Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-25-2012 | 01:55 PM
  #93781  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 5,113
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by buzzpat
Actually, Johnso, IMHO, bringing smaller jets to the company and getting giddy is shortsighted. Do we want to become a regional carrier or do we want to play on the big playground? I understand where you guys are coming from. You are a product of the regionals. Yes, let us absolutely recapture our scope. But, no, let us not get comfortable with settling for that. Again, growing small is not growing big. We should shoot for growing big.
I can't help but think you're just kidding, because you're always thinking much further ahead than this. As a parody of the kind of short-sighted thinking that got us to where we are, the above is just perfect.

Scope doesn't just apply to the airplanes you're on now, but also to the airplane you were on before. That's because someone else is on that airplane, and it matters very much to them. If you're not interested in the job security of the entire list, you're opening yourself up for division, and thus conquest.

You should also note that none of this has anything to do with growing, but recapturing existing flying. I must be much closer to the bottom than you, because adding bodies behind me matters to me. I've already found out the hard way that there are worse things out there than having to slide back to a small jet.

Either we want all Delta flying to be done by Delta pilots, or we don't. It's when we try to decide which Delta jobs we care about that we invariably [deleted] up our careers.
Old 03-25-2012 | 02:11 PM
  #93782  
buzzpat's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 6,070
Likes: 1
From: Urban chicken rancher.
Default

Originally Posted by Sink r8
I can't help but think you're just kidding, because you're always thinking much further ahead than this. As a parody of the kind of short-sighted thinking that got us to where we are, the above is just perfect.

Scope doesn't just apply to the airplanes you're on now, but also to the airplane you were on before. That's because someone else is on that airplane, and it matters very much to them. If you're not interested in the job security of the entire list, you're opening yourself up for division, and thus conquest.

You should also note that none of this has anything to do with growing, but recapturing existing flying. I must be much closer to the bottom than you, because adding bodies behind me matters to me. I've already found out the hard way that there are worse things out there than having to slide back to a small jet.

Either we want all Delta flying to be done by Delta pilots, or we don't. It's when we try to decide which Delta jobs we care about that we invariably [deleted] up our careers.
No Sink, I'm not kidding. And, once again, I get it. What I am saying is that bringing smaller jets to the company is fine. It certainly behooves the junior guys. I'm not opposed to it, I actually applaud it. HOWEVER, if anybody thinks that it means we are thriving is sorely mistaken. We are a huge international airline. We pride ourselves on being the best pilots in the industry. And, in my opinion, we are. The company can't grow and WE can't grow if we don't aspire to build our WB fleet. I saw an Aeroflot 777 take off from LA last night on its way to Moscow. Do you know how many 777s we have? Frikkin Aeroflot? Which we now code share by the way. We are quickly becoming a ticket brokering regional carrier. Not what I have in mind.
Old 03-25-2012 | 02:13 PM
  #93783  
Gets Weekends Off
Liked
25M+ Airline Miles
Line Holder
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 12,831
Likes: 172
From: window seat
Default

Originally Posted by 80ktsclamp
i heard it was that only if we open up to allow republic to fly mrj's as codeshare with our scope. I think they were offering a 15% 3 year extension to the contract. I heard it from the cpo.
no deal!!!!!!!!!!
Old 03-25-2012 | 02:15 PM
  #93784  
Gets Weekends Off
Liked
25M+ Airline Miles
Line Holder
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 12,831
Likes: 172
From: window seat
Default

Originally Posted by buzzpat
I don't want to captain a Cessna. I've been a heavy jet captain for decades. I'll wait. Plus, smaller jets = smaller pay. I'll be the best damn FO in the company for better pay....and improved QOL.
I'm sure they will trip all over themselves to give us 777's and maybe even 380's if we gave up 200 seat and under scope.

Smaller planes equal disproportionately more pilot jobs. Be VERY careful what you wish for.
Old 03-25-2012 | 02:21 PM
  #93785  
Gets Weekends Off
Liked
25M+ Airline Miles
Line Holder
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 12,831
Likes: 172
From: window seat
Default

Originally Posted by buzzpat
Actually, Johnso, IMHO, bringing smaller jets to the company and getting giddy is shortsighted. Do we want to become a regional carrier or do we want to play on the big playground? I understand where you guys are coming from. You are a product of the regionals. Yes, let us absolutely recapture our scope. But, no, let us not get comfortable with settling for that. Again, growing small is not growing big. We should shoot for growing big.
The company is going to get the planes and fleet plan that the company is going to get. We need to fight to fly the smaller end of that fleet plan just as we do the larger end. I'd rather us get 80 something 747-800's and conquer the globe instead of 80 something 717's, but its not a matter of either/or. If we get 717's the company is getting them anyway so we better dang well fly them, and there will be no insane Republic C Series deal with the devil to get them either or anything that puts DL pilot jobs under Hulas or any of the little ceasars running the ACMI outsourcing multiverse with more large RJ's than they have today. If we fall for that we will get punked on the next down cycle, and there will be a next down cycle.
Old 03-25-2012 | 02:25 PM
  #93786  
tsquare's Avatar
No longer cares
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 12,109
Likes: 0
From: 767er Captain
Default

Originally Posted by buzzpat
I don't want to captain a Cessna. I've been a heavy jet captain for decades. I'll wait. Plus, smaller jets = smaller pay. I'll be the best damn FO in the company for better pay....and improved QOL.
Ahem........
Old 03-25-2012 | 02:25 PM
  #93787  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by johnso29
Buzz, smaller airplanes feed bigger airplanes. I want none of our flying outsourced. If that means flying a smaller plane, then so be it. I never said I wanted to settle with bringing small jets back to DAL. But if the line isn't drawn somewhere, then soon we won't be ordering WB's at all becuase that flying will be heavily outsourced too. Heck, some of it already is. I wouldn't expect to see WB's ordered until we see the 787-900 or equivalent WRT weight and range. RA is not interested in old technology.
You know RA well do you? Better cnx those MD90s coming in. No chance for 717s. I guess those acquired DC9s at NWA never happened either. How about the 742 freighters. He's always looked for value. Look no further than then operating economics of the 739.

RA would buy 777s in a heart beat, if and only if, it'd be more advantageous for DAL pilots to fly them. Right now, it appears DAL is more interested in JVs/Code Shares.
Old 03-25-2012 | 02:27 PM
  #93788  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 2,530
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by johnso29
That's fine, but many others would be very happy to be captain of a smaller jet. To decline bringing jets back to Delta simply becuase they're smaller and pay less is IMO.....shortsighted. It's also what started this entire RJ nightmare.
Double dong!!!
Old 03-25-2012 | 02:36 PM
  #93789  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 5,113
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by buzzpat
No Sink, I'm not kidding. And, once again, I get it. What I am saying is that bringing smaller jets to the company is fine. It certainly behooves the junior guys. I'm not opposed to it, I actually applaud it. HOWEVER, if anybody thinks that it means we are thriving is sorely mistaken. We are a huge international airline. We pride ourselves on being the best pilots in the industry. And, in my opinion, we are. The company can't grow and WE can't grow if we don't aspire to build our WB fleet. I saw an Aeroflot 777 take off from LA last night on its way to Moscow. Do you know how many 777s we have? Frikkin Aeroflot? Which we now code share by the way. We are quickly becoming a ticket brokering regional carrier. Not what I have in mind.
As long as we agree it's not an "either-or" proposition, then you're obviously correct: we want Delta pilots doing Delta flying, and bigger planes are always better than smaller planes.
Old 03-25-2012 | 02:40 PM
  #93790  
Gets Weekends Off
Liked
25M+ Airline Miles
Line Holder
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 12,831
Likes: 172
From: window seat
Default

Originally Posted by Ball Breaker
RA would buy 777s in a heart beat, if and only if, it'd be more advantageous for DAL pilots to fly them. Right now, it appears DAL is more interested in JVs/Code Shares.
RA would outsource every DL 777 in a heartbeat, even if it were more expensive to do so, if he were legally allowed to do it. They all read from the same flow chart.

https://www.lucidchart.com/documents...a-10082df8b38b

Last edited by gloopy; 03-25-2012 at 05:01 PM.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22617
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices