negotiations to ensue.....I still want to see 3000+ members volunteer for the SPC when called upon to send a message to DAL management that we are ready, willing, and that we truly demand restoration.

Shiznit,

I see some merit in your idea about widespread recalls. I'd jump on board with that with my reps in a heartbeat if I thought it would do any good. But how does that solve the conflict of interest with ALPA National and the info/advice/services they provide to us? How does it make what's best for the Delta pilots the #1 priority and only consideration with the union representing us?

Reroute 07-13-2011 10:58 AM


Originally Posted by Ferd149 (Post 1021919)
Thanks, I appreciate the perspective.

I had heard a guy I respect opine that 4 would be a good number due to the increased workload of a larger group. But, I see the deadlock issue and I guess 5 would be too many guys on FPL:D

I agree I'm not that interested in what a guys premerger group is, only that they reflect the will of the group. Which, I would argue, is less company friendly than years past. However, we may be dealing with human nature somewhat as I've talked to old Hughes Airwest guys that refer to themselves as Hughes guys (not even "green guys")........and that is how many mergers ago now?

Ferd, PMFJI, but is there really more work as a negotiator because our pilot group is bigger? The contract still has the same number of sections. The number of pilots working under that contract, IMO, is not relevant to the work load of negotiating it. My understanding is that the cost of full time FPL, benefits, expenses, travel and lodging for the extra negotiator is over $400k/year. If the Negotiating Chairman says he prefers three vs. four, or he can be equally effective with three v. four, should it be a four man committee?

Jack Bauer 07-13-2011 11:01 AM


Originally Posted by shiznit (Post 1021957)
I still don't understand why the DPA crowd doesn't put any real energy into a signed pledge or "contract with Delta Pilots" that they take to each LEC rep, and if they don't get on board with it, start a recall process. If the DPA supporters are genuinely desire change to the point of actually taking action.

It will do a number of things, all of which will be good for Delta Pilots.

1) The LEC reps will understand that they have a large number of pilots who are willing so be active in their commitment to restoration and that they expect actions and communications from their reps that reflect that, if not then they will be replaced with a rep who is on board with that message.

2) It will show that the DPA is more than just a vocal discontented group of pilots, and that they are intent on taking action.

3) Give a "member-driven" agenda to the MEC to act upon. It is said by many DALPA proponents (and I am one of them as of now), that if you want to see change, go to meetings, send up resolutions, get involved. If 3000 pilots (and I'm sure many like-minded in all respects of restoring the profession but not wanting to go solo to get there) it would have potentially unifying results.

DPA propents better step up to the plate when it comes time for negotiations to ensue.....I still want to see 3000+ members volunteer for the SPC when called upon to send a message to DAL management that we are ready, willing, and that we truly demand restoration.

DPA needs to show me a "body of work" before I can believe that it will be better with a different bargaining agent. Show me some concrete examples of accomplishment, small at first and growing larger over time that PROVE to me that the theory and efficacy of their ideas produce results. I'm not voting for a group that hasn't proved to me that they can accomplish goals to improve my career as a Delta Pilot.

So far, DALPA is doing ok...Not excellent, just ok. The results are satisfactory for work outside Section 6, the communication to the pilot group on "clarity of purpose and mission" from DALPA stinks.

I think of DALPA and the "best contracts ever negotitated" argument with the investment disclaimer: "Past returns do not garauntee future results."

All I can say for DPA thus far: ...............................
DPA proponents better step up to the plate when it comes time for negotiations to ensue.....I still want to see 3000+ members volunteer for the SPC when called upon to send a message to DAL management that we are ready, willing, and that we truly demand restoration.

DALPA is broken. As another person here mentioned earlier the system in place at ALPA/DALPA is built to resist true change. Many have contacted their reps, gone to the meetings, tried recalls, ect only to be shut out/down. Its time to start fresh with a new blueprint for success. There is just too much fat and red tape to cut at DALPA. It makes more sense to build a structure from the ground up beholden only to Delta Pilots and Delta Pilots alone without having to tiptoe around the wants/needs of the connection pilots who are now currently represented by ALPA.

Check Essential 07-13-2011 11:06 AM


Originally Posted by georgetg (Post 1021872)
Here is the key: the NMB found RAH to be a single transportation system for pilot representation purposes. Sure we cant use that ruling, but that doesn't mean that their published findings are invalid.
In other words -- in order to rule STS the NMB had to investigate RAH and has published the "evidence". All we have to do is use the already established "evidence" to bring our case.

Why any of this matters?
If we don't defend the contract we have, what else is there to defend?

ALPA will never file that grievance. Doing so could bring their conflict of interest into full view. A ruling in favor of our scope clause could trigger lawsuits against ALPA for violating their duty of fair representation to RJ pilots.
That may be the real reason for the prior scope settlement as well. If Moak had proceeded with the grievance and forced DAL to park those 76 seaters then the DCI pilots would have sued ALPA.
The relevant portions of our scope clause were negotiated without going through ALPA's stated policy of consulting with the RJ guys as called for in the RJDC settlement agreement.
Its a fine mess were in.

Now we've apparently lost the TWA suit. We're all going to get to pay for that too. ALPA's legal team is on a roll.

Bucking Bar 07-13-2011 11:09 AM


Originally Posted by Check Essential (Post 1021987)
ALPA will never file that grievance. Doing so could bring their conflict of interest into full view. A ruling in favor of our scope clause could trigger lawsuits against ALPA for violating their duty of fair representation to RJ pilots.
That may be the real reason for the prior scope settlement as well. If Moak had proceeded with the grievance and forced DAL to park those 76 seaters then the DCI pilots would have sued ALPA.
The relevant portions of our scope clause were negotiated without going through ALPA's stated policy of consulting with the RJ guys as called for in the RJDC settlement agreement.
Its a fine mess were in.

Now we've apparently lost the TWA suit. We're all going to get to pay for that too. ALPA's legal team is on a roll.

Republic Airlines Holdings pilots are TEAMSTERS members. There is no "conflict of interest" within ALPA. ALPA does not represent them.

JABDIP 07-13-2011 11:18 AM


Originally Posted by georgetg (Post 1021570)
If the same lawyer team that helped craft Section 1 now advises us that the language is weak, something is amiss....


Either:
  • The original lawyers did a poor job
  • The current lawyers aren't good enough to get results
  • There is a lack of interest in pursuing legal action
I want to know which it is and why.


Cheers
George

Not to worry, we have the best lawyers ALPA money can buy. They are right on top of it. You think so when they also represent the very DCI guys that our flying is being out sourced to??????? HMMMM!!!:(

shiznit 07-13-2011 11:21 AM


Originally Posted by DAL 88 Driver (Post 1021976)
Shiznit,

I see some merit in your idea about widespread recalls. I'd jump on board with that with my reps in a heartbeat if I thought it would do any good. But how does that solve the conflict of interest with ALPA National and the info/advice/services they provide to us? How does it make what's best for the Delta pilots the #1 priority and only consideration with the union representing us?

As I've said in other places, you have to prove to me that "DPA supporters" can change the smaller things first, and that will give me confidence to trust that the aims and methods of a "DPA" can and will be successful in the larger. So far its just been talk and complain, "DALPA su*ks, our way is better."


Originally Posted by Jack Bauer (Post 1021985)
DALPA is broken. As another person here mentioned earlier the system in place at ALPA/DALPA is built to resist true change. Many have contacted their reps, gone to the meetings, tried recalls, ect only to be shut out/down. Its time to start fresh with a new blueprint for success. There is just too much fat and red tape to cut at DALPA. It makes more sense to build a structure from the ground up beholden only to Delta Pilots and Delta Pilots alone without having to tiptoe around the wants/needs of the connection pilots who are now currently represented by ALPA.

DPA needs to show me that they will TRY to fix the problems they see at the local level, if they can't modify and fix the current policy manual, how on God's green earth are they going to write one from scratch. Even if the efforts are rebuffed, you've now created a "body of work" that you can use to SPECIFICALLY show how a "DPA" would function and the structure that would be employed! That would give real and concrete examples that the "silent majority" could use to compare one system over the other. Without that, its all just bluster.

If DPA can't even muster the effort, organization and resolve to fix small things now; they will not be able to "rebuild" a large labor union from the ground up.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:44 PM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands